Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Radeon IGP 320M vs ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP vs ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

ATI Radeon IGP 320M

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon IGP 320M

Der ATI Radeon IGP 320M ist ein onboard (shared Memory) Grafikchip fürMobile-Athlon-XP-basierte. Dual Display, Powerplay, DDR266 Speicher Support (1 GB max). Die integrierte Grafik stamm vom ATI Mobility Radeon Grafikkern ab, bietet jedoch keinen eigenen Grafikspeicher. Dadurch unterstützt die Grafik auch kein Hardware T&L (Transfer & Lightning).

Dank Hydravision sollte der Chip zwei Displays ansteuern können und mittels PowerPlay kann Strom gespart werden.

Der ATI Radeon IGP 340M ist die Intel Pentium 4-M Version des Chipsatzes.

Einen ausführlichen Test des Chipsatzes gibt es bei Tomshardware.

ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP

► remove from comparison

Der ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP ist ein nboard (shared Memory) Grafikchip für Intel Pentium 4M-basierte Notebooks. Dual Display, Powerplay, DDR333 Speicher Support (4 GB max). ATI Mobility Radeon Grafikkern (ohne eigenen Speicher). Im Vergleich zu den ebenfalls auf diese Grafikkarte basierende IGP 320M und 340M, soll der 7000 IGP zum Performance Segment gehören und dadurch minimal schneller sein.

ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP

► remove from comparison

Der ATI Radeon 9100 (PRO) IGP ist ein onboard (shared Memory) Grafikchip mit Codename RS350. Da die Karte nur DirectX 8.1 unterstützt ist sie nicht Aero tauglich. Im Vergleich zur ATI Radeon 9000 (PRO) IGP, besitzt der Chipsatz eine Dual Channel Speicheranbindung und ist daher minimal schneller (auch die Grafik).

show full text
ATI Radeon IGP 320MATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGPATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP
Mobility Radeon IGP Serie
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP
Radeon IGP 340M @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Pipelines0 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader0 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader2 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Kerntakt160 MHz400 MHz
Shared Memoryjajanein
APIDirectX 7DirectX 7DirectX 8.1
Features
  • HyperZ™ memory optimization technology
  • Pixel Tapestry™ architecture
  • Multi-texturing with 3 texture units
  • On-chip texel, pixel, and vertex caches
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Support for Emboss, Dot-Product 3, and Cubic Environment bump mapping
  • Bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering
  • Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Alpha blending
  • Exponential pixel fog
  • 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer, 32-bit or 16-bit W buffer, and 8-bit Stencil buffer
  • Extensive 3D mode support
  • Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes
  • HyperZ™ memory optimization technology
  • Pixel Tapestry™ architecture
  • Multi-texturing with 3 texture units
  • On-chip texel, pixel, and vertex caches
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Support for Emboss, Dot-Product 3, and Cubic Environment bump mapping
  • Bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering
  • Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Alpha blending
  • Exponential pixel fog
  • 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer, 32-bit or 16-bit W buffer, and 8-bit Stencil buffer
  • Extensive 3D mode support
  • Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes
  • Hardware with Pixel Shader 1.4 support
  • Supports up to 2048x1536 @ 32bpp.
  • Anisotropic texture filtering and Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
Erscheinungsdatum05.10.2002 01.03.2003 23.06.2003
Herstellerseiteati.amd.comati.amd.comati.amd.com
CodenameR100RS350
Shadertakt300 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
1537 Points (2%)
min: 1450     avg: 1625     median: 1625 (2%)     max: 1800 Points
min: 1600     avg: 2680     median: 2680 (3%)     max: 3760 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 70     avg: 82.5     median: 82.5 (0%)     max: 95 Points
min: 90     avg: 370     median: 370 (0%)     max: 650 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon IGP 320M → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP → 106% n=1

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP → 174% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.28
log 22. 15:24:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1911 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 173 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734877466s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1911 +0.018s ... 0.038s

#10 got single benchmarks 1911 +0.003s ... 0.041s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0s ... 0.041s

#12 got single benchmarks 171 +0.003s ... 0.044s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 173 +0s ... 0.044s

#14 got single benchmarks 173 +0.003s ... 0.047s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.05s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.05s

#18 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.05s

#19 return log +0s ... 0.051s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)