NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU vs Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia T500 Mobile (oder auch Quadro T500 Mobile) für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und mobile Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf den selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce MX450 und bietet ebenso 896 Shader und einen 64 Bit Speicherbus. Der Boost-Takt ist jedoch anscheinend etwas höher. Wie auch die MX450 ist sie mit GDDR5 und GDDR6 erhältlich, aktuell gibt es 2 und 4 GB Speichervarianten. Der TDP ist mit 18 - 25 Watt je nach Variante spezifiziert.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000 ) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU ► remove from comparison
Die Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU ist eine von Apple selbst designte Grafikkarte im Apple M2 Pro 10-Kern SoC und laut Apple mit 16 der 19 Kernen aktiviert (aktuell im Einstiegs-MacBook Pro 14 verbaut). Die GPU hat keinen dedizierten Grafikspeicher aber kann auf den schnellen gemeinsamen LPDDR5-6400? Speicher (unified Memory, 16 oder 32 GB) zugreifen.
Laut Apple soll die 19-Kern-Variante GPU 30% schneller sein als die alte 16-Kern GPU im M1 Pro sein. Daher sollte die 16-Kern-Variante ebenfalls schneller sein als die 16-Kern GPU im M1 Pro (aber nur minimal) und natürlich den direkten Vorgänger mit 14-Kernen deutlich abhängen.
Neu ist beim M2 Pro der Support für HDMI 2.1 (8K Displays).
Die iGPU unterstützt Apple's Metal 2 Schnittstelle und dürfte eine ähnliche Architektur wie die älteren PowerVR Grafikeinheiten (z.B. im Apple A10 ) aufweisen.
Da der SoC im 5nm Prozess bei TSMC hergestellt wird, sollte die Energieeffizienz hervorragend sein.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für große und schwere Notebooks. Sie positioniert sich mit ihren 2560 Shadern zwischen der Consumer RTX 2070 (2304) und RTX 2080 (2944) und dürfte daher den TU104 Chip nutzen.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Features
Der TU104-Chip wird in 12nm gefertigt und bietet eine Reihe neuer Features, wie DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) und Real Time Ray Tracing. Dadurch lassen sich vor allem Beleuchtungseffekte sehr viel realistischer darstellen. Weiterhin gibt es Support für DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) sowie H.265 Video De- und Encoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
Die Performance sollte sich zwischen der RTX 5000 / GTX 2080 und RTX 3000 / GTX 2070 einpendeln. Bei professionellen Anwendungen können die Quadro-Treiber zu einer höheren Performance führen und Nvidia bewirbt die Quadro-Linie auch mit den höheren VRAM Ausstattungen, die sich bei manchen Workflows deutlich auswirken können.
Mit einem TDP von 110 Watt eignet sich die Quadro RTX 4000 nur für große und schwere Notebooks.
NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) Quadro Turing Serie Architektur Turing Turing Pipelines 896 - unified 16 - unified 2560 - unified Kerntakt 1365 - 1695 (Boost) MHz 1110 - 1560 (Boost) MHz Speichertakt 10000 MHz 14000 MHz Speicherbandbreite 64 Bit 256 Bit Speichertyp GDDR5, GDDR6 LPDDR5-6400 GDDR6 Max. Speichergröße 4 GB 8 GB Shared Memory nein nein nein API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 Stromverbrauch 25 Watt 110 Watt Herstellungsprozess 12 nm 5 nm 12 nm Notebookgröße mittel (15.4" z.B.) mittel (15.4" z.B.) groß (17" z.B.) Erscheinungsdatum 27.05.2019 17.01.2023 27.05.2019 Codename N19E-Q3 Transistors 10.8 Billion Features DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T500 Laptop GPU
1.9 pt (6%)
...
