Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3168 vs UNISOC Tangula T700 vs ARM Cortex-M4

Rockchip RK3168

► remove from comparison

Der Rockchip RK3168 ist ein günstiger ARM-SoC, der in erster Linie für Smartphones konzipiert wurde. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU-Kerne mit NEON-Erweiterung, eine PowerVR SGX 540 Grafikkarte (400 MHz) und einen Speichercontroller für (LP-)DDR2/DDR3. Die Performance sollte mit anderen, ähnlich getakteten Cortex-A9-SoCs wie dem Samsung Exynos 4210 vergleichbar sein. Dank fortschrittlicher 28-Nanometer-Fertigung dürfte der RK3168 aber deutlich weniger Energie benötigen und somit längere Akkulaufzeiten ermöglichen.

UNISOC Tangula T700

► remove from comparison UNISOC Tangula T700

Der Unisoc Tangula T700 ist ein Prozessor der unteren Mittelklasse mit zwei schnellen ARM Cortex-A75 Kernen und bis zu 1.8 GHz Taktrate und 6 Cortex-A55 Stromsparkernen mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. er bietet ähnliche Spezifikationen wie der Unisoc Tiger T618 bzw T610.

Er integriert ein LTE Modem (TDD-LTE, FDD-LTE, TDSCDMA, WCDMA, CDMA, GSM) und einen Tri-Core-ISP namens Vivimagic 5.0. Zudem ist die Nutzung von 90-Hz-Bildschirmen möglich. Die integrierte ARM Mali G52 MP2 Grafikkarte bietet zwei Kerne und der gesamte SoC wird bei TSMC im 12nm FinFet Prozess hergestellt. 

ARM Cortex-M4

► remove from comparison

show full text
ModelRockchip RK3168UNISOC Tangula T700ARM Cortex-M4
Series UNISOC
Serie:
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
UNISOC T6191.8 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6182 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6161.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72251.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC T6101.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
Unisoc T72001.6 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A75 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T700 « 1.8 - 1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A75 / A55
Google Tensor G41.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 «  cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST2 cores
unknown cores
Clock1200 MHz1800 - 1800 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 28 / 8
Technology28 nm12 nm
FeaturesPowerVR SGX 540 (400 MHz), DDR2/DDR3 Memory ControllerARM Mali G52 MP2, Vivimagic 5.0 Tri-Core-ISP, LTE / 4G Modem, VDSP
iGPUPowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.com
CodenameCortex-A75 / A55

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Tangula T700
0.5 pt (37%)
Mediatek MT8766B
0.1631 -66%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
0.4641 -3%
UNISOC T610
0.4653 -3%
Mediatek Helio G70
0.4685 -3%
Mediatek Helio G85
0.4725 -2%
HiSilicon Kirin 710A
0.4737 -1%
Samsung Exynos 9611
0.4743 -1%
UNISOC T618
0.475 -1%
Mediatek Helio G80
0.4793 0%
HiSilicon Kirin 710
0.4795 0%
UNISOC Tangula T700
0.4809
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
0.4813 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
0.4915 2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
0.516 7%
Mediatek Helio P70
0.517 8%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
0.53 10%
Mediatek Helio P90
0.546 14%
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
0.552 15%
Mediatek Helio G90T
0.571 19%
MediaTek Dimensity 720
0.575 20%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G
1.3 170%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2815     avg: 2888     median: 2888 (34%)     max: 2961 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2844     avg: 2903     median: 2902.5 (33%)     max: 2961 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 347     avg: 351.5     median: 351.5 (14%)     max: 356 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1291     avg: 1342     median: 1342 (2%)     max: 1393 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3722 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10382 Points (9%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
65 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
44936 Points (38%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
37643 Points (30%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
36709 Points (7%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
67597 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
186885 Points (18%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
164867 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
65438 Points (18%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
2078 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
10033 Points (16%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 8743     avg: 8745     median: 8744.5 (36%)     max: 8746 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5412 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
12328 Points (26%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
8438 Points (55%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 4     median: 4 (2%)     max: 8.02 Watt

Average Benchmarks UNISOC Tangula T700 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 16. 21:29:44

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4129 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13247 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 13222 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731788984s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.002s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.002s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4129 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 4129 +0s ... 0.003s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13247 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#11 got single benchmarks 13247 +0s ... 0.004s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 13222 +0s ... 0.005s

#13 got single benchmarks 13222 +0.003s ... 0.008s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.008s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.013s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.013s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)