Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

Intel Core 2 Duo T5200

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Duo T7700

► remove from comparison

Der Core 2 Duo T7700 war der schnellste Merom basierte Core 2 Duo mit 35 Watt TDP. Die Penryn Nachfolger (z.B. Core 2 Duo T8300) waren bei gleichem Takt minimal schneller.

Intel Core 2 Duo T7200

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 war zur Zeit des Erscheinens ein Mittelklasse Doppelkernprozessor für Notebooks. Er basiert auf den älteren Merom Kern (später von dem schnelleren Penryn Kern abgelöst) und bietet die vollen 4 MB Level 2 Cache und Virtualization VT-x Funktionen. Der später erschienenen T7250 bietet nur 2 MB Level 2 Cache dafür jedoch einen schnelleren FSB. Trotzdem sollte er im Schnitt langsamer sein.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5200Intel Core 2 Duo T7700Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Serie: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 « 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1660 MHz2400 MHz2000 MHz
FSB533800667
L2 Cache2 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt34 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478 PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Intel 64, Idle States, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization VT-x, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
$307 U.S.$286 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
Voltage1.0375V-1.300V V

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 2505     avg: 2553     median: 2553.5 (15%)     max: 2598 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4573     avg: 4620     median: 4620 (3%)     max: 4665 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 1946     avg: 2040     median: 2058 (4%)     max: 2108 Points
83%
1 T7200 +
min: 1674     avg: 1720     median: 1717 (4%)     max: 1757 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 228     avg: 233     median: 235 (90%)     max: 236 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 36     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (8%)     max: 37 s
min: 20     avg: 20.8     median: 21 (5%)     max: 21.74 s
min: 25     avg: 25.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 27 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
85 s (4%)
min: 49.55     avg: 52     median: 52.2 (2%)     max: 54 s
min: 62     avg: 63.5     median: 62.5 (3%)     max: 66 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T7700 +
1266 s (6%)
80%
1 T7200 +
min: 1585     avg: 1591     median: 1591 (7%)     max: 1597 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
13474 MIPS (6%)
22156 MIPS (11%)
min: 12234     avg: 18153     median: 18153 (9%)     max: 24072 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
10030 MFLOPS (8%)
15341 MFLOPS (12%)
min: 8806     avg: 11683     median: 11683 (9%)     max: 14560 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 591     avg: 598     median: 592 (41%)     max: 610 Points
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T7200 +
2091 Points (86%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T7200 +
2018 Points (91%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T7200 +
min: 5372     avg: 6325     median: 6472 (87%)     max: 6903 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T7700 +
min: 4014     avg: 5302     median: 5400.5 (11%)     max: 6458 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7700 +
5.3 Points (76%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 → 164% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 → 133% n=4

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 14. 18:38:04

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 328 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 323 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 168 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731605884s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 328 +0s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 328 +0s ... 0.003s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 323 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#11 got single benchmarks 323 +0.012s ... 0.015s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 168 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#13 got single benchmarks 168 +0.02s ... 0.036s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.013s ... 0.049s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.049s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)