Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

Intel Core 2 Duo T5870

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 ist ein auf den Merom Kern basierender Doppelkern Prozessor für Notebooks. Er wurde später von dem in 45nm gefertigten und gleichgetakteten Core 2 Duo T6600 abgelöst. Durch Verbesserungen im Kern ist dieser auch etwas schneller.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5870Intel Core 2 Duo T5900
CodenameMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 MHz2200 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Voltage1.075V-1.175V V
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
FeaturesIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB
SocketSocket P

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1875     avg: 2092     median: 2088.5 (13%)     max: 2316 Points
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (13%)     max: 2130 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3480     avg: 3855     median: 3809.5 (3%)     max: 4319 Points
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (3%)     max: 4100 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 1355     avg: 1916     median: 1915.5 (23%)     max: 2476 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T5870 +
min: 42.47     avg: 60     median: 60 (12%)     max: 77.6 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1560     avg: 1606     median: 1628 (3%)     max: 1630 Points
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 26.78     avg: 27.4     median: 27 (6%)     max: 28.27 s
26 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61.8     avg: 63.9     median: 63.9 (3%)     max: 66 s
65 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T5870 +
1492 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
16620 MIPS (8%)
18700 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3903     avg: 3926     median: 3925.5 (8%)     max: 3948 Points
4639 Points (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T5870 +
4.9 Points (63%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 109% n=8

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 14:55:03

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 442 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732197303s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 442 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 442 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#10 got single benchmarks 439 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.011s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.019s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.021s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)