Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) vs NVIDIA T1000

AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

► remove from comparison AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Die AMD Radeon Graphics der Ryzen 7000 Desktop CPUs ist eine integrierte Grafikkarte (iGPU) mit 2 CUs (128 Shader). Sie befindet sich in den Ryzen 7000 Prozessoren und nutzt wie die Radeon 610M die aktuelle RDNA 2 Architektur. Je nach Prozessormodell taktet sie von 400 - 2200 MHz. Weiters integriert die GPU auch eine AMD Video Coding Engine (VCE) um H.264 und H.265 10/8bpc enkodieren und AV1, VP9, H.265, H.264 in 10 und 8bpc dekodieren zu können.

NVIDIA T1000

► remove from comparison

Die Nvidia T1000 Desktop ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für kleine Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf dem selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce GTX1650. Auch die Anzahl der Shadereinheiten ist mit 896 identisch. Mit 8-GB-VRAM bietet die Nvidia T1000 mehr VRAM, welcher weiterhin über ein 128 Bit Speicherbus angebunden ist. Die Leistungsaufnahme der Nvidia T1000 beträgt nur 50 Watt und kommt daher ohne einen zusätzlichen Stromanschluss aus.

Die professionellen Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.

AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)NVIDIA T1000
Quadro Turing Serie
Radeon 680M compare 768 @ 2.4 GHz
Radeon 660M compare 384 @ 1.9 GHz
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) 128 @ 2.2 GHz
Radeon 610M compare 128 @ 0.4 - 2.2 GHz
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop) compare 4608 @ 1.28 - 1.46 GHz384 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop) compare 3072 @ 1.04 - 1.55 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q compare 3072 @ 0.6 - 1.35 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop) compare 2560 @ 1.11 - 1.56 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q compare 2560 @ 0.78 - 1.38 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) compare 1920 @ 0.95 - 1.38 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q compare 1920 @ 0.6 - 1.22 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) compare 1024 @ 1.58 - 1.79 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T2000 Max-Q compare 1024 @ 0.93 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T1000 896 @ 1.07 - 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T1200 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 0.86 - 1.43 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) compare 768 @ 1.4 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
Quadro T1000 Max-Q compare 768 @ 0.8 - 1.46 GHz128 Bit @ 8000 MHz
T600 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.4 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T550 Laptop GPU compare 1024 @ 1.07 - 1.67 GHz64 Bit @ 12000 MHz
T500 Laptop GPU compare 896 @ 1.37 - 1.7 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
T600 compare 640 @ 0.74 - 1.34 GHz128 Bit @ 10000 MHz
CodenameRaphael
ArchitekturRDNA 2Turing
Pipelines128 - unified896 - unified
TMUs856
ROPs432
Raytracing Cores1
Kerntakt2200 (Boost) MHz1065 - 1395 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryjanein
APIDirectX 12_2, OpenGL 4.6DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.8, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Transistors3.4 Billion4.7 Billion
Die Size 122 mm² 200 mm²
Herstellungsprozess6 nm12 nm
Erscheinungsdatum26.09.2022 06.05.2021
Theoretical Performance5000 TFLOPS FP16, 2500 TFLOPS FP32, 0.7812 TFLOPS FP64
Speichertakt10000 effective = 1250 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR6
Max. Speichergröße8 GB
Memory Bandwidth160 GB/s
Stromverbrauch50 Watt
PCIe3.0 x16
Displays4 Displays (max.), DisplayPort 1.4a
CPU in Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X16 x 4500 MHz, 170 W400 MHz2200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D16 x 4200 MHz, 120 W400 MHz2200 MHz
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X12 x 4700 MHz, 170 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.400 MHz2200 MHz

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
1 pt (3%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - T1000
3.7 pt (11%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 817     avg: 831     median: 831 (2%)     max: 845 Points
3534 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 705     avg: 715     median: 715 (2%)     max: 725 Points
3088 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
159603 Points (16%)
398761 Points (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 59739     avg: 64109     median: 66294 (8%)     max: 66294 Points
179865 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15883     avg: 16468     median: 16760 (16%)     max: 16760 Points
37881 Points (36%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 14990     avg: 15161     median: 15247 (4%)     max: 15247 Points
50553 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 2183     avg: 2211     median: 2211 (4%)     max: 2239 Points
8124 Points (14%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2287     avg: 2338     median: 2337.5 (3%)     max: 2388 Points
8450 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 90272     avg: 97292     median: 100802 (11%)     max: 100802 Points
237130 Points (26%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
10411 Points (10%)
34584 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
10021 Points (4%)
41157 Points (16%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 3466     avg: 3636     median: 3466 (4%)     max: 3977 Points
12953 Points (17%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3026     avg: 3170     median: 3026 (3%)     max: 3458 Points
11793 Points (10%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
min: 11455     avg: 11703     median: 11703 (3%)     max: 11951 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T1000
46318 Points (13%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
min: 8837     avg: 9054     median: 9053.5 (5%)     max: 9270 Points
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T1000
39668 Points (22%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 36694     avg: 37469     median: 37468.5 (41%)     max: 38243 Points
78565 Points (86%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
3DMark 06
min: 20707     avg: 21111     median: 21110.5 (28%)     max: 21514 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T1000
58968 Points (77%)
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
9.9 fps (3%)
42.2 fps (13%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (24%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
100%
1 T1000 +
159 Seconds (59%)
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
39.3 fps (26%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
18.1 fps (12%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
78.1 fps (38%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
37.3 fps (23%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
100%
1 T1000 +
44 fps (14%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
13.4 fps (13%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
62.8 fps (10%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
9.5 fps (1%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
43.3 fps (21%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
21.9 fps (14%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA T1000
SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
100%
1 T1000 +
27.4 fps (11%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6826     avg: 15239     median: 17737.5 (13%)     max: 18855 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA T1000
6837 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 198.52     avg: 203     median: 205 (67%)     max: 205.43 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
252.5 fps (83%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 97.22     avg: 158.8     median: 101.4 (6%)     max: 359.59 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
335.8 fps (20%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
min: 97.9     avg: 98.3     median: 97.9 (98%)     max: 99.6 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T1000
99.6 % (100%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
1992 fps (13%)
386 fps (2%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
176.8 fps (40%)
31.9 fps (7%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
6167 Points (2%)
38611 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
8032 Points (2%)
36031 Points (10%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
257 Samples/s (1%)
1987 Samples/s (7%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
583 Samples/s (1%)
4129 Samples/s (7%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
1616 Points (2%)
6369 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
101.9 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 T1000 +
156.8 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
100%
1 T1000 +
0.1 fps per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T1000 → 336% n=29

