Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA T1000 vs NVIDIA T600

NVIDIA T1000

► remove from comparison

Die Nvidia T1000 Desktop ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für kleine Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf dem selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce GTX1650. Auch die Anzahl der Shadereinheiten ist mit 896 identisch. Mit 8-GB-VRAM bietet die Nvidia T1000 mehr VRAM, welcher weiterhin über ein 128 Bit Speicherbus angebunden ist. Die Leistungsaufnahme der Nvidia T1000 beträgt nur 50 Watt und kommt daher ohne einen zusätzlichen Stromanschluss aus.

Die professionellen Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.

NVIDIA T600

► remove from comparison NVIDIA T600

Die Nvidia T600 Desktop ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für kleine Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf dem selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce GTX1650. Jedoch kommt der TU 117 nur mit 640 Shadern und einem 128 Bit Speicherbus daher. Beim verbauten Speicher muss man sich mit den 4-GB-GDDR6 arrangieren  Die TDP ist 40 Watt spezifiziert.

Die professionellen Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.

show full text
NVIDIA T1000NVIDIA T600
Quadro Turing Serie
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
ArchitekturTuringTuring
Pipelines896 - unified640 - unified
TMUs5640
ROPs3232
Kerntakt1065 - 1395 (Boost) MHz735 - 1335 (Boost) MHz
Theoretical Performance5000 TFLOPS FP16, 2500 TFLOPS FP32, 0.7812 TFLOPS FP64
Speichertakt10000 effective = 1250 MHz10000 effective = 1250 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR6GDDR6
Max. Speichergröße8 GB4 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
Memory Bandwidth160 GB/s160 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.6, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Stromverbrauch50 Watt40 Watt
Transistors4.7 Billion4.7 Billion
Die Size 200 mm² 200 mm²
Herstellungsprozess12 nm12 nm
PCIe3.0 x163.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 1.4a4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Erscheinungsdatum06.05.2021 12.04.2021

