Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 vs Mediatek MT8735

Qualcomm Snapdragon 439

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 439

Der Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 (SD439) ist ein unterer Mittelklasse SoC für (Android basierende) Smartphones und Tablets. Er wird im Gegensatz zum Snapdragon 435 bereits im deutlich moderneren 12nm FinFET Verfahren gefertigt und taktet die 8 ARM Cortex-A53 Kerne mit 2 GHz deutlich höher. Die integrierte Adreno 505 Grafikkarte bleibt gleich und beim LTE Modem gibt es sogar einen Rückschritt (X6 mit nur Cat 4 Download 150 Mbps, Cat 5 Upload 75 Mbps). Drahtlos unterstützt der 439 mit 802.11ac (Wifi 5) WLAN und Bluetooth 5 relativ moderne Standards.

Mediatek MT8735

► remove from comparison MT8735

Der Mediatek MT8735 ist ein 2015 vorgestellter ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Mittelklasse, der primär in Smartphones (hauptsächlich Android) zu finden ist. Er wird in 28 Nanometern gefertigt und verfügt über vier CPU-Kerne auf Basis der 64-Bit-fähigen Cortex-A53-Architektur, die mit maximal 1,3 GHz takten. Als Grafikeinheit kommt eine ARM Mali-T720MP2 zum Einsatz. Weiterhin integriert sind unter anderem ein LTE-Modem inkl. CDMA2000 und 5GHz Dual-Band 802.11bgn WiFi. 

Die Leistung liegt im Bereich der älteren MT6735 (jedoch mit bis zu 1.5 GHz getaktet) SoCs im Einstiegsbereich.

show full text
ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 439Mediatek MT8735
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon Mediatek
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock2000 MHz1300 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 84 / 4
Technology12 nm28 nm
FeaturesAdreno 505 GPU, 802.11ac Wave 2WLAN, Bluetooth 5.0, X6 LTE Cat 4/5 (150 / 75 Mbps),4G FDD LTE, TDD LTE, HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, CDMA200 and EDGE, Dual-band Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, 16MP image signal-processor, 1280x800 display, FM receiver, GPS/Glonass/Baidou
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 505ARM Mali-T720
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 439
0.3 pt (23%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -45%
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D
0.1709 -42%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
0.1785 -39%
MediaTek MT8168
0.1792 -39%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429
0.2028 -31%
Samsung Exynos 7904
0.2136 -28%
Mediatek Helio G25
0.2329 -21%
Mediatek MT8768
0.2861 -3%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
0.2949
Mediatek Helio A25
0.3082 5%
Mediatek Helio P23 MT6763V
0.3136 6%
Mediatek Helio G35
0.3157 7%
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765
0.3349 14%
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3354 14%
Samsung Exynos 850
0.3734 27%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
0.4139 40%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
0.4418 50%
Mediatek Helio P65
0.4442 51%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 341%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 12096     avg: 12492     median: 12492.5 (10%)     max: 12809 Points
min: 9076     avg: 10221     median: 10473 (9%)     max: 11114 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 1500     avg: 1597     median: 1608 (19%)     max: 1657 Points
min: 856     avg: 860     median: 861 (10%)     max: 864 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 1516     avg: 1588     median: 1598 (18%)     max: 1618 Points
min: 809     avg: 858     median: 833 (10%)     max: 931 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 439 +
176 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 439 +
823 Points (1%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 176     avg: 176.7     median: 177 (1%)     max: 177 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 809     avg: 819     median: 812 (3%)     max: 836 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 863     avg: 880     median: 877.5 (9%)     max: 903 Points
min: 588     avg: 618     median: 617.5 (6%)     max: 647 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2987     avg: 3141     median: 3154 (3%)     max: 3267 Points
min: 1697     avg: 1765     median: 1765 (2%)     max: 1833 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
863 Points (12%)
597 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3218 Points (8%)
1651 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 439 +
3636 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 439 +
792 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 439 +
712 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 439 +
1563 Points (14%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 439 +
5986 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 439 +
3444 Points (7%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 439 +
3684 Points (10%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 9768     avg: 9963     median: 9952.5 (12%)     max: 10143 ms
min: 12334     avg: 13079     median: 13199 (15%)     max: 13705 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 4512     avg: 4731     median: 4755.5 (4%)     max: 4958 Points
min: 2290     avg: 2773     median: 2718 (2%)     max: 3312 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 32     avg: 35.2     median: 35.5 (7%)     max: 38 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 59539     avg: 60585     median: 60585 (21%)     max: 61631 Points
min: 34009     avg: 34778     median: 34148 (12%)     max: 36177 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 4849     avg: 5390     median: 5051 (16%)     max: 6271 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 19841     avg: 21900     median: 22846 (28%)     max: 23014 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 12224     avg: 12439     median: 12514 (4%)     max: 12579 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 37733     avg: 37810     median: 37769 (23%)     max: 37928 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 75175     avg: 77540     median: 77652 (14%)     max: 79792 Points
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 6969     avg: 12860     median: 13894 (12%)     max: 16684 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 27672     avg: 29440     median: 29676.5 (24%)     max: 30734 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 9258     avg: 10049     median: 10067 (2%)     max: 10803 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 40746     avg: 41220     median: 41221.5 (15%)     max: 41690 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 84645     avg: 93569     median: 95218 (9%)     max: 99193 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 SD 439 +
105520 Points (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 2490     avg: 2557     median: 2556.5 (14%)     max: 2623 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 439 +
min: 4775     avg: 5213     median: 5212.5 (11%)     max: 5650 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 4412     avg: 4632     median: 4643.5 (30%)     max: 4791 Points
min: 2980     avg: 2981     median: 2980.5 (19%)     max: 2981 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 5880     avg: 6095     median: 6115 (31%)     max: 6228 Points
min: 3617     avg: 3822     median: 3902 (20%)     max: 3948 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8735 → 44% n=17

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 24. 03:33:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11405 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8215 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732415624s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:17:24 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11405 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 11405 +0.008s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8215 +0.001s ... 0.016s

#10 got single benchmarks 8215 +0.007s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.036s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.037s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.038s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.039s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.039s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.044s

#18 return log +0s ... 0.045s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)