Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T612 vs Mediatek MT6739

UNISOC T612

► remove from comparison T612

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 ist ein SoC der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 stromsparenden Cortex-A55-Kernen, ebenfalls mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. 

Das T612 kommt mit einem LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz.

Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kern, 16 Shading Units und 614 MHz Taktung. Hier liegt auch der einzige Unterschied zum Unisoc Tiger T610: Die Grafikkarte besitzt beim T612 einen Kern weniger.

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 wird bei TSMC im 12nm-FinFet-Prozess hergestellt.

Mediatek MT6739

► remove from comparison MT6739

Der Mediatek MT6739 ist ein 2017 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Einstiegsklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,5 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine PowerVR GE8100 mit maximal 570 MHz Taktrate zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL), WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n sowie ein Videodecoder mit Ultra-HD- und H.265-Unterstützung.

show full text
ModelUNISOC T612Mediatek MT6739
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1500 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPU
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)PowerVR GE8100 ( - 570 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 7103     avg: 9367     median: 9264 (8%)     max: 10981 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T612 +
min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (35%)     max: 2990 Points
min: 573     avg: 614     median: 612.5 (7%)     max: 677 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T612 +
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
min: 530     avg: 615     median: 617.5 (7%)     max: 698 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T612 +
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (14%)     max: 347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T612 +
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 571     avg: 632     median: 653 (7%)     max: 675 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 1418     avg: 1733     median: 1779 (2%)     max: 1896 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T612 +
5404 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T612 +
1598 Points (24%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
T612 +
2973 ms (3%)
min: 13599     avg: 16427     median: 16545.5 (19%)     max: 18154 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
T612 +
12581 Points (11%)
min: 2093     avg: 2945     median: 3126 (3%)     max: 3386 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T612 +
46 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
T612 +
73 Points (15%)
min: 23     avg: 25     median: 25 (5%)     max: 27 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 25012     avg: 33655     median: 34225 (12%)     max: 38060 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 3811     avg: 4588     median: 4560 (14%)     max: 5263 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 12204     avg: 14766     median: 14716 (18%)     max: 16571 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 0     avg: 3951     median: 3086 (1%)     max: 18182 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 2443     avg: 18691     median: 21640 (13%)     max: 22562 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 26874     avg: 41995     median: 43387 (8%)     max: 46951 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T612 +
196368 Points (12%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T612 +
68374 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T612 +
2969 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T612 +
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (21%)     max: 15127 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T612 +
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (35%)     max: 7776 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
0 min (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 MT6739 +
2288 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 3109     avg: 3743     median: 3742.5 (8%)     max: 4376 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 2467     avg: 3206     median: 3142.5 (21%)     max: 5377 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT6739 +
min: 3742     avg: 4323     median: 4298 (22%)     max: 5136 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T612 +
365 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T612 +
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T612 +
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T612 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6739 → 24% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 20. 01:56:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9972 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726790173s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.028s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#8 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.007s ... 0.036s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9972 +0.001s ... 0.037s

#10 got single benchmarks 9972 +0.019s ... 0.056s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.056s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.013s ... 0.069s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.071s

#14 return log +0.002s ... 0.074s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)