Notebookcheck Logo

UNISOC T606 vs Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

UNISOC T606

► remove from comparison  T606

Der Unisoc T606 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei großen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1,6 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit ebenfalls bis zu 1,6 GHz. Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0 (24, 8, 8 MPixel Support). Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR4/4X mit 1600 MHz. Die integrierte ARM Mali G57 MP1 Grafikkarte bietet einen Kerne und 650 MHz Taktung und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison  Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

ModelUNISOC T606Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
Series Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55Cortex-A53
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
UNISOC T619 compare1.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T618 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T616 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T612 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T610 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T606 « 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 compare1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1600 MHz2300 MHz
L3 Cache1 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology12 nm16 nm
FeaturesARM Mali G57 MP1, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSPPowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP1 (650 MHz)PowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
100%
T606 +
min: 2489     avg: 2604     median: 2626 (30%)     max: 2673 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 T606 +
min: 368     avg: 375.4     median: 377 (10%)     max: 380 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 T606 +
min: 1285     avg: 1364     median: 1364 (5%)     max: 1482 Points
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (7%)     max: 172 Points
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
173 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
920 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
842 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3870 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
T606 +
min: 2903.5     avg: 3045     median: 3017.2 (4%)     max: 3186.8 ms
12972 ms (15%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
T606 +
min: 2228     avg: 11332     median: 12296 (11%)     max: 13455 Points
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 T606 +
min: 51     avg: 52.6     median: 52 (15%)     max: 56 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
T606 +
min: 70     avg: 77.8     median: 77.5 (16%)     max: 86 Points
35 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
T606 +
155928 Points (15%)
105754 Points (10%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
T606 +
min: 202973     avg: 221439     median: 217160 (13%)     max: 238808 Points
117837 Points (7%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
T606 +
min: 59826     avg: 64551     median: 61167.5 (17%)     max: 82626 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
T606 +
1218 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 T606 +
min: 20.9     avg: 50.9     median: 57.6 (42%)     max: 69.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 T606 +
min: 154.5     avg: 351.3     median: 197.5 (6%)     max: 703 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 T606 +
min: 16.4     avg: 25.5     median: 25.3 (31%)     max: 42.1 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 T606 +
min: 192.4     avg: 574     median: 675 (19%)     max: 824 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
T606 +
min: 8373     avg: 16495     median: 17396 (28%)     max: 25251 Points
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (24%)     max: 5221 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 T606 +
4923 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 T606 +
10422 Points (22%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
T606 +
7100 Points (46%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 T606 +
min: 339     avg: 349.4     median: 348 (13%)     max: 362 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 T606 +
min: 2.68     avg: 4     median: 3.4 (1%)     max: 6.55 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 T606 +
min: 0.991     avg: 1.6     median: 1.3 (1%)     max: 3.12 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC T606 → 100% n=14

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 78% n=14

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 20. 02:55:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14018 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726793757s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14018 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#8 got single benchmarks 14018 +0.023s ... 0.053s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.004s ... 0.057s

#10 got single benchmarks 13527 +0.005s ... 0.062s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.062s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.074s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.075s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.075s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.084s

#17 return log +0.002s ... 0.086s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)