Notebookcheck Logo

Apple S5 vs Samsung Exynos W920

Apple S5

► remove from comparison Apple S5

Der Apple S5 ist ein 64-Bit-Prozessor mit zwei Kernen der in der Apple Watch Series 5 (40 und 44 mm) eingesetzt wird. Er integriert 32 GB Speicher, Bluetooth 5.0, 1 GB RAM, 802.11 b/g/n 2.4 GHz WLAN und Satelliten Positionierung (GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, QZSS).

Samsung Exynos W920

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos W920

Der Samsung Exynos W920 ist ein Dual-Core ARM SoC für IoT (Internet of Things) Devices aus 2021. Er integriert zwei ARM Cortex-A55 Kerne mit 1,18 GHz und wird im modernen 5nm Prozess gefertigt. Er integriert eine ARM Mali-G68 MP2 GPU, ein LTE Cat.4 150Mbps Download / Cat.5 75 Mbps Upload Modem und Unterstützung für eMMC 16GB und LPDDR4 12 GB. Videos können mit Full HD und 30fps aufgenommen werden und in HEVC (H.265), H.264 und VP8 en- und dekodiert werden.

show full text
ModelApple S5Samsung Exynos W920
SeriesApple Samsung
Serie: ARM Cortex-A55
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G compare cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 « 2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
Rockchip RK3566 compare - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos W930 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Samsung Exynos W920 « 1.18 GHz2 / 2 cores ARM Cortex-A55
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
Announced
CodenameARM Cortex-A55
Clock1180 MHz
Technology5 nm
FeaturesMali-G68MP2, qHD 960x540 Display Support, LTE Cat.4 150Mbps DL / Cat.5 75Mbps UL, GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo), LPDDR4 (12Gb), FHD 30fps video
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP2
ArchitectureARM

Benchmarks

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 18706.2     avg: 19377     median: 19376.6 (23%)     max: 20047 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
S5 +
min: 2014     avg: 2022     median: 2022 (22%)     max: 2030 ms
min: 2730     avg: 2861     median: 2804 (31%)     max: 3048.2 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1990     avg: 2060     median: 2023 (2%)     max: 2166 Points

Average Benchmarks Apple S5 → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W920 → 72% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 05. 21:39:09

#0 ran 1s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11530 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13823 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728157149s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2024 05:16:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11530 +0.001s ... 0.028s

#8 got single benchmarks 11530 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13823 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#10 got single benchmarks 13823 +0.004s ... 0.035s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.037s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.04s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)