NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia T500 Mobile (oder auch Quadro T500 Mobile) für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und mobile Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf den selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce MX450 und bietet ebenso 896 Shader und einen 64 Bit Speicherbus. Der Boost-Takt ist jedoch anscheinend etwas höher. Wie auch die MX450 ist sie mit GDDR5 und GDDR6 erhältlich, aktuell gibt es 2 und 4 GB Speichervarianten. Der TDP ist mit 18 - 25 Watt je nach Variante spezifiziert.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000 ) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000 für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für große und schwere Notebooks. Sie basiert auf den selben Chip wie die Consumer GeForce RTX 2070 jedoch mit zertifizierten Treibern für professionelle Anwendungen, weniger Kernen und geringeren Taktraten und langsameren, aber größerem Grafikspeicher.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Variante Shader TGP (W) Base (MHz) Boost (MHz) Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop 2304 160 1005 1545 Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile 1920 80 945 1380 Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q 1920 70 870 1380 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2304 65 765 1305 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2304 60 600 1215 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 115? 1215 1440
Features
Der TU106-Chip wird in 12nm gefertigt und bietet eine Reihe neuer Features, wie DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) und Real Time Ray Tracing. Dadurch lassen sich vor allem Beleuchtungseffekte sehr viel realistischer darstellen. Weiterhin gibt es Support für DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) sowie H.265 Video De- und Encoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
Die theoretische Performance sollte leicht unterhalb einer GeForce RTX 2070 liegen. Bei manchen professionellen Applikationen verhelfen die Quadro Treiber der RTX 3000 jedoch zu einer höheren Performance.
Mit einem TDP von 80 Watt benötigt die Quadro RTX 3000 zwar deutlich weniger als die stärkeren RTX 4000 und 5000 GPUs, jedoch eignet sie sich trotzdem nur für große Workstation Laptops.
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) Quadro Turing Serie Architektur Turing Turing Pipelines 896 - unified 1920 - unified Kerntakt 1365 - 1695 (Boost) MHz 945 - 1380 (Boost) MHz Speichertakt 10000 MHz 14000 MHz Speicherbandbreite 64 Bit 192 Bit Speichertyp GDDR5, GDDR6 GDDR6 Max. Speichergröße 4 GB 6 GB Shared Memory nein nein API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Stromverbrauch 25 Watt 80 Watt Herstellungsprozess 12 nm 12 nm Notebookgröße mittel (15.4" z.B.) groß (17" z.B.) Erscheinungsdatum 27.05.2019 27.05.2019 Codename N19E-Q1 Transistors 10.8 Billion Features DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T500 Laptop GPU
1.9 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
6.6 pt (20%)
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1627 avg: 1953 median: 1958 (6%) max: 2270 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 92% 80%
min: 5566 avg: 5856 median: 5923 (17%) max: 6080 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 33% 42% 37%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1554 avg: 1814 median: 1787.5 (5%) max: 2127 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 91% 77%
min: 5503 avg: 5702 median: 5589 (15%) max: 6014 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 32% 40% 34%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
140064 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15562 avg: 15975 median: 15851 (17%) max: 16513 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 94% 96% 100%
min: 32163 avg: 35433 median: 36407 (39%) max: 37729 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 52% 54%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 22719 avg: 24657 median: 23453 (6%) max: 27800 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 84% 82%
min: 62730 avg: 86865 median: 91394 (24%) max: 106470 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 33% 32%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3406 avg: 4047 median: 3973.5 (7%) max: 4833 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 90% 74%
min: 12693 avg: 13568 median: 13570 (23%) max: 14442 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 30% 38% 32%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3696 avg: 4322 median: 4224.5 (5%) max: 5141 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 90% 74%
min: 13802 avg: 14842 median: 14841.5 (17%) max: 15881 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 32% 40% 33%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
80696 Points (9%)
123598 Points (14%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 65%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6293 avg: 7692 median: 8132 (11%) max: 8212 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 99% 77% 99% 100%
min: 15944 avg: 17495 median: 17864 (25%) max: 18307 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 40% 52% 53%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6767 avg: 7808 median: 7995.5 (7%) max: 8475 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 80% 95% 93%
min: 17569 avg: 19467 median: 19878.5 (17%) max: 20542 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 39% 47% 46%
3DMark Vantage + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
50309 Points (15%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
54830 Points (30%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
31133 Points (41%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
37304 Points (49%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 83%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
58.3 fps (18%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
199.4 fps (37%)
SPECviewperf 12 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 107 avg: 112.1 median: 110.6 (27%) max: 120.2 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 99.6 avg: 112.7 median: 113.5 (17%) max: 124.3 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 76.9 avg: 81 median: 82 (18%) max: 83.2 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 43.01 avg: 46 median: 46 (12%) max: 49 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 72.4 avg: 78.2 median: 73.8 (20%) max: 92.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 11.54 avg: 11.8 median: 11.8 (11%) max: 12.13 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 113.6 avg: 118.2 median: 119.1 (48%) max: 121 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 108.8 avg: 117.5 median: 115.5 (19%) max: 130 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
min: 151 avg: 157.3 median: 158 (28%) max: 163 fps