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1627 avg: 1953 median: 1958 (6%) max: 2270 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 92% 80%
min: 6823 avg: 7362 median: 7362 (21%) max: 7901 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 58% 21% 27% 23% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1554 avg: 1814 median: 1787.5 (5%) max: 2127 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 91% 77%
min: 6851 avg: 7284 median: 7284 (19%) max: 7717 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 58% 20% 25% 21% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
445161 Points (45%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15562 avg: 15975 median: 15851 (15%) max: 16513 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 94% 96% 100%
38830 Points (37%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 58% 61%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 22719 avg: 24657 median: 23453 (6%) max: 27800 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 84% 82%
119052 Points (29%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 32% 31%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3406 avg: 4047 median: 3973.5 (7%) max: 4833 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 90% 74%
min: 15912 avg: 16903 median: 16903 (28%) max: 17894 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 58% 19% 24% 20% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3696 avg: 4322 median: 4224.5 (5%) max: 5141 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 90% 74%
min: 17619 avg: 18849 median: 18849 (21%) max: 20079 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 57% 18% 23% 19% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
80696 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
11224 Points (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 6293 avg: 7692 median: 8132 (10%) max: 8212 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 99% 77% 99% 100%
min: 19880 avg: 21595 median: 21595 (28%) max: 23310 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 60% 27% 35% 35% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 6767 avg: 7808 median: 7995.5 (7%) max: 8475 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 80% 95% 93%
min: 23739 avg: 25371 median: 25370.5 (22%) max: 27002 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 60% 25% 30% 29% 100%
3DMark Vantage + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
56250 Points (16%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
62557 Points (34%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU
31133 Points (41%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
89.9 fps (27%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom METAL *
132 Seconds (14%)
SPECviewperf 12 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
149.1 fps (37%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
186 fps (27%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
98 fps (21%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
62.4 fps (16%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
144.1 fps (39%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
13.9 fps (12%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
140.7 fps (56%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
161.9 fps (27%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 64.9 avg: 80.7 median: 82.1 (22%) max: 93.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 86% 90% 69%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 125.4 avg: 152.2 median: 152.2 (41%) max: 178.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 61% 45% 47% 36% 100%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 71.2 avg: 79.2 median: 77.5 (9%) max: 90.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 78% 91% 80%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 271.1 avg: 314.1 median: 314.1 (35%) max: 357.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 51% 20% 23% 20% 100%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 16.01 avg: 18.9 median: 16.9 (4%) max: 23.87 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 100% 71% 67%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 94 avg: 97.2 median: 97.2 (21%) max: 100.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 110 W 59% 17% 16% 100%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
min: 24.84 avg: 29.6 median: 28.7 (6%) max: 36.14 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 73% 86% 69%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 73.2 avg: 87.9 median: 87.9 (18%) max: 102.5 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 53% 26% 30% 24% 100%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 48.47 avg: 53.5 median: 51.9 (6%) max: 62 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 81% 86% 78%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 207.9 avg: 247 median: 247 (28%) max: 286.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 47% 18% 19% 17% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
min: 8.57 avg: 9.6 median: 8.7 (3%) max: 12.41 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 71% 69%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 36.03 avg: 40.5 median: 40.5 (13%) max: 45.02 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 54% 19% 20% 19% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 55.8 avg: 62.1 median: 59.2 (9%) max: 74.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 83% 75%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 208 avg: 239 median: 239 (35%) max: 269.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 52% 21% 23% 21% 100%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 81.9 avg: 88.6 median: 88.3 (10%) max: 95.8 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 88% 97% 85%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 212.6 avg: 245 median: 245 (27%) max: 277.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 56% 30% 33% 30% 100%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 45.15 avg: 51 median: 50.4 (9%) max: 57.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 83% 91% 78%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 173 avg: 178.7 median: 178.7 (31%) max: 184.3 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 63% 26% 29% 24% 100%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
min: 37.82 avg: 40.2 median: 39.1 (8%) max: 43.59 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 90% 87%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
min: 66.2 avg: 76 median: 68.8 (11%) max: 93.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 71%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
min: 10.73 avg: 12.1 median: 11 (7%) max: 14.74 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 74% 73%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
min: 59 avg: 65.5 median: 59.3 (7%) max: 78.1 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 76% 76%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
min: 8.62 avg: 9.7 median: 8.7 (6%) max: 11.96 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 72% 72%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
min: 29.28 avg: 34.7 median: 32.7 (16%) max: 41.95 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 70% 78%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
min: 16.48 avg: 19.2 median: 18 (11%) max: 23.22 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 77% 71%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
min: 19.56 avg: 23.3 median: 21.6 (7%) max: 28.9 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 75% 68%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6824 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
156.6 fps (52%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
127.6 fps (42%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 81% 100%
Cinebench R15 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 134 avg: 168.8 median: 173 (10%) max: 195 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 99% 78%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
