Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 vs Intel Core i9-13900H vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ► remove from comparison
Der Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ist ein mobiler Prozessor für Notebooks. Er integriert erstmals die von Nuvia stammenden Oryon CPU-Kerne. Diese 12 (3 Cluster zu 4 Kernen) Kerne takten mit bis zu 3,4 GHz (kein höherer Dual-Core Boost wie bei den stärkeren Modellen) und nutzen den ARM v8.7 Befehlssatz. Die CPU-Leistung hängt stark vom eingesetzten TDP ein. Dieser kann von bis zu 80 Watt eingestellt werden.
Die Leistung der CPU-Kerne scheint bei angepasster Software hervorragend zu sein. Die Single-Core Performance im Cinebench 2024 kann mit den schnellsten Kernen von Apple (M3) und Intel mithalten bzw. diese sogar überholen. Unter Windows hat die CPU jedoch immer einen Nachteil bei nicht angepasster Software, da diese emuliert werden muss. Besonder Spiele sind hier stark betroffen, die oft nicht vernünftig laufen.
Zusätzlich zum CPU-Teil, integriert der X Elite eine starke NPU mit bis zu 45 TOPS für AI-Beschleunigung.
Die integrierte Grafikkarte ist etwas älter und unterstützt kein vollständiges DirectX 12 Ultimate (nur 12_1, jedoch inklusive Raytracing). Mit nur 3,8 TFLOPS bietet die GPU deutlich weniger Maximalleistung als in den Topmodellen (z.B. 4,6 TFLOPS im X1E-84-100).
Trotz der fehlenden Effizienzkerne, soll der Snapdragon X Elite laut Qualcomm sehr effizient sein. Der Chip wird im 4nm Prozess bei TSMC produziert. In unseren Tests ist die Effizienz etwas höher als bei den aktuellen Intel und AMD Modellen, aber leicht hinter Apple (M3).
Intel Core i9-13900H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-13900H ist eine High-End-CPU der Raptor-Lake-H Serie (RPL-H). Im Unterschied zu RPL-HX, ist die H-Serie sehr ähnlich zu den alten Alder-Lake-Prozessoren. Die CPU bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove oder Raptor Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,6 bis 5,4 GHz (Einzelkernturbo, 4,9 GHz für alle Kerne). Die E-Kerne takten von 1,9 - 4,1 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ).
Im Unterschied zum i9-13900HK , bietet der 13900H alle Features von vPro aber keine einfache Übertaktbarkeit.
Performance
Durch die höheren Tatkraten, kann der Core i9-13900H den älteren Core i9-12900H leicht abhängen und ist damit gemeinsam mit dem 13900HK die schnellste 45 Watt CPU von Intel. Bei ausreichender Kühlung, ist die CPU für alle Anwendungsbereiche hervorragend geeignet. Vor dem 13900H positionieren sich jedoch die HX-Modelle wie der i9-13980HX mit mehr E-Kernen und verbesserten P-Kernen.
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900H sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert.
Features
Wie auch Alder-Lake-H, hat Raptor-Lake-H WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt nun schnelleren DDR5-5200 Speicher. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist weiterhin in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt PCIe 5.0 x8 für eine dGPU und zwei PCIe 4.0 x4 für SSDs. Der PCH bietet noch PCIe Gen3 x12.
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-13900H ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 115 Watt). Gefertigt wird der 13900H im weiter verbesserten Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE ► remove from comparison
Der Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE ist ein mobiler Prozessor für Notebooks. Er integriert erstmals die von Nuvia stammenden Oryon CPU-Kerne. Diese 12 (3 Cluster mit je 4 Kernen) Kerne takten mit bis zu 4,3 GHz (maximal zwei Kerne, Rest mit 3,8 GHz) und nutzen den ARM v8.7 Befehlssatz. Die CPU-Leistung hängt stark vom eingesetzten TDP ein. Dieser kann von bis zu 80 Watt eingestellt werden.
Der X Elite X1E-00-1DE ist die zum Release die stärkste Variante und wird nur im Qualcomm Develepment Kit verbaut.
