Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Duo T2350 vs Intel Core Duo U2500

Intel Core Duo T2350

Intel Core Duo U2500

ModelIntel Core Duo T2350Intel Core Duo U2500
CodenameYonahYonah
SeriesIntel Core DuoIntel Core Duo
Serie: Core Duo Yonah
Intel Core Duo T2700 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2600 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2500 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2450 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2400 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2500 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2350 « 1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2250 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2400 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2300 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2050 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2700 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2600 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2500 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2450 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2400 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2500 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2250 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2400 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L2300 compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2050 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2500 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1860 MHz1200 MHz
FSB533533
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP31 Watt9 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm
Architecturex86x86
Announced = 6445 days old = 6752 days old

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U2500 +
1074 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 U2500 +
2021 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 U2500 +
922 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
35 s (8%)
49 s (11%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
82 s (4%)
120 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 U2500 +
2628 s (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 U2500 +
8178 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 U2500 +
6009 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 U2500 +
min: 1962     avg: 1985     median: 1985 (4%)     max: 2008 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo T2350 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo U2500 → 70% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 22. 06:09:27

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 330 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 349 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734844167s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 330 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 330 +0.004s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 349 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#10 got single benchmarks 349 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.009s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.014s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.016s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)