Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Duo T2300E vs Intel Core Duo U2500 vs Intel Core Duo T2700

Intel Core Duo T2300E

► remove from comparison

Intel Core Duo U2500

► remove from comparison

Intel Core Duo T2700

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core Duo T2700 war 2006 das Topmodell der mobilen Notebookprozessoren. Er besitzt zwei Rechenkerne (basierend auf den Pentium M) und bietet noch keine Unterstütztung für 64 Bit Betriebssysteme (nur 32 Bit). Er unterstützt jedoch bereits VT-x Virtualisierung. In 2010 zählt die Rechenleistung nur noch zur Einsteigerklasse (Performance eines 2 GHz Core 2 Duo P7370 z.B.).

ModelIntel Core Duo T2300EIntel Core Duo U2500Intel Core Duo T2700
CodenameYonahYonahYonah
SeriesIntel Core DuoIntel Core DuoIntel Core Duo
Serie: Core Duo Yonah
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E « 1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T27002.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U2500 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2700 « 2.33 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T26002.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T25002 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24502 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T24001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L25001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23501.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T22501.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T23001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T2300E1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L24001.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo L23001.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo T20501.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U25001.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core Duo U24001.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1660 MHz1200 MHz2330 MHz
FSB667533667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP31 Watt9 Watt31 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm65 nm
FeaturesEIST, execution Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors151 Million
Voltage1.1625V - 1.30V V
Die Size90 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
$663 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 U2500 +
1074 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 U2500 +
2021 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 U2500 +
922 Points (2%)
202%
1 T2700 +
1860 Points (4%)
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T2700 +
230 Points (88%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 U2500 +
49 s (11%)
196%
1 T2700 +
25 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 U2500 +
120 s (5%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 U2500 +
2628 s (12%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 U2500 +
8178 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 U2500 +
6009 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T2700 +
6493 Points (87%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 U2500 +
min: 1962     avg: 1985     median: 1985 (4%)     max: 2008 Points
221%
1 T2700 +
4390 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo U2500 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Duo T2700 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 18. 21:02:41

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 437 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 349 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 165 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734552161s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Dec 2024 05:18:38 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 437 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#9 got single benchmarks 437 +0s ... 0.002s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 349 +0.001s ... 0.003s

#11 got single benchmarks 349 +0.003s ... 0.006s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 165 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#13 got single benchmarks 165 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.015s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.015s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)