Model Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 Intel Core i9-13900H Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE Series Qualcomm Snapdragon X Intel Raptor Lake-H Qualcomm Snapdragon X Codename Oryon Raptor Lake-H Oryon Serie: Snapdragon X Oryon Clock <=3400 MHz 1900 - 5400 MHz 3800 - 4300 MHz Cores / Threads 12 / 12 14 / 20 12 / 12 TDP 35 Watt 45 Watt TDP Turbo PL2 45 Watt 80 Watt Technology 4 nm 10 nm 4 nm iGPU Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1500 MHz)Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS Architecture ARM x86 ARM Announced Manufacturer www.qualcomm.com ark.intel.com www.qualcomm.com L1 Cache 1.2 MB L2 Cache 11.5 MB L3 Cache 24 MB max. Temp. 100 °C Socket BGA1744 Features DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-5200/LPDDR5-6400/LPDDR5x-6400 RAM, PCIe 5, Thr. Dir., DL B., GNA, vPro Ent., RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - SD X Elite X1E-78-100
31.1 pt (52%)
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-13900H
40.9 pt (68%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 102.8 avg: 107 median: 108 (61%) max: 108 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 99% 100%
min: 101 avg: 102.7 median: 103 (58%) max: 104 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 98% 100% 96% 94%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 746 avg: 900 median: 875 (16%) max: 1132 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 93% 100%
min: 680 avg: 734 median: 703 (13%) max: 818 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 91% 100% 74% 86%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8353 avg: 9778 median: 9996 (9%) max: 10960 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 88% 100%
min: 11997 avg: 16813 median: 17471 (16%) max: 20385 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 60% 53% 71% 75% 73% 80% 93% 83% 94% 88% 76% 97% 91% 93% 97% 95% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1111 avg: 1125 median: 1130 (48%) max: 1130 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 99% 100%
min: 1297 avg: 1887 median: 1964.5 (83%) max: 2054 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 70% 55% 91% 90% 85% 96% 98% 94% 83% 97% 78% 99% 99% 100% 97% 98% 83%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 408 avg: 418.2 median: 420 (47%) max: 425 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 99% 100%
min: 428 avg: 720 median: 753 (83%) max: 792 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 65% 53% 91% 86% 85% 95% 99% 94% 82% 98% 73% 98% 99% 100% 96% 98% 83%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3168 avg: 3616 median: 3548 (9%) max: 4128 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 87% 100%
min: 4935 avg: 6533 median: 6808 (17%) max: 7716 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 56% 52% 73% 75% 75% 81% 93% 84% 94% 89% 76% 99% 91% 94% 98% 97% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1984 avg: 2155 median: 2175 (14%) max: 2351 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 90%
min: 2061 avg: 2676 median: 2666.5 (17%) max: 3100 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 76% 64% 79% 81% 81% 78% 76% 88% 96% 90% 79% 96% 85% 98% 98% 100% 98%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 208 avg: 211.6 median: 210 (59%) max: 216 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 99%
min: 211 avg: 268.9 median: 279 (78%) max: 297 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 77% 71% 89% 85% 85% 93% 97% 92% 82% 98% 82% 78% 97% 100% 96% 97% 96%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 27.48 avg: 28.5 median: 28.5 (37%) max: 29.65 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 96% 93% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 2.93 avg: 3 median: 3 (71%) max: 3 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 98% 99% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 9326 avg: 9502 median: 9550 (58%) max: 9630 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 97% 99% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 53438 avg: 54582 median: 53904 (39%) max: 56403 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 96% 95% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 76558 avg: 78476 median: 79014 (50%) max: 79856 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 96% 99% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 13515 avg: 13696 median: 13752 (17%) max: 13820 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 98% 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 179.496 avg: 340.6 median: 412.8 (5%) max: 429.446 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 100% 100% 103%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 3.141 avg: 3.4 median: 3.5 (1%) max: 3.521 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 100% 100% 100%
min: 6365 avg: 7489 median: 6800 (11%) max: 9303 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 68% 73% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 38047 avg: 44608 median: 44935 (26%) max: 49172 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 99% 100%
min: 45045 avg: 66435 median: 70166 (40%) max: 79032 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 65% 58% 74% 81% 83% 84% 90% 86% 95% 91% 76% 91% 90% 100% 88% 95% 98%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4341 avg: 4573 median: 4611 (54%) max: 4703 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 99% 100%