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T1000
3.8 pt (11%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06483 -98%
...
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3.54 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
3.54 -6%
AMD Radeon 780M
3.57 -6%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3.64 -4%
AMD Radeon R9 380
3.67 -3%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.69 -2%
AMD Radeon R9 280X
3.73 -1%
AMD Radeon 880M
3.78 0%
Intel Arc A310
3.78 0%
NVIDIA T1000
3.78
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.82 1%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.9 3%
AMD Radeon 890M
3.96 5%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
4 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Desktop)
4.11 9%
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
4.13 9%
NVIDIA Quadro P3000
4.14 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
4.16 10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
4.33 15%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 781%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T600
2.9 pt (9%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06483 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
2.66 -9%
AMD Radeon R7 370
2.67 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
2.71 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
2.73 -7%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.75 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
2.78 -5%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.83 -3%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.83 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.92 0%
NVIDIA T600
2.93
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.95 1%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
3.01 3%
AMD Radeon R9 M395
3.05 4%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3.06 4%
AMD Radeon HD 7970
3.07 5%
AMD Radeon 680M
3.07 5%
AMD FirePro W7170M
3.1 6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
3.27 12%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
3.28 12%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 1037%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
3534 Points (10%)
2496 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
3088 Points (8%)
2195 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
398761 Points (40%)
304731 Points (31%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
179865 Points (22%)
152912 Points (19%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
37881 Points (40%)
31922 Points (34%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
50553 Points (13%)
40917 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
8124 Points (14%)
6284 Points (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
8450 Points (10%)
6552 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
237130 Points (28%)
182459 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
100%
1 T1000 +
34584 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
100%
1 T1000 +
41157 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
12953 Points (18%)
9497 Points (13%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
11793 Points (10%)
8694 Points (7%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
46318 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T600
745%
T600 +
344838 Points (100%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
39668 Points (22%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T600
30400 Points (17%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
78565 Points (86%)
46380 Points (51%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T1000
3DMark 06
58968 Points (77%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T600
43997 Points (57%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
42.2 fps (13%)
32.7 fps (10%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (59%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
100%
1 T600 +
115 fps (29%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
100%
1 T600 +
68.6 fps (10%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
100%
1 T600 +
35.3 fps (8%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
100%
1 T600 +
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
100%
1 T600 +
67.4 fps (18%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
100%
1 T600 +
5 fps (4%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
100%
1 T600 +
78.5 fps (31%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
100%
1 T600 +
76.9 fps (13%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
100%
1 T600 +
80 fps (14%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
100%
1 T600 +
114 fps (31%)
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
100%
1 T600 +
122 fps (14%)
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
100%
1 T600 +
34.9 fps (8%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
100%
1 T600 +
35.7 fps (7%)
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
100%
1 T600 +
99.8 fps (11%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
100%
1 T600 +
12.6 fps (4%)
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
100%
1 T600 +
98 fps (14%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
100%
1 T600 +
79.9 fps (14%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
39.3 fps (26%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
18.1 fps (12%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
78.1 fps (38%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
37.3 fps (23%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
44 fps (14%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
13.4 fps (13%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
4.5 fps (4%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
62.8 fps (10%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T600
46.1 fps (8%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
9.5 fps (1%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
6.7 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
43.3 fps (21%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T600
32.3 fps (15%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
21.9 fps (14%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T600
13.8 fps (9%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
27.4 fps (11%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T600
19.4 fps (8%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
100%
1 T600 +
16.9 fps (5%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA T600
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
100%
1 T600 +
75.6 fps (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6837 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T600
100%
T600 +
6830 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
252.5 fps (83%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
104.1 fps (34%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
335.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
227.1 fps (13%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T600
100%
T600 +
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
100%
1 T1000 +
386 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
100%
1 T1000 +
31.9 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
100%
1 T1000 +
38611 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
100%
1 T1000 +
36031 Points (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1987 Samples/s (9%)
1121 Samples/s (5%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
4129 Samples/s (7%)
2049 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
6369 Points (7%)
4825 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
101.9 Watt (14%)
133%
1 T600 +
76.7 Watt (11%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T600 +
83.5 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 T600 +
0.3 fps per Watt (27%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
156.8 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
100%
1 T1000 +
0.1 fps per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T1000 → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T600 → 95% n=29

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
98.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
82.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
58.8  fps
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

Avatar Frontiers of Pandora

2023
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
22  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
19  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
10  fps
Total War Pharaoh

Total War Pharaoh

2023
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
138.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
90.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
50.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
39.8  fps
Assassin's Creed Mirage

Assassin's Creed Mirage

2023
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
44  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
38  fps
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
45.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
34.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
28.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
23.8  fps
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
45  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
35.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
30.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
29.5  fps
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
108.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
96.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
63.6  fps
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands

2022
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
69.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
55.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
35.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
27.6  fps
GRID Legends

GRID Legends

2022
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
125.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
91.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
69.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
49.7  fps
God of War

God of War

2022
low 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
51.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
42.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
33.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
21.4  fps
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
110.4  fps
85%
T600:
93.5  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
56.9  fps
78%
T600:
44.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
47.4  fps
45%
T600:
21.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
40.3  fps
16%
T600:
6.3  fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
T600:
171.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
78.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
63.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
40.2  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
29.1  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
15.7  fps
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
T600:
150.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T600:
73.1  fps
high 1920x1080
T600:
55.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T600:
38.6  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
27  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
14.5  fps
Borderlands 3

Borderlands 3

2019
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
151  fps
71%
T600:
107.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
60  fps
70%
T600:
42  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
38.2  fps
70%
T600:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
28.6  fps
70%
T600:
19.9  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
13.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
5.5  fps
Total War: Three Kingdoms

Total War: Three Kingdoms

2019
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
195.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
37.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
24.1  fps
Far Cry New Dawn