141.9 fps (8%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 69% 99% 76%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 197 avg: 215.5 median: 215.5 (13%) max: 234 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 84% 57% 82% 63% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
99.5 % (100%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 99.6 avg: 99.8 median: 99.8 (100%) max: 100 %
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
78.7 fps (32%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
181.1 fps (33%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
493 fps (37%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
119 fps (13%)
389 fps (44%)
GPU TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 31% 100%
305.3 fps (34%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 78% 31% 100%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
183 fps (4%)
659 fps (14%)
GPU TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 28% 100%
440.5 fps (9%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 67% 28% 100%
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
236 fps (14%)
1011 fps (59%)
GPU TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 23% 100%
490.4 fps (29%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 49% 23% 100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
503 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
1815 fps (14%)
GPU TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 28% 100%
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
1213 fps (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 67% 28% 100%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
653 Samples/s (2%)
2840 Samples/s (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 23%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1976 Samples/s (3%)
5927 Samples/s (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 33%
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4734 Points (5%)
13576 Points (15%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 100% 35%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45.1 avg: 47.1 median: 47.1 (7%) max: 49 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 101%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 36.6 avg: 43.7 median: 43.7 (6%) max: 50.8 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 100% 102%
47.8 Watt (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 100% 102% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 37.1 avg: 49.9 median: 53 (12%) max: 59.6 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 102% 106% 100%
46.6 Watt (10%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 102% 106% 100% 103%
min: 137 avg: 159.5 median: 159.5 (35%) max: 182 Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 132% 153% 145% 150% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.3674 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (38%) max: 0.4555 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W 92% 100% 81%
1 fps per Watt (87%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W 44% 47% 38% 100%
min: 0.4341 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (43%) max: 0.511 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 22 W TDP 25 W TDP 110 W 48% 47% 38% 100% 45%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.439 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (37%) max: 0.4617 fps per Watt
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W 95% 100%
0.9 fps per Watt (78%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 18 W TDP 25 W 47% 49% 100%
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 36.1 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (61%) max: 40.1 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W 90% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
min: 39.6 avg: 40.8 median: 40.8 (65%) max: 41.9 dB(A)
GPU TDP ? TDP 22 W TDP 110 W 97% 100% 99%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 100% n=6 Average Benchmarks Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU → 276% n=6 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) → 195% n=6
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.9 15 ~ 13 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
10.1 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
65 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
35 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
29 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
24 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
54.7 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
47.2 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
42.4 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
100 fps
283%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
283 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
59.8 fps
346%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
207 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
44 fps
389%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
171 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
29.3 fps
413%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
121 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
89 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
50 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
80.8 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
52 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
38 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
28.9 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
258 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
75 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
48 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
36 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
22 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
98 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
77.5 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
42.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
37.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
22.4 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
180 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
122 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
96 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
70 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
47 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
25 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
267 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
180.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
151 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
85.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
63.3 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
118 124 ~ 121 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
102 104 ~ 103 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
99 103 ~ 101 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
88 94 ~ 91 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
72 82 ~ 77 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
39 46 ~ 43 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
150 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
125 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
93 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
86 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
60 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
33 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
143.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
119.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
105.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
69.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
34.2 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
116.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
100.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
86.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
81 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
65.5 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
41.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
95.4 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
93.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
85.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
