Notebookcheck Logo

Unisoc T7200 vs Mediatek MT8735

Unisoc T7200

► remove from comparison UNISOC T7200

Der Unisoc T7200 (ehemals Unisoc T606) ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,6 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit ebenfalls bis zu 1,6 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kerne und 650 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison MT8735

Der Mediatek MT8735 ist ein 2015 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Mittelklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er wird in 28 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,3 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine ARM Mali-T720MP2 zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem inkl. CDMA2000 und 5GHz Dual-Band 802.11bgn WiFi. 

Die Leistung liegt im Bereich der älteren MT6735 (jedoch mit bis zu 1.5 GHz getaktet) SoCs im Einstiegsbereich.

show full text
ModelUnisoc T7200Mediatek MT8735
SeriesUNISOC Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7225 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T7200 « 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1600 MHz1300 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (650 MHz)ARM Mali-T720
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (9%)     max: 11114 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2484     avg: 2625     median: 2648.5 (31%)     max: 2697 Points
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (10%)     max: 864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2489     avg: 2604     median: 2626 (30%)     max: 2673 Points
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (10%)     max: 931 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 368     avg: 375.4     median: 377 (10%)     max: 380 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 1285     avg: 1364     median: 1364 (5%)     max: 1482 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 273     avg: 305.9     median: 309 (12%)     max: 313 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 708     avg: 1206     median: 1245 (2%)     max: 1324 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (6%)     max: 647 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
597 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8735 +
1651 Points (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2903.5     avg: 3045     median: 3017.2 (4%)     max: 3186.8 ms
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199 (15%)     max: 13705 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 2228     avg: 11332     median: 12296 (10%)     max: 13455 Points
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 51     avg: 52.6     median: 52 (15%)     max: 56 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 70     avg: 77.8     median: 77.5 (14%)     max: 86 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
155928 Points (15%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 202973     avg: 221439     median: 217160 (13%)     max: 238808 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 59826     avg: 64551     median: 61167.5 (17%)     max: 82626 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 T7200 +
1218 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 20.9     avg: 50.9     median: 57.6 (42%)     max: 69.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 154.5     avg: 351.3     median: 197.5 (6%)     max: 703 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 16.4     avg: 25.5     median: 25.3 (31%)     max: 42.1 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 192.4     avg: 574     median: 675 (19%)     max: 824 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 8373     avg: 16495     median: 17396 (28%)     max: 25251 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 6637     avg: 7338     median: 7259 (30%)     max: 8303 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T7200 +
4923 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 T7200 +
10422 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
7100 Points (46%)
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT8735 +
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 339     avg: 349.4     median: 348 (13%)     max: 362 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 2.68     avg: 4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 0.991     avg: 1.6     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 3.12 Watt

Average Benchmarks Unisoc T7200 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 30% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 03:02:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14018 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731463349s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.031s ... 0.031s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14018 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#8 got single benchmarks 14018 +0.013s ... 0.044s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.001s ... 0.045s

#10 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.007s ... 0.051s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.051s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.011s ... 0.062s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.062s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.063s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.063s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.063s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.071s

#18 return log +0.002s ... 0.073s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)