Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T618 vs Mediatek MT8735

UNISOC T618

► remove from comparison UNISOC T618

Der Unisoc T618 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 2 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (32, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1866 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison MT8735

Der Mediatek MT8735 ist ein 2015 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Mittelklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er wird in 28 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,3 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine ARM Mali-T720MP2 zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem inkl. CDMA2000 und 5GHz Dual-Band 802.11bgn WiFi. 

Die Leistung liegt im Bereich der älteren MT6735 (jedoch mit bis zu 1.5 GHz getaktet) SoCs im Einstiegsbereich.

show full text
ModelUNISOC T618Mediatek MT8735
SeriesUNISOC Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 « 2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 - 2000 MHz1300 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP2 (850 MHz)ARM Mali-T720
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - T618
0.5 pt (37%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 -6%
Mediatek Helio G88
0.4608 -3%
Mediatek MT8183
0.4633 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -2%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -2%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -1%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 -1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 0%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 0%
UNISOC T618
0.475
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 1%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 1%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 9%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 9%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 12%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 15%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 174%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
T618 +
22763 Points (19%)
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (9%)     max: 11114 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T618 +
min: 2526     avg: 2954     median: 3004.5 (35%)     max: 3202 Points
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (10%)     max: 864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T618 +
min: 2611     avg: 2910     median: 2961 (34%)     max: 3148 Points
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (10%)     max: 931 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T618 +
min: 365     avg: 380.2     median: 382 (15%)     max: 393 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T618 +
min: 1229     avg: 1332     median: 1325.5 (2%)     max: 1461 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T618 +
1911 Points (19%)
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (6%)     max: 647 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T618 +
5744 Points (6%)
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
597 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
1651 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
T618 +
min: 2762     avg: 2962     median: 2874.2 (3%)     max: 3432 ms
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199 (15%)     max: 13705 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
T618 +
min: 10787     avg: 12599     median: 12356.5 (10%)     max: 14722 Points
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T618 +
58 Points (16%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T618 +
min: 68     avg: 75.7     median: 74.5 (14%)     max: 93 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 T618 +
min: 38514     avg: 46604     median: 40597 (34%)     max: 60702 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 T618 +
min: 31976     avg: 38448     median: 40494 (33%)     max: 42875 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 T618 +
min: 32932     avg: 39187     median: 40289 (7%)     max: 44339 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 T618 +
min: 62476     avg: 65538     median: 66592 (24%)     max: 67546 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T618 +
min: 173051     avg: 189777     median: 192320 (19%)     max: 203961 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T618 +
min: 201310     avg: 218309     median: 213115 (13%)     max: 240502 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T618 +
min: 67085     avg: 69141     median: 68306 (19%)     max: 72033 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T618 +
min: 9058     avg: 10105     median: 10105 (16%)     max: 11152 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T618 +
min: 7404     avg: 7980     median: 8273 (34%)     max: 8414 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T618 +
5739 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
T618 +
min: 82     avg: 3510     median: 3509.5 (23%)     max: 6937 Points
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
T618 +
12638 Points (63%)
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T618 +
min: 359     avg: 372.3     median: 372.5 (14%)     max: 385 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T618 +
min: 4.22     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 6.22 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T618 +
min: 1.179     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.42 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T618 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 36% n=9

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 00:58:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12997 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731455918s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12997 +0.003s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 12997 +0.009s ... 0.043s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.001s ... 0.043s

#10 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.006s ... 0.049s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.059s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.06s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.06s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.06s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.061s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.065s

#18 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.067s

#19 return log +0.002s ... 0.07s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)