Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 ist ein langsam getakteter Doppelkernprozessor für Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den alten Merom Kern, bietet jedoch im Vergleich zu den Core 2 Duo Prozessoren deutlich weniger Features (weniger Stromsparmechanismen, keine Hardware Virtualisierung, ...). Laut Intel unterstützt die CPU kein Speedstep, jedoch sind Versionen im Handel mit Speedstep gesichtet worden.

Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 ist ein langsam getakteter Doppelkernprozessor für Einsteiger-Notebooks. Er basiert auf den alten Merom Kern, bietet jedoch im Vergleich zu den Core 2 Duo Prozessoren deutlich weniger Features (weniger Stromsparmechanismen, keine Hardware Virtualisierung, ...). Laut Intel unterstützt die CPU kein Speedstep, jedoch sind Versionen im Handel mit Speedstep gesichtet worden.

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron Dual-Core T1500Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700
CodenameMeromMerom
SeriesIntel Celeron Dual-CoreIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Serie: Celeron Dual-Core Merom
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T17001.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 « 1.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 « 1.83 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T15001.87 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1866 MHz1830 MHz
FSB533667
L2 Cache512 KB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm
Voltage1.075-1.175V V1.075V-1.175V V
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
FeaturesIntel 64, eXIntel 64, eX, SSE3
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
SocketPPGA478
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1625 Points (10%)
1750 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2960 Points (2%)
3270 Points (2%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1400 Points (3%)
1456 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
39 s (8%)
33.8 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
91 s (4%)
75 s (3%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
15900 MIPS (8%)
15600 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
12000 MFLOPS (9%)
11800 MFLOPS (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1700 → 108% n=7

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 21. 15:29:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 428 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 482 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732199357s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:17:18 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.001s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.001s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 428 +0.001s ... 0.002s

#8 got single benchmarks 428 +0.004s ... 0.005s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 482 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#10 got single benchmarks 482 +0.003s ... 0.009s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.009s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.015s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.017s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)