81.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
72.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
39.4 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
99 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
87 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
75 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
54 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
41 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
28 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
159 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
138.6 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
72 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
105.2 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
65 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
81.6 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
57 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
85 fps
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
36 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
57.1 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
29.7 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
108 113 ~ 111 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
17.9 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
9.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
241 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
180 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
142 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
95 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
76 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
48 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
31 72 ~ 52 fps
248%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
129 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
25 34 ~ 30 fps
353%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
106 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
22 33 ~ 28 fps
357%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
100 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
21 32 ~ 27 fps
356%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
96 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
69 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
36 fps
173%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
119 122 ~ 121 fps
173%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
107 110 ~ 109 fps
162%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
88 90.2 ~ 89 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
29.4 fps
261%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
76.6 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
12.4 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
5.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
139.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
98 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
90.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
52.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
35 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
289 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
148 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
141 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
109 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
45.7 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
199.6 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
127.8 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
104.9 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
45.1 fps
116%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
146 152 ~ 149 fps
117%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
135 140 ~ 138 fps
147%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
130 133 ~ 132 fps
161%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
124 129 ~ 127 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
27.7 fps
383%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
100 111 ~ 106 fps
338%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
303 345 ~ 324 fps
452%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
215 254 ~ 235 fps
176%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
51 fps
493%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
132 153 ~ 143 fps
225%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
45 fps
375%
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
70 79 ~ 75 fps
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop):
46 56 ~ 51 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
133 148 ~ 141 fps
54%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
76 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
76.1 118 ~ 97 fps
75%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
73 fps
110%
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU:
46 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
19 23.2 ~ 21 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
13.2 fps
100%
T500 Laptop GPU:
14 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU → 128% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 170%
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) → 290% NVIDIA T500 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 31 17 13 10.1 Immortals Fenyx Rising 65 35 29 24 Star Wars Squadrons 54.7 47.2 42.4 F1 2020 100 59.8 44 29.3 Strange Brigade 111 34 29 25 17.9 9.6 Far Cry 5 52 30 28 27 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 55 29.4 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 50 24 17 12.4 5.73 Dota 2 Reborn 128 118 90 79 27.7 The Witcher 3 96 52 29 20 GTA V 141 97 42 21 13.2 14 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 5 2 2 6 3 6 4 1 7 1 1 3 5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 2020 283 207 171 121 89 50 Anno 1800 98 77.5 42.6 37.7 22.4 The Division 2 180 122 96 70 47 25 Dirt Rally 2.0 267 180.7 151 85.6 63.3 Far Cry New Dawn 121 103 101 91 77 43 Just Cause 4 150 125 93 86 60 33 Darksiders III 143.8 119.2 105.2 69.1 34.2 Battlefield V 116.7 100.6 86.6 81 65.5 41.8 Hitman 2 95.4 93.6 85.8 81.1 72.9 39.4 Assassin´s Creed Odyssey 99 87 75 54 41 28 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 138.6 105.2 81.6 85 57.1 29.7 F1 2018 241 180 142 95 76 48 Far Cry 5 129 106 100 96 69 36 X-Plane 11.11 121 109 89 76.6 Ghost Recon Wildlands 139.9 98 90.8 52.9 35 For Honor 289 148 141 109 45.7 Rise of the Tomb Raider 199.6 127.8 104.9 45.1 Dota 2 Reborn 149 138 132 127 106 The Witcher 3 324 235 143 75 51 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 3 13 9 10 12 7 3 13 2 4 9 4 12 2
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K Borderlands 3 80.8 52 38 28.9 Total War: Three Kingdoms 258 75 48 36 22 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 159 72 65 57 36 The Witcher 3 51 45 GTA V 76 73 46 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 1 3 4 1 1 3 1 1
v1.28
log 14. 05:36:34
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 10605 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11570 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 9856 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731558994s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.031s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.031s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.031s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 10605 +0.022s ... 0.053s
#10 got single benchmarks 10605 +0.001s ... 0.054s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11570 +0s ... 0.054s
#12 got single benchmarks 11570 +0.004s ... 0.058s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 9856 +0s ... 0.058s
#14 got single benchmarks 9856 +0.005s ... 0.064s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.102s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.102s
#18 Got 241 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.114s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.114s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.116s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.125s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.125s
#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.126s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