min: 3665 avg: 6054 median: 6276 (74%) max: 6600 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 77% 70% 93% 88% 87% 93% 94% 91% 85% 95% 77% 97% 100% 100% 95% 95% 94%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 110.15 avg: 120.9 median: 114 (38%) max: 138.55 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 80% 82% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 284 avg: 294 median: 297.5 (69%) max: 300.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 99% 100% 95%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 6.39 avg: 6.9 median: 6.7 (12%) max: 7.57 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 89% 100%
min: 14.1 avg: 18.5 median: 18.9 (33%) max: 22.3 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 46% 34% 74% 76% 75% 82% 91% 85% 94% 87% 76% 96% 86% 94% 82% 96% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (38%) max: 1.4 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 93% 86% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 2.3 avg: 2.4 median: 2.4 (41%) max: 2.5 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 92% 96% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 13.2 avg: 13.8 median: 13.3 (35%) max: 14.8 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 90% 89% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 545 avg: 619 median: 627 (8%) max: 676 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 101%
min: 279 avg: 348.7 median: 336 (4%) max: 467 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 102% 102% 103% 103% 103% 103% 104% 103% 103% 104% 103% 104% 103% 103% 104%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 313 avg: 361.2 median: 356 (3%) max: 428 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 100%
min: 166 avg: 205.4 median: 196 (1%) max: 268 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.724 avg: 0.7 median: 0.7 (16%) max: 0.77 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 100%
min: 0.4052 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.723 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 103% 100% 108% 107% 107% 108% 109% 109% 107% 108% 104% 109% 109% 109% 109% 109% 108%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 13869 avg: 14775 median: 14893 (32%) max: 15501 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W TDP 84 W 97% 94% 93% 98% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.156 avg: 7 median: 7.4 (2%) max: 7.512 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 13.784 avg: 15.5 median: 16.2 (1%) max: 16.436 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 350.453 avg: 397.4 median: 417.1 (2%) max: 424.723 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 55574 avg: 64502 median: 63194 (49%) max: 75108 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W TDP 84 W 78% 79% 93% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14324 avg: 14612 median: 14577.5 (37%) max: 14969 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 98% 100%
min: 15540 avg: 21781 median: 22343 (56%) max: 25420 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 75% 58% 81% 77% 82% 90% 95% 88% 86% 92% 80% 94% 88% 100% 80% 92% 73%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 83732 avg: 94385 median: 93901 (76%) max: 103874 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 100 W 92% 88% 86% 90% 100% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 85594 avg: 91529 median: 93285 (76%) max: 95474 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W 93% 97% 100% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 89904 avg: 94148 median: 95253 (79%) max: 98040 Points
CPU TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W 96% 98% 100% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
8244 Points (21%)
min: 12004 avg: 17867 median: 17844.5 (45%) max: 22184 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 72% 86% 71% 58% 84% 100% 99% 83% 95% 96% 99%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 18293 avg: 18644 median: 18547 (33%) max: 18972 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 99%
min: 17733 avg: 26658 median: 27039 (48%) max: 32664 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 68% 57% 79% 66% 77% 89% 93% 78% 94% 90% 74% 100% 89% 93% 69% 92% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4800 avg: 5126 median: 5227 (22%) max: 5352 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 97% 100%
min: 7863 avg: 11535 median: 11648 (49%) max: 13726 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 57% 38% 77% 80% 57% 93% 99% 79% 99% 90% 82% 99% 90% 98% 80% 100% 98%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 2354 avg: 2438 median: 2456 (63%) max: 2464 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 99% 100%
min: 2415 avg: 2640 median: 2645 (67%) max: 2807 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W TDP 84 W TDP 100 W 89% 89% 97% 98% 88% 95% 94% 95% 96% 99% 100%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 13287 avg: 14175 median: 14293 (56%) max: 14767 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 99% 100%
min: 11118 avg: 12749 median: 12611 (50%) max: 14404 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 70 W TDP 84 W TDP 100 W 96% 99% 84% 88% 77% 99% 100% 88% 98% 87% 84%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1576 avg: 1679 median: 1666.5 (65%) max: 1805 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 91% 100%