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 64.9 avg: 80.7 median: 82.1 (22%) max: 93.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 86% 90% 69%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 109.6 avg: 120.2 median: 121.6 (33%) max: 128 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 73% 57%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 71.2 avg: 79.2 median: 77.5 (9%) max: 90.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 78% 91% 80%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 160.6 avg: 204.3 median: 215.5 (24%) max: 225.4 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 39% 46% 40%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 16.01 avg: 18.9 median: 16.9 (4%) max: 23.87 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 71% 67%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 73.3 avg: 79.3 median: 80.8 (18%) max: 82.5 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 25% 23%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 24.84 avg: 29.6 median: 28.7 (6%) max: 36.14 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 86% 69%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 53.9 avg: 59.8 median: 59.8 (12%) max: 65.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 51% 60% 48%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 48.47 avg: 53.5 median: 51.9 (6%) max: 62 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 81% 86% 78%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 155.4 avg: 182.3 median: 189.5 (22%) max: 194.7 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 32% 34% 31%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 8.57 avg: 9.6 median: 8.7 (3%) max: 12.41 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 71% 69%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 25.76 avg: 28.2 median: 28.2 (9%) max: 30.55 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 38% 39% 37%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 55.8 avg: 62.1 median: 59.2 (9%) max: 74.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 83% 75%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 160.6 avg: 182.5 median: 186.5 (27%) max: 196.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 35% 38% 35%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 81.9 avg: 88.6 median: 88.3 (10%) max: 95.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 88% 97% 85%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 185.8 avg: 199 median: 202.5 (23%) max: 205.2 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 47% 52% 46%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 45.15 avg: 51 median: 50.4 (9%) max: 57.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 83% 91% 78%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 149.4 avg: 156.7 median: 157.5 (27%) max: 162.5 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 35% 38% 33%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 37.82 avg: 40.2 median: 39.1 (8%) max: 43.59 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 90% 87%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 66.2 avg: 76 median: 68.8 (11%) max: 93.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 71%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 10.73 avg: 12.1 median: 11 (7%) max: 14.74 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 73%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 59 avg: 65.5 median: 59.3 (7%) max: 78.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 76% 76%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 8.62 avg: 9.7 median: 8.7 (6%) max: 11.96 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 72%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 29.28 avg: 34.7 median: 32.7 (16%) max: 41.95 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 78%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 16.48 avg: 19.2 median: 18 (11%) max: 23.22 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 71%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 19.56 avg: 23.3 median: 21.6 (7%) max: 28.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 75% 68%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6821 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
156.6 fps (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
129.2 fps (43%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 83% 100%
Cinebench R15 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 134 avg: 168.8 median: 173 (10%) max: 195 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 99% 78%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 192.4 avg: 203.6 median: 204 (12%) max: 214 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 66% 96% 76%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 99.6 avg: 99.8 median: 99.8 (100%) max: 100 %
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
119 fps (13%)
257.8 fps (29%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 46%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
183 fps (4%)
384.8 fps (8%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 48%
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
236 fps (14%)
407.8 fps (24%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
503 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
1010 fps (8%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 50%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
653 Samples/s (3%)
2754 Samples/s (12%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 24%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1976 Samples/s (3%)
5769 Samples/s (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 34%
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4734 Points (5%)
8716 Points (9%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 54%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.1 avg: 47.1 median: 47.1 (7%) max: 49 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 101%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.6 avg: 43.7 median: 43.7 (6%) max: 50.8 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 102%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 37.1 avg: 49.9 median: 53 (12%) max: 59.6 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 102% 106% 100%
min: 135.5 avg: 143.8 median: 143 (31%) max: 153 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 125% 118%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3674 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (38%) max: 0.4555 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 92% 100% 81%
min: 0.3523 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (36%) max: 0.4354 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 88% 100% 81%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.439 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (37%) max: 0.4617 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 95% 100%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.1 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (61%) max: 40.1 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 90% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)
