Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T612 vs Mediatek MT6739WW

UNISOC T612

► remove from comparison T612

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 ist ein SoC der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und 6 stromsparenden Cortex-A55-Kernen, ebenfalls mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. 

Das T612 kommt mit einem LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 933 MHz und LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz.

Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kern, 16 Shading Units und 614 MHz Taktung. Hier liegt auch der einzige Unterschied zum Unisoc Tiger T610: Die Grafikkarte besitzt beim T612 einen Kern weniger.

Das Unisoc Tiger T612 wird bei TSMC im 12nm-FinFet-Prozess hergestellt.

Mediatek MT6739WW

► remove from comparison MT6739WW

Der Mediatek MT6739WW ist ein 2017 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Einstiegsklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,5 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine PowerVR GE8100 mit maximal 570 MHz Taktrate zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL), WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n sowie ein Videodecoder mit Ultra-HD- und H.265-Unterstützung. Der Unterschied zum normalen Mediatek MT6739 ist nicht bekannt, die Leistung ist vergleichbar.

show full text
ModelUNISOC T612Mediatek MT6739WW
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 « 1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 compare1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1800 - 2000 MHz1500 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G52 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPU
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP1 (614 MHz)PowerVR GE8100 ( - 570 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.unisoc.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
10230 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
T612 +
min: 2909     avg: 2944     median: 2939 (35%)     max: 2990 Points
655 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T612 +
min: 2933     avg: 2938     median: 2937.5 (34%)     max: 2942 Points
669 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T612 +
min: 344     avg: 346     median: 346 (14%)     max: 347 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T612 +
min: 1311     avg: 1340     median: 1323 (2%)     max: 1419 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
589 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1718 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
614 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1681 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
T612 +
5404 Points (8%)
1525 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
T612 +
1598 Points (24%)
549 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
653 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1791 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2544 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
1355 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
1788 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
T612 +
2973 ms (3%)
16008 ms (19%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
T612 +
12581 Points (11%)
3213 Points (3%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T612 +
46 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
T612 +
73 Points (15%)
27 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
3565 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
14593 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
3084 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
22448 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
43690 Points (8%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T612 +
196368 Points (12%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T612 +
68374 Points (19%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
T612 +
2969 Points (0%)
49040 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T612 +
min: 11681     avg: 13404     median: 13404 (21%)     max: 15127 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T612 +
min: 6566     avg: 7419     median: 7610 (35%)     max: 7776 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
2260 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
1839 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
4408 Points (22%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T612 +
365 Points (14%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T612 +
min: 3.37     avg: 5.2     median: 5.2 (2%)     max: 6.99 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T612 +
min: 1.121     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (2%)     max: 2.68 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T612 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6739WW → 230% n=8

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 20. 02:02:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14386 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11387 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726790534s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.029s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14386 +0.001s ... 0.03s

#8 got single benchmarks 14386 +0.007s ... 0.037s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11387 +0s ... 0.037s

#10 got single benchmarks 11387 +0.001s ... 0.038s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.013s ... 0.051s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.052s

#14 return log +0.002s ... 0.054s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)