Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 vs Mediatek MT6739WW

Qualcomm Snapdragon 450

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 450

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 (SD450) ist ein unterer Mittelklasse SoC für (Android basierende) Smartphones und Tablets. Er bietet acht ARM Cortex-A53 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz Taktrate und wird bereits im modernen und stromsparenden 14nm Prozess gefertigt. Das Integrierte X9 LTE Modem unterstützt Cat. 7 und dadurch maximal 300 Mbps Download und 150 Mbps Upload. Weiters ist eine Adreno 506 Grafikkarte integriert mit Support für Vulkan und OpenGL ES 3.1. WLAN wir 802.11ac unterstützt (1x1 MU-MIMO max. 364 Mbps) und Bluetooth in der Version 4.1. Der Speicherkontroller unterstützt LPDDR3 (single channel). Die Videoengine unterstützt 1080p H.264 Encode und Decode und HEVC Decode.

Mediatek MT6739WW

► remove from comparison  MT6739WW

Der Mediatek MT6739WW ist ein 2017 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Einstiegsklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,5 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine PowerVR GE8100 mit maximal 570 MHz Taktrate zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL), WLAN 802.11 a/b/g/n sowie ein Videodecoder mit Ultra-HD- und H.265-Unterstützung. Der Unterschied zum normalen Mediatek MT6739 ist nicht bekannt, die Leistung ist vergleichbar.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 450Mediatek MT6739WW
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon Mediatek
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 « 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW « 1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1800 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology14 nm28 nm
FeaturesAdreno 506 GPU, X9 LTE Modem (300 / 150 Mbps)4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPU
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 506PowerVR GE8100 ( - 570 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 450
0.2 pt (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 SD 450 +
11735 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 13596     avg: 14216     median: 14036.5 (12%)     max: 15273 Points
10230 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1529     avg: 1773     median: 1789.5 (17%)     max: 1826 Points
655 Points (6%)
669 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 131     avg: 140.3     median: 131 (5%)     max: 159 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 493     avg: 631     median: 498 (1%)     max: 902 Points
589 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3272     avg: 3862     median: 3907 (4%)     max: 4022 Points
1718 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 709     avg: 733     median: 732.5 (10%)     max: 756 Points
614 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3625     avg: 3691     median: 3690.5 (9%)     max: 3756 Points
1681 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3963     avg: 3981     median: 3980.5 (6%)     max: 3998 Points
1525 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
707 Points (11%)
549 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
min: 737     avg: 747     median: 746.5 (6%)     max: 756 Points
653 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
min: 1708     avg: 2113     median: 2112.5 (19%)     max: 2517 Points
1791 Points (16%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
min: 5993     avg: 6011     median: 6010.5 (12%)     max: 6028 Points
2544 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
min: 3340     avg: 3381     median: 3381 (7%)     max: 3422 Points
1355 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
min: 3683     avg: 3784     median: 3783.5 (10%)     max: 3884 Points
1788 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11012     avg: 11506     median: 11492.5 (13%)     max: 11863 ms
16008 ms (19%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3470     avg: 3981     median: 3997 (3%)     max: 4115 Points
3213 Points (3%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 28     avg: 31.3     median: 31.5 (6%)     max: 34 Points
27 Points (5%)
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 54731     avg: 57703     median: 57827.5 (20%)     max: 60077 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 4090     avg: 5355     median: 5158 (16%)     max: 7614 Points
3565 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 17204     avg: 19521     median: 19734 (24%)     max: 20891 Points
14593 Points (18%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 11937     avg: 12110     median: 12147 (4%)     max: 12208 Points
3084 Points (1%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 33473     avg: 34106     median: 33975 (21%)     max: 35092 Points
22448 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 56497     avg: 69869     median: 71167 (13%)     max: 73468 Points
43690 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 26309     avg: 28038     median: 28107 (24%)     max: 29697 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 13168     avg: 16031     median: 15671 (13%)     max: 19253 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 9371     avg: 9408     median: 9408 (2%)     max: 9444 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 28376     avg: 35468     median: 38797 (14%)     max: 39230 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 450 +
min: 89022     avg: 92277     median: 90185 (9%)     max: 97624 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
0 Iter./s (0%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
0 Iter./s (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
101906 Points (13%)
49040 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
100%
1 SD 450 +
652 min (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 2140     avg: 2239     median: 2157 (11%)     max: 2583 Points
2260 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 3145     avg: 5094     median: 4391 (9%)     max: 7635 Points
1839 Points (4%)
0 Points (0%)
4408 Points (22%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6739WW → 60% n=27

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 29. 14:55:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9946 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11387 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735480530s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Dec 2024 05:18:56 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9946 +0.002s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 9946 +0.013s ... 0.021s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11387 +0.001s ... 0.021s

#10 got single benchmarks 11387 +0.004s ... 0.025s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.022s ... 0.047s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.048s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.051s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.001s ... 0.052s

#16 return log +0.001s ... 0.053s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)