min: 1140 avg: 1895 median: 1955 (76%) max: 2043 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 84% 88% 94% 96% 85% 93% 100% 95% 84% 96% 73% 95% 96% 98% 97% 98% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6244 avg: 9624 median: 9104.5 (16%) max: 14043 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 100%
min: 9094 avg: 12649 median: 12890 (23%) max: 15410 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 74% 65% 80% 82% 70% 91% 100% 91% 94% 91% 77% 87% 79% 99% 89% 95% 94%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1654 avg: 1801 median: 1828.5 (8%) max: 1958 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 81 W TDP 115 W 86% 91% 99% 94% 100% 84%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11168 avg: 12381 median: 12212 (39%) max: 14172 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 81 W TDP 115 W 81% 81% 100% 89% 90% 97%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 7253 avg: 7955 median: 8190 (82%) max: 8498 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 100 W 87% 90% 97% 99% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 41851 avg: 47143 median: 45193 (45%) max: 54848 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 100 W 78% 80% 87% 92% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 450.7 avg: 454.4 median: 454 (1%) max: 459.8 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 100%
min: 456 avg: 507 median: 479 (1%) max: 828 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 79579 avg: 80351 median: 80385 (67%) max: 81088 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 99%
min: 85435 avg: 97010 median: 100627 (84%) max: 102947 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 115 W 78% 77% 98% 88% 100% 97% 98% 83%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 279 avg: 287.6 median: 286 (80%) max: 297 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 99%
min: 133.5 avg: 274 median: 283.5 (79%) max: 348 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 83% 84% 90% 84% 69% 84% 86% 85% 69% 84% 39% 85% 100% 85% 87% 84% 68%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 395 avg: 414.5 median: 420 (77%) max: 423 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 99% 100%
min: 171.4 avg: 301.6 median: 316 (58%) max: 340 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 87% 100% 71% 76% 79% 81% 78% 55% 75% 59% 76% 78% 81% 73% 63%
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 978 avg: 1180 median: 1241 (48%) max: 1401 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 79%
min: 1104 avg: 1871 median: 1912 (73%) max: 2146 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 73% 50% 99% 93% 87% 100% 97% 100% 95% 97% 77% 100% 94% 98% 100% 99% 88%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34 avg: 41.6 median: 44.7 (8%) max: 46.1 Watt
min: 38.1 avg: 100 median: 100.1 (17%) max: 154 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 120% 119% 123% 112% 113% 110% 112% 110% 111% 112% 100% 114% 109% 109% 108% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.3 Watt (12%)
min: 66.1 avg: 123.7 median: 114.8 (21%) max: 196.9 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 134% 132% 134% 132% 123% 107% 124% 113% 121% 127% 100% 126% 109% 104% 114% 114%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.89 avg: 5.7 median: 6.5 (4%) max: 9.3 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 102%
min: 2.9 avg: 13.7 median: 14.5 (10%) max: 28.1 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 109% 115% 110% 113% 100% 105% 111% 107% 108% 105% 108% 102% 105% 107% 102% 110% 102%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.55 avg: 6.2 median: 6.1 (7%) max: 9.2 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W 100% 100%
min: 4.85 avg: 13.3 median: 12.3 (14%) max: 24 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 70 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 90 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 121% 125% 119% 117% 110% 121% 120% 110% 118% 121% 100% 117% 119% 105% 110% 104%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 13.6 avg: 27.8 median: 22 (16%) max: 97.6 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 50 W TDP 51 W TDP 56 W TDP 60 W TDP 61 W TDP 65 W TDP 81 W TDP 84 W TDP 100 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 58% 100% 62% 44% 28% 46% 41% 46% 32% 53% 35% 44% 44%
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 → 0% n=0 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-13900H → 0% n=0
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 11. 03:25:22
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 17587 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14717 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 18130 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731291922s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17587 +0.004s ... 0.01s
#9 got single benchmarks 17587 +0.009s ... 0.019s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14717 +0.001s ... 0.021s
#11 got single benchmarks 14717 +0.006s ... 0.026s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 18130 +0.001s ... 0.027s
#13 got single benchmarks 18130 +0s ... 0.027s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.038s ... 0.065s
#16 return log +0s ... 0.065s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte