Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 ist ein Einstiegs- Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den älteren Merom Kern. Er bietet lediglich einen FSB von 667 MHz und 2MB Level 2 Cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 war zur Zeit des Erscheinens ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den älteren Merom Kern (später von dem schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst) und bietet die vollen 4 MB Level 2 Cache und Virtualization VT-x Funktionen. Der später erschienenen T7250 bietet nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache dafür jedoch einen schnelleren FSB. Trotzdem sollte er im Schnitt langsamer sein.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7500

► remove from comparison Intel T7500

Der Core 2 Duo T7500 ist ein Mittelklasse Core 2 Duo Prozessor (zur Zeit des Erscheinens sogar knapp High-End) der Merom basierenden Notebook Prozessoren. Dank 4 MB Level 2 Cache und 2.2 GHz zeigte er eine gute Anwendungs- und Spieleperformance. 

Im Vergleich zu später veröffentlichten Prozessoren, positioniert sich der T7500 auf Höhe eines Core 2 Duo P7570 oder Turion II Ultra M640-M660 in der Mittelklasse ein. Spätere Core 2 Duo Prozessoren (Penryn) unterstützen jedoch einige Features mehr und sind daher etwas schneller und stomsparender.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5850Intel Core 2 Duo T7200Intel Core 2 Duo T7500
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 « 2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 « 2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2100 MHz2000 MHz2200 MHz
FSB667667800
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt35 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Voltage1.0375V-1.300V V1.075 - 1.250V V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$286 U.S.$234 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache128 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 0.93     avg: 1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.12 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2161 Points (13%)
min: 2190     avg: 2304     median: 2307.5 (14%)     max: 2389 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3997 Points (3%)
min: 4182     avg: 4283.9     median: 4272.5 (3%)     max: 4473 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 37.5     avg: 37.5     median: 37.5 (110%)     max: 34 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1768 Points (4%)
min: 1674     avg: 1719.5     median: 1717 (4%)     max: 1757 Points
min: 1634     avg: 1878.5     median: 1906 (4%)     max: 1940 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27     avg: 27     median: 27 (110%)     max: 24.58 s
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (104%)     max: 24.58 s
min: 22     avg: 22.7     median: 23 (93%)     max: 23 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 66     avg: 66     median: 66 (135%)     max: 48.81 s
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (128%)     max: 48.81 s
min: 54     avg: 54.7     median: 54.7 (112%)     max: 48.81 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1518     avg: 1518     median: 1518 (140%)     max: 1081 s
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (147%)     max: 1081 s
min: 1344     avg: 1344     median: 1344 (124%)     max: 1081 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
19664 MIPS (9%)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
min: 19950     avg: 20063.5     median: 20063.5 (10%)     max: 20177 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13902 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
min: 13944     avg: 13945     median: 13945 (11%)     max: 13946 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4516 Points (9%)
min: 2864     avg: 4012.9     median: 4002 (8%)     max: 5006 Points
min: 2095     avg: 4544.7     median: 4629 (10%)     max: 5785 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
Errors [Close]

#0 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 37.5>34 for benchmark 50, setting:203 +0s ... 0.061s

#1 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 236> for benchmark 9, setting:2276 +0s ... 0.064s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 27>24.58 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.065s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 27>24.58 for benchmark 6, setting:2242 +0s ... 0.066s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 66>48.81 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.068s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 66>48.81 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.068s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 55.3>48.81 for benchmark 7, setting:2243 +0s ... 0.069s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1518>1081 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.07s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1597>1081 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.071s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1344>1081 for benchmark 8, setting:2244 +0s ... 0.072s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 610> for benchmark 12, setting:2279 +0s ... 0.074s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2091> for benchmark 13, setting:2280 +0s ... 0.075s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2018> for benchmark 14, setting:2281 +0s ... 0.075s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6903> for benchmark 15, setting:18 +0s ... 0.076s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5984> for benchmark 15, setting:18 +0s ... 0.076s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5.1> for benchmark 20, setting:114 +0s ... 0.079s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5.1> for benchmark 20, setting:114 +0s ... 0.079s

log 07. 05:19:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 440 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 322 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1736223570s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Jan 2025 05:19:20 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 440 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#9 got single benchmarks 440 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#11 got single benchmarks 168 +0.021s ... 0.031s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 322 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#13 got single benchmarks 322 +0.024s ... 0.055s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.056s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.057s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.059s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.06s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.061s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.061s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.062s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.063s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.064s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.064s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.065s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.066s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.067s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.068s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.069s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.07s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.072s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.072s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.072s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.073s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#40 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.074s

#41 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.075s

#42 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.075s

#43 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.076s

#44 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.076s

#45 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.077s

#46 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.077s

#47 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.078s

#48 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.079s

#49 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.079s

#50 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.079s

#51 return log +0s ... 0.079s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)