min: 30.7 avg: 38.9 median: 41.2 (66%) max: 44.7 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 95% 100%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 100% n=29 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) → 253% n=29
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.9 15 ~ 13 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.1 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
65 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
35 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
29 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
24 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
54.7 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
47.2 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
42.4 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
100 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
59.8 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
44 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
29.3 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
102 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
92 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
84 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
73 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
226.5 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
107.7 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
69.2 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
46 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
114 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
91 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
86 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
77 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
96 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
77 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
62 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
39 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
135 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
100 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
88 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
79 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
108 113 ~ 111 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
17.9 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
9.6 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
31 72 ~ 52 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
25 34 ~ 30 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
22 33 ~ 28 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
21 32 ~ 27 fps
163%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
114 fps
162%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
102 fps
156%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
86 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
29.4 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
12.4 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
5.7 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
219.1 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
213.9 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
174.6 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
99.4 fps
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
83 fps
111%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
142 fps
110%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
130 fps
147%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
132 fps
153%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
121 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
27.7 fps
318%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
88 fps
301%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
274.9 303.2 ~ 289 fps
371%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
182.7 202.8 ~ 193 fps
376%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
101.3 117 ~ 109 fps
280%
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop):
53.9 59 ~ 56 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
133 148 ~ 141 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
76.1 118 ~ 97 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
19 23.2 ~ 21 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
13.2 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
14 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) → 221% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 280%
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 31 17 13 10.1 Immortals Fenyx Rising 65 35 29 24 Star Wars Squadrons 54.7 47.2 42.4 F1 2020 100 59.8 44 29.3 Strange Brigade 111 34 29 25 17.9 9.6 Far Cry 5 52 30 28 27 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 55 29.4 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 24 17 12.4 5.73 Dota 2 Reborn 128 118 90 79 27.7 The Witcher 3 96 52 29 20 GTA V 141 97 42 21 13.2 14 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 5 2 2 6 3 6 4 1 7 1 1 3 5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 2019 102 92 84 73 Total War: Three Kingdoms 226.5 107.7 69.2 46 Far Cry New Dawn 114 91 86 77 Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 96 77 62 39 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 135 100 88 79 X-Plane 11.11 114 102 86 Rocket League 219.1 Rise of the Tomb Raider 213.9 174.6 99.4 83 Dota 2 Reborn 142 130 132 121 88 The Witcher 3 289 193 109 56 BioShock Infinite 338 291 271 144 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 6 6 4 8 3 3 4 2 1
v1.28
log 05. 14:43:09
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10605 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 9854 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730814189s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Nov 2024 05:18:20 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.048s ... 0.049s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 10605 +0.029s ... 0.077s
#9 got single benchmarks 10605 +0.009s ... 0.087s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9854 +0.004s ... 0.091s
#11 got single benchmarks 9854 +0.007s ... 0.098s
#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.098s
#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.051s ... 0.149s
#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.149s
#15 Got 149 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.159s
#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.159s
#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.16s
#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.006s ... 0.166s
#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.166s
#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.168s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
