Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T616 vs DK3.5+ST vs Unisoc T7225

UNISOC T616

► remove from comparison UNISOC T616

Der Unisoc T616 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 2 GHz Taktrate und 6 kleinen Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Dual-Core-ISP (24, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x mit 1866 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

Unisoc T7225

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7225

Das Unisoc T7225 (ehemals Unisoc T612) ist ein SoC der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 stromsparenden Cortex-A55-Kernen, ebenfalls mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. 

Das T7225 kommt mit einem LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz.

Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kern, 16 Shading Units und 614 MHz Taktung. Hier liegt auch der einzige Unterschied zum Unisoc Tiger T610: Die Grafikkarte besitzt beim T7225 einen Kern weniger.

Das Unisoc Tiger T7225 wird bei TSMC im 12nm-FinFet-Prozess hergestellt.

ModelUNISOC T616DK3.5+STUnisoc T7225
SeriesUNISOC Huawei UNISOC
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A75 / A55
Serie: Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72251.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72001.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST « cores
unknown cores
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72001.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T7001.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1800 - 2000 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 828 / 8
Technology12 nm12 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (750 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T616 +
min: 2798     avg: 2956     median: 2990 (35%)     max: 3036 Points
98%
1 T7225 +
min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (35%)     max: 2990 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 T616 +
min: 2798     avg: 2954     median: 3002 (34%)     max: 3063 Points
98%
1 T7225 +
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
min: 427     avg: 433.5     median: 433.5 (11%)     max: 440 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
min: 1474     avg: 1556     median: 1572 (6%)     max: 1606 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
min: 298     avg: 350.9     median: 360 (14%)     max: 380 Points
96%
1 T7225 +
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (14%)     max: 347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
min: 1184     avg: 1410     median: 1464 (3%)     max: 1502 Points
90%
1 T7225 +
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
min: 1663     avg: 1734     median: 1734 (17%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
min: 5131     avg: 5378     median: 5377.5 (5%)     max: 5624 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T616 +
5574 Points (9%)
97%
1 T7225 +
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T616 +
1737 Points (26%)
92%
1 T7225 +
1598 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 T616 +
min: 2530.7     avg: 2711     median: 2650.4 (3%)     max: 3013.8 ms
89%
1 T7225 +
2973 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 T616 +
min: 12141     avg: 14092     median: 14522 (12%)     max: 15304 Points
87%
1 T7225 +
12581 Points (10%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T616 +
min: 45     avg: 55     median: 57.5 (16%)     max: 60 Points
80%
1 T7225 +
46 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T616 +
min: 68     avg: 78     median: 80 (15%)     max: 86 Points
91%
1 T7225 +
73 Points (13%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T616 +
200006 Points (19%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T616 +
min: 228124     avg: 230591     median: 229582 (14%)     max: 235075 Points
86%
1 T7225 +
196368 Points (12%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T616 +
min: 67445     avg: 69296     median: 69214 (19%)     max: 71312 Points
99%
1 T7225 +
68374 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T616 +
min: 3040     avg: 3123     median: 3122.5 (0%)     max: 3205 Points
95%
1 T7225 +
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T616 +
min: 52.5     avg: 53.7     median: 53.7 (39%)     max: 54.8 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T616 +
min: 192.9     avg: 197     median: 197 (6%)     max: 201 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T616 +
min: 17.7     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (23%)     max: 20.4 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T616 +
min: 199.3     avg: 213.7     median: 213.7 (6%)     max: 228 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T616 +
min: 11341     avg: 17154     median: 13300 (21%)     max: 24988 Points
101%
1 T7225 +
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (21%)     max: 15127 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T616 +
min: 7936     avg: 8004     median: 8011 (33%)     max: 8066 Points
95%
1 T7225 +
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (32%)     max: 7776 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T616 +
min: 382     avg: 388     median: 388 (15%)     max: 394 Points
94%
1 T7225 +
365 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T616 +
min: 3.47     avg: 5.9     median: 5.8 (3%)     max: 8.44 Watt
112%
1 T7225 +
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T616 +
min: 0.91     avg: 1.2     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 1.398 Watt
66%
1 T7225 +
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T616 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7225 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 17:29:32

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14016 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12765 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731774572s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14016 +0s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 14016 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#11 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#13 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.007s ... 0.019s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.033s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.033s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)