Notebookcheck Logo

Apple S5 vs Apple S9 SiP vs Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

Apple S5

► remove from comparison Apple S5

Der Apple S5 ist ein 64-Bit-Prozessor mit zwei Kernen der in der Apple Watch Series 5 (40 und 44 mm) eingesetzt wird. Er integriert 32 GB Speicher, Bluetooth 5.0, 1 GB RAM, 802.11 b/g/n 2.4 GHz WLAN und Satelliten Positionierung (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS).

Apple S9 SiP

► remove from comparison Apple S9

Das Apple S9 SiP (System in a Package) ist ein 64-Bit-Prozessor mit zwei Kernen (Sawtooth Dual-Core) der in der Apple Watch Series 9 eingesetzt wird. Die beiden CPU-Kerne basieren auf die Architektur im Apple A15 SoC. Weiters beinhaltet der Chip erstmals eine Neural Engine (mit 4 Kernen) für AI Tasks.

Der S9 bietet 64 GB internen Speicher, L1 GPS, GNSS, Galileo und BaeiDou, WLAN 4 (802.11n), Bluetooth 5.3), und LTE / UMTS (optional). Ebenso ist der Ultrabreitband-Chip Apple U1 integriert.

Der Chip wird im modernen 4nm Prozess bei TSMC (N4P) hergestellt.

Telechips TCC8803 1GHz

► remove from comparison TCC8803 1GHz

ARM Mali 2D/3D graphics accelerator, DDR / DDR2 / LP-DDR2 / LP-DDR2 memory interface, LVDS Transmitter, HDMI 1.4, Composite TV-Out (NTSC / PAL), USB 2.0 HS OTG, USB 2.0 host, USB 1.1 HOST, EHI (External Host Interface), UART, NAND Flash Interface

Telechips' TCC88xx application processor will redefine the mobile device of tomorrow with new' innovative user experience by PC-like web browsing, 1080p full HD video record & playback, intuitive user interfaces, location based services and next generation social networking applications. TCC88xx supports development of planned features for the Tablet PC and HMP of tomorrow with tremendous performance and programmability to support new applications yet to be imagined. TCC88xx is equipped with hardwired VPU/GPU/ISP to maximize multimedia experience at its peak level.

 

show full text
ModelApple S5Apple S9 SiPTelechips TCC8803 1GHz
SeriesApple Apple
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 « 2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Apple S9 SiP « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores Thunder
Apple S81.8 GHz2 / 2 cores Thunder
Apple S71.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Apple S61.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 21 / 1
Announced
CodenameThunder
Clock1800 MHz1000 MHz
Technology4 nm65 nm
ArchitectureARMARM

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
13.4 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 S9 +
min: 46038.4     avg: 46196     median: 46195.8 (54%)     max: 46353.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 S5 +
min: 2014     avg: 2022     median: 2022 (22%)     max: 2030 ms
223%
1 S9 +
min: 902.3     avg: 905     median: 905 (10%)     max: 907.7 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
0 Points (0%)

Average Benchmarks Apple S5 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Apple S9 SiP → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Telechips TCC8803 1GHz → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 01. 08:21:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11530 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 16392 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3327 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1730445679s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 01 Nov 2024 05:17:03 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.055s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.055s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11530 +0.001s ... 0.056s

#9 got single benchmarks 11530 +0.004s ... 0.06s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 16392 +0.001s ... 0.06s

#11 got single benchmarks 16392 +0.004s ... 0.064s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3327 +0.001s ... 0.065s

#13 got single benchmarks 3327 +0.003s ... 0.068s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.068s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.07s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.07s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.07s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)