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

F1 24

F1 24

2024
low 1920x1080
T1000:
98.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
82.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
22  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
19  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
10  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
138.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
90.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
50.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
39.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
44  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
38  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45.1  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
34.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
28.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
23.8  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
45  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
35.2  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
30.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
29.5  fps
F1 23

F1 23

2023
low 1920x1080
T1000:
108.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
96.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
63.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
69.2  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
55.6  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
35.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
27.6  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
125.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
91.3  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
69.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
49.7  fps
low 1920x1080
T1000:
51.8  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
42.5  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
21.4  fps
Far Cry 6

Far Cry 6

2021
low 1280x720
T1000:
110.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
56.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
47.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
40.3  fps
F1 2021

F1 2021

2021
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
46.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
18.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
15  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
5.7  fps
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
49.7  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
18.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
13.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
8.7  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
151  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
38.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
28.6  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
195.9  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
60  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
37.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
24.1  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
117  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
58  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
T1000:
102.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
45.9  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
33  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
26.1  fps
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
54  fps
419%
T1000:
226  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
17.4  fps
501%
T1000:
87.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
11.4  fps
609%
T1000:
69.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
9  fps
666%
T1000:
59.9  fps
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
T1000:
127  fps
med. 1920x1080
T1000:
62  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
57  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
53  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
35.9 49.8 ~ 43 fps
491%
T1000:
211  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
23 29.2 ~ 26 fps
561%
T1000:
145.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
20.5 25.9 ~ 23 fps
566%
T1000:
130.1  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
19.3 26.1 ~ 23 fps
440%
T1000:
101.3  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
12.2 19.3 ~ 16 fps
308%
T1000:
49.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
5.7 8.9 ~ 7 fps
517%
T1000:
36.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
157.8 219.5 ~ 189 fps
130%
T1000:
246.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
61.8 89.9 ~ 76 fps
286%
T1000:
217.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
25.7 38.8 ~ 32 fps
470%
T1000:
150.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000):
23.6 35 ~ 29 fps
471%
T1000:
136.5  fps
low 1024x768
T1000:
188.8  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
113.8  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
63.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
35.2  fps
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
T1000:
187.4  fps
med. 1366x768
T1000:
187.1  fps
high 1920x1080
T1000:
103.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
T1000:
50.2  fps

Average Gaming AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA T1000 → 460%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 525%

NVIDIA T1000lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 2498.482.658.8
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora22191510
Total War Pharaoh138.690.850.639.8
Assassin's Creed Mirage444038
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty45.134.228.323.8
Baldur's Gate 34535.230.229.5
F1 23108.396.563.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands69.255.635.327.6
GRID Legends125.491.369.649.7
God of War51.842.533.521.4
Far Cry 6110.456.947.440.3
Borderlands 31516038.228.6
Total War: Three Kingdoms195.96037.324.1
Far Cry New Dawn117625853
Metro Exodus102.345.93326.1
Strange Brigade22687.269.459.9
Far Cry 5127625753
X-Plane 11.11211145.8130.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark101.349.336.2
Dota 2 Reborn246.2217.7150.4136.5
The Witcher 3188.8113.863.935.2
GTA V187.4187.1103.550.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4
7
10
1
8
10
3
2
13
5
2
8
8

1






AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)lowmed.highultraQHD4K
F1 202146.318.3155.66
F1 202049.718.713.78.67
Strange Brigade5417.411.49
X-Plane 11.11432623
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark23167
Dota 2 Reborn189763229
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
4

1
5

1
5
1

4








Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 20:04:59

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12782 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731524699s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.05s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.05s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.05s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11422 +0.024s ... 0.074s

#9 got single benchmarks 11422 +0.008s ... 0.082s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12782 +0.004s ... 0.086s

#11 got single benchmarks 12782 +0.004s ... 0.09s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.09s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.031s ... 0.121s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.121s

#15 Got 115 rows for game benchmarks. +0.008s ... 0.129s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.129s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.131s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.138s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.138s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.14s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)