Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960s

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 665

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (SM6125) ist ein ARMv8-basierter SoC für Tablets und Smartphones aus dem gehobenen Mittelklasse-Segment. Die Prozessor-Einheit besitzt 8 Kerne, unterteilt in zwei Cluster: Die vier Hochleistungs-Kerne vom Typ Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73-Variante) takten mit bis zu 2 GHz, die vier Kerne für weniger aufwändige Aufgaben sind vom Typ Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53-Variante) und takten mit bis zu 1,8 GHz.

Als Grafikeinheit ist eine Adreno 610 integriert. Sie beherrscht mit OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 full, Vulkan 1.1, DX12 DSP alle momentan gängigen Grafik-APIs.

Verbaut ist auch ein Snapdragon X12 LTE-Modem, das im Downlink LTE Cat 12 mit bis zu 600 MBit/s unterstützt und im Uplink LTE Cat 13 mit bis zu 150 MBit/s.

HiSilicon Kirin 960s

► remove from comparison

Der HiSilicon Kirin 960s ist ein ARM-basierter Octa-Core-SoC der Mittelklasse für Smartphones und Tablets. Er wurde mit dem Huawei MediaPad M5 Anfang 2018 eingeführt und bietet zusätzlich zum ähnlichen HiSilicon Kirin 960 eine NPU zur AI-Beschleunigung aus dem Kirin 970. Anscheinend etwas niedriger getaktet als der normale Kirin 960.

Neben den 8 CPU-Kernen (4x Cortex-A73, 4x Cortex-A53) integriert der Chip auch eine moderne Mali-G71 MP8 Grafikeinheit, einen Dual-Channel LPDDR4-Speichercontroller sowie ein LTE Cat. 12/13 Modem. Ende 2016 zählt der Chip zu den schnellsten ARM-SoCs auf dem Markt.

Der Kirin 960 wird in einem modernen 16-Nanometer-Prozess von TSMC gefertigt.

show full text
ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 665HiSilicon Kirin 960s
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameKryo 260Cortex-A73/-A53
Serie: Cortex-A73/-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
HiSilicon Kirin 970 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960 compare2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 960s « 2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 710A compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73/-A53
Clock2200 MHz2100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology11 nm16 nm
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Specra 165 ISPARM Mali-G71 MP8 GPU, 4x Cortex-A73 (2.4 GHz) + 4x Cortex-A53 (1.8 GHz, big.LITTLE), 2x 32 Bit LPDDR4 Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G71 MP8 ( - 900 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 665
0.5 pt (38%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -67%
...
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -5%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 -4%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 -4%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 -3%
UNISOC T618
0.475 -3%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 -2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 -2%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 5%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 5%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 8%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 11%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
0.552 12%
Mediatek Helio G90T
0.571 16%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
0.575 17%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
0.596 21%
Mediatek Helio G95
0.602 22%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 164%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 17865     avg: 20749     median: 20024 (17%)     max: 24652 Points
14698 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2154     avg: 2377     median: 2379 (28%)     max: 2541 Points
2323 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2199     avg: 2369     median: 2370.5 (27%)     max: 2503 Points
2101 Points (24%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 309     avg: 311     median: 310.5 (12%)     max: 314 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1256     avg: 1356     median: 1371.5 (2%)     max: 1421 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (1%)     max: 315 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1327     avg: 1366     median: 1379 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1495     avg: 1509     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1536 Points
1634 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5134     avg: 5388     median: 5366 (6%)     max: 5663 Points
5809 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1706 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5609 Points (14%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5734 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1756 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2272 Points (18%)
2165 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
2767 Points (25%)
3780 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
10733 Points (21%)
10498 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
4516 Points (9%)
5303 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
6117 Points (16%)
6502 Points (17%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 4434     avg: 4783     median: 4562 (5%)     max: 6719 ms
5947 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 6133     avg: 8901     median: 9260 (8%)     max: 9671 Points
6802 Points (6%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 38     avg: 50.9     median: 51 (11%)     max: 58 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
108166 Points (37%)
147305 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
10308 Points (32%)
8364 Points (26%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
35460 Points (44%)
28103 Points (34%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
31064 Points (10%)
33870 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
63801 Points (39%)
43350 Points (27%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
140633 Points (25%)
113687 Points (20%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 26864     avg: 32727     median: 31707 (27%)     max: 45742 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 27018     avg: 36247     median: 37857 (31%)     max: 44461 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 32489     avg: 33693     median: 33527 (6%)     max: 34855 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 62570     avg: 68985     median: 70133 (25%)     max: 71112 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 167305     avg: 171951     median: 169695 (16%)     max: 181432 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 665 +
172978 Points (23%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
13.4 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
151 MB/s (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
11.3 MB/s (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
256 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 665 +
7618 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 665 +
6505 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 3249     avg: 3328     median: 3328 (18%)     max: 3407 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 9865     avg: 10707     median: 10707 (23%)     max: 11549 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 6189     avg: 6985     median: 6560.5 (43%)     max: 11432 Points
5114 Points (33%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 7437     avg: 8163     median: 8085 (40%)     max: 9051 Points
5040 Points (25%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 665 +
3.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 665 +
1.2 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 → 100% n=20

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 960s → 94% n=20

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 19. 10:46:06

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11487 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9952 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1726735565s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Sep 2024 05:16:12 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.034s ... 0.034s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.034s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11487 +0.005s ... 0.039s

#8 got single benchmarks 11487 +0.014s ... 0.053s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9952 +0.001s ... 0.054s

#10 got single benchmarks 9952 +0.003s ... 0.057s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.057s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.088s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.091s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)