Far Cry New Dawn

2019
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
117  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
58  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
53  fps
Metro Exodus

Metro Exodus

2019
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
102.3  fps
73%
T600:
74.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
45.9  fps
74%
T600:
34  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
33  fps
73%
T600:
24  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
26.1  fps
74%
T600:
19.4  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
14.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
8.5  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
226  fps
77%
T600:
174.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
87.2  fps
74%
T600:
64.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
69.4  fps
74%
T600:
51.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
59.9  fps
75%
T600:
44.8  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
31.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
17.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
127  fps
75%
T600:
95  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
62  fps
74%
T600:
46  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
57  fps
74%
T600:
42  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
53  fps
74%
T600:
39  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
26  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
12  fps
X-Plane 11.11

X-Plane 11.11

2018
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
211  fps
63%
T600:
132.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
145.8  fps
73%
T600:
107  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
130.1  fps
74%
T600:
95.9  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
40.8  fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
101.3  fps
70%
T600:
70.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
49.3  fps
71%
T600:
34.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
36.2  fps
69%
T600:
25.1  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
17.8  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
10  fps
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
100%
T1000:
246.2  fps
66%
T600:
162.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
T1000:
217.7  fps
68%
T600:
148.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
150.4  fps
80%
T600:
120.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
136.5  fps
81%
T600:
110.5  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
39.6  fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
100%
T1000:
188.8  fps
74%
T600:
139.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
T1000:
113.8  fps
73%
T600:
82.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
63.9  fps
74%
T600:
47.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
35.2  fps
77%
T600:
27.2  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
16.1  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
100%
T1000:
187.4  fps
97%
T600:
181.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
T1000:
187.1  fps
94%
T600:
175.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
103.5  fps
78%
T600:
80.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
T1000:
50.2  fps
76%
T600:
38.2  fps
QHD 2560x1440
T600:
26.6  fps
4K 3840x2160
T600:
25  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA T1000 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA T600 → 72%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 74%

NVIDIA T1000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2498.482.658.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22191510
Total War Pharaoh138.690.850.639.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage444038
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty45.134.228.323.8
Baldur's Gate 34535.230.229.5
F1 23108.396.563.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands69.255.635.327.6
GRID Legends125.491.369.649.7
God of War51.842.533.521.4
Far Cry 6110.456.947.440.3
Borderlands 31516038.228.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms195.96037.324.1
Far Cry New Dawn117625853
Metro Exodus102.345.93326.1
Strange Brigade22687.269.459.9
Far Cry 5127625753
X-Plane 11.11211145.8130.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark101.349.336.2
Dota 2 Reborn246.2217.7150.4136.5
The Witcher 3188.8113.863.935.2
GTA V187.4187.1103.550.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		1
4
7
10		1
8
10
3		2
13
5
2		8
8

1





NVIDIA T600lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Far Cry 693.544.621.36.33
F1 2021171.978.863.740.229.115.7
F1 2020150.473.155.538.62714.5
Borderlands 3107.64226.719.913.45.54
Metro Exodus74.6342419.414.88.47
Strange Brigade174.464.951.444.831.917.9
Far Cry 5954642392612
X-Plane 11.11132.810795.940.8
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark70.734.925.117.89.98
Dota 2 Reborn162.8148.6120.7110.539.6
The Witcher 3139.182.847.527.216.1
GTA V181.5175.680.338.226.625
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

5
7
5
5
2		4
4
3
1		4
5
1
7
1

9
2

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 05. 13:36:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12782 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11373 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730810198s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 04 Nov 2024 05:18:20 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.004s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.023s ... 0.027s

#9 got single benchmarks 12782 +0.004s ... 0.031s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 11373 +0.004s ... 0.035s

#11 got single benchmarks 11373 +0.004s ... 0.038s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.037s ... 0.075s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.075s

#15 Got 148 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.083s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.083s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.085s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.008s ... 0.093s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.093s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.095s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)