Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

Intel Core 2 Duo T5800

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 ist ein Einstiegs Doppelkernprozessor basierend auf den alten Merom Kern mit lediglich 2 MB Level 2 Cache. Er bietet keine Virtualisierungsfunktionen und ist mit 2 GHz relativ langsam getaktet.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo T7700 war der schnellste Merom basierte Core 2 Duo mit 35 Watt TDP. Die Penryn Nachfolger (z.B. Core 2 Duo T8300) waren bei gleichem Takt minimal schneller.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5800Intel Core 2 Duo T7700
CodenameMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 « 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 MHz2400 MHz
FSB800800
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.85 °C100 °C
SocketPPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXTVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
$307 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1988     avg: 2000     median: 2000 (12%)     max: 2013 Points
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (15%)     max: 2598 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3714     avg: 3755     median: 3716 (3%)     max: 3835 Points
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (3%)     max: 4665 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1629     avg: 1640     median: 1639.5 (3%)     max: 1650 Points
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 28.06     avg: 28.5     median: 28.5 (6%)     max: 28.9 s
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 69.6     avg: 90.3     median: 90.3 (4%)     max: 111 s
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1511     avg: 1521     median: 1520.5 (7%)     max: 1530 s
1266 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 11028     avg: 14012     median: 14011.5 (7%)     max: 16995 MIPS
22156 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 7694     avg: 10270     median: 10270 (8%)     max: 12846 MFLOPS
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 4286     avg: 4884     median: 5025 (10%)     max: 5340 Points
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (11%)     max: 6458 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
4.9 Points (70%)
5.3 Points (76%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T5800 +
3533 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 133% n=10

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 14:59:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 438 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732197564s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 438 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 438 +0.01s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 323 +0.011s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.009s ... 0.033s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.036s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)