Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400

Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Pentium Dual-Core T2390 ist ein Einstiegs-Mobilprozessor aus Anfang 2008. Er basiert auf den alten Merom Kern und bietet eingeschränkte Stromsparfunktionen und keine Virtualisierungstechnik. Aufgrund der geringen Taktrate, des langsamen FSB und des kleinen Level 2 Cache, ist die Performance nur für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend.

Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Pentium T3400 ist ein Einstiegs-Doppelkernprozessor für günstige Laptops. Er basiert noch auf den alten Merom Kern und bietet nur 1 MB Level 2 Cache. Bei der Pentium Serie sind außerdem einige Stromsparfunktionen deaktiviert (jedoch nicht so viele wie bei den Celeron Modellen). Auch auf Hardware Virtualisierung muss man beim T3400 verzichten.

show full text
ModelIntel Pentium Dual Core T2390Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400
CodenameMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Pentium Dual Core
Serie: Pentium Dual Core Merom
Intel Pentium Dual Core T34002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 « 1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 « 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T23901.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2370 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2330 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2310 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1860 MHz2160 MHz
FSB533667
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
Technology65 nm65 nm
Voltage1.075V-1.175V V1.075V-1.175V V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPPGA478PPGA478
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Intel 64, EIST, XD-BitMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 1760     avg: 1768     median: 1771 (11%)     max: 1774 Points
min: 2022     avg: 2026     median: 2026 (12%)     max: 2030 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 3257     avg: 3311     median: 3331 (2%)     max: 3344 Points
min: 3803     avg: 3817     median: 3816.5 (3%)     max: 3830 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T3400 +
38.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1467     avg: 1470     median: 1470 (3%)     max: 1473 Points
min: 1770     avg: 1779     median: 1779 (4%)     max: 1789 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 33.57     avg: 33.8     median: 33.8 (7%)     max: 34 s
min: 29.36     avg: 29.8     median: 29.8 (6%)     max: 30.3 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
81 s (3%)
73 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T3400 +
18440 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T3400 +
13910 MFLOPS (11%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3108     avg: 3437     median: 3596 (7%)     max: 3607 Points
4428 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390 → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Dual Core T3400 → 116% n=6

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 31. 01:11:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 400 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 444 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735603905s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Dec 2024 05:18:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 400 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 400 +0.008s ... 0.01s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 444 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 444 +0.01s ... 0.021s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.021s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.027s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.03s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)