Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ist ein mobiler Prozessor für Notebooks. Er integriert erstmals die von Nuvia stammenden Oryon CPU-Kerne. Diese 12 (3 Cluster zu 4 Kernen) Kerne takten mit bis zu 3,4 GHz (kein höherer Dual-Core Boost wie bei den stärkeren Modellen) und nutzen den ARM v8.7 Befehlssatz. Die CPU-Leistung hängt stark vom eingesetzten TDP ein. Dieser kann von bis zu 80 Watt eingestellt werden.

Die Leistung der CPU-Kerne scheint bei angepasster Software hervorragend zu sein. Die Single-Core Performance im Cinebench 2024 kann mit den schnellsten Kernen von Apple (M3) und Intel mithalten bzw. diese sogar überholen. Unter Windows hat die CPU jedoch immer einen Nachteil bei nicht angepasster Software, da diese emuliert werden muss. Besonder Spiele sind hier stark betroffen, die oft nicht vernünftig laufen.

Zusätzlich zum CPU-Teil, integriert der X Elite eine starke NPU mit bis zu 45 TOPS für AI-Beschleunigung.

Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist etwas älter und unterstützt kein vollständiges DirectX 12 Ultimate (nur 12_1, jedoch inklusive Raytracing). Mit nur 3,8 TFLOPS bietet die GPU deutlich weniger Maximalleistung als in den Topmodellen (z.B. 4,6 TFLOPS im X1E-84-100).

Trotz der fehlenden Effizienzkerne, soll der Snapdragon X Elite laut Qualcomm sehr effizient sein. Der Chip wird im 4nm Prozess bei TSMC produziert. In unseren Tests ist die Effizienz etwas höher als bei den aktuellen Intel und AMD Modellen, aber leicht hinter Apple (M3).

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100

The Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 is a relatively affordable ARM architecture processor (SoC) for use in Windows laptops that is set to debut on June 4, 2024. The X1P-42-100 is thought to have 8 Oryon CPU cores (8 P-cores, 0 E-cores) running at a not yet known clock speed of at least 3.0 GHz. As far as other key features are concerned, the X Plus probably comes with the same 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno GPU, 45 TOPS Hexagon NPU and LPDDR5x-8448 memory controller that its bigger and smarter brother, the X1P-64-100, has.

Architecture and Features

Qualcomm Oryon cores are said to be based on the ARM v8.7 microarchitecture. Much like modern AMD and Intel processors, the Snapdragon chip is compatible with USB 4 and thus with Thunderbolt 4; it remains to be seen if the X Plus is compatible with GeForce or Radeon discrete graphics cards.

The Qualcomm SoC is said to have 8 PCIe 4 and 4 PCIe 3 lanes for connecting various kinds of devices. NVMe SSDs are supported with a throughput of up to 7.9 GB/s; the RAM controller may or may not be compatible with RAM as fast as 8448 MT/s. A 45 TOPS NPU for accelerating AI workloads is most likely included.

This X Plus chip does not make use of the same die that the X1P-64-100, X1E-78-100, X1E-80-100, X1E-84-100 are based on.

Performance

If the official performance data is any indication, the X Plus should be a whole lot slower than the 9-core Apple M4 in multi-thread workloads while being a lot more power-hungry. We'll make sure to update this section once we have in-house testing results.

Like any other Windows on ARM platform, the Snapdragon X chip works best with applications and games compiled specifically for ARM processors, of which there aren't many for the time being.

Graphics

The integrated Adreno GPU is supposed to be DirectX 12-compatible (not DirectX 12 Ultimate-compatible; as the rumors have it, there is no ray tracing of any kind here). It is also expected to deliver up to 3.8 TFLOPS of performance. For reference, the slowest professional Nvidia Ada Generation graphics card for laptops, the RTX 500 Ada, delivers up to 9.2 TFLOPS.

The Qualcomm iGPU will let you use up to 3 UHD 2160p monitors simultaneously. 2160p120 integrated displays are supported, as are the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (both decoding and encoding).

Power consumption

The X1P-42-100 is most likely going to be less power-hungry than its more powerful X Elite brothers. Expect to see anything between 10 W and 35 W under long-term workloads because that's what Ryzen U chips normally consume.

The SoC is built with a 4 nm TSMC process for decent, as of H1 2024, energy efficiency.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon XQualcomm Snapdragon X
CodenameOryonOryon
Serie: Snapdragon X Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 « - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 / 8 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100 compare - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 compare - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 compare - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 « 8 / 8 cores Oryon
Clock <=3400 MHz
Cores / Threads12 / 12
8 x 3.4 GHz
4 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
8 / 8
8 x Qualcomm Oryon
TDP35 Watt
TDP Turbo PL245 Watt
Technology4 nm4 nm
iGPUQualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)Qualcomm Snapdragon X Adreno X1-85 (3.8 TFLOPS)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
34.5 pt (48%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.8     avg: 105.4     median: 105.4 (73%)     max: 108 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 768     avg: 935     median: 956 (18%)     max: 1132 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 10856     avg: 10908     median: 10908 (10%)     max: 10960 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1111     avg: 1121     median: 1120.5 (48%)     max: 1130 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 416     avg: 418     median: 418 (46%)     max: 420 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 4033     avg: 4081     median: 4080.5 (10%)     max: 4128 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1984     avg: 2080     median: 2079.5 (13%)     max: 2175 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 208     avg: 209     median: 209 (63%)     max: 210 Points
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 44935     avg: 45912     median: 45912 (26%)     max: 46889 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4341     avg: 4476     median: 4476 (54%)     max: 4611 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.65     avg: 7.1     median: 7.1 (12%)     max: 7.57 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 545     avg: 611     median: 610.5 (8%)     max: 676 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 313     avg: 334.5     median: 334.5 (2%)     max: 356 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.756     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (16%)     max: 0.77 sec
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14374     avg: 14578     median: 14577.5 (39%)     max: 14781 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18547     avg: 18734     median: 18734 (33%)     max: 18921 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5015     avg: 5126     median: 5125.5 (22%)     max: 5236 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
2454 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 14114     avg: 14296     median: 14323.5 (56%)     max: 14422 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1669     avg: 1737     median: 1737 (73%)     max: 1805 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8618     avg: 9105     median: 9104.5 (16%)     max: 9591 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 454.4     avg: 760     median: 759.7 (1%)     max: 1065 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
79579 Points (70%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 114.2     avg: 199.6     median: 199.6 (57%)     max: 285 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 134.1     avg: 276.6     median: 276.6 (58%)     max: 419 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 978     avg: 1003     median: 1002.5 (38%)     max: 1027 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.7 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.3 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.89     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.46 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.89     avg: 5.5     median: 5.5 (6%)     max: 6.05 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 0% n=

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 01. 17:09:02

#0 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17591 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1719846541 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 01 Jul 2024 05:15:43 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.006s ... 0.013s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17591 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 17591 +0s ... 0.014s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.03s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.033s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)