Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz vs Samsung Exynos W920 vs HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz

► remove from comparison  RK3066

Der Rockchip RK3066 ist ein günstiger SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er bietet zwei ARM Cortex-A9 CPU Kerne mit NEON Erweiterungen, eine ARM Mali 400MP4 (Quad-Core mit 250 MHz getaktet) Grafikkarte und einen Video De- und Encoder. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt maximal 2 GB DDR1-3.

Weitere Features lt Wikipedia

  • VPU (Video Processing Unit) Multi-Media Processor supporting 1080p image and video decoding
  • HDMI 1.4 Interface
  • 2-channels TFT LCD Interface with 5 layers and 3D Display (1920×1080 Maximum Display Size)
  • USB 2.0 Interface
  • SD/MMC Interface

Samsung Exynos W920

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos W920

Der Samsung Exynos W920 ist ein Dual-Core ARM SoC für IoT (Internet of Things) Devices aus 2021. Er integriert zwei ARM Cortex-A55 Kerne mit 1,18 GHz und wird im modernen 5nm Prozess gefertigt. Er integriert eine ARM Mali-G68 MP2 GPU, ein LTE Cat.4 150Mbps Download / Cat.5 75 Mbps Upload Modem und Unterstützung für eMMC 16GB und LPDDR4 12 GB. Videos können mit Full HD und 30fps aufgenommen werden und in HEVC (H.265), H.264 und VP8 en- und dekodiert werden.

HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620

► remove from comparison

Coretex A9 Quad-Core - max 1.5 GHz, im Huawei Mediapad 10 FHD mit 1.2 GHz

ModelRockchip RK3066 1.5 GHzSamsung Exynos W920HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620
Series Samsung
Serie:
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz « 1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Rockchip RK3566 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos W9301.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Samsung Exynos W920 « 1.18 GHz2 / 2 cores ARM Cortex-A55
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 « 1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Clock1500 MHz1180 MHz1200 MHz
L2 Cache512 KB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 24 / 4
Technology40 nm5 nm40 nm
FeaturesMali-400 MP4, Single Channel DDR3 Memory ControllerMali-G68MP2, qHD 960x540 Display Support, LTE Cat.4 150Mbps DL / Cat.5 75Mbps UL, GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo), LPDDR4 (12Gb), FHD 30fps videoARMv7
iGPUARM Mali-400 MP4 (250 MHz)ARM Mali-G68 MP2
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.rock-chips.com
CodenameARM Cortex-A55

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 4687     avg: 4990     median: 5059 (4%)     max: 5161 Points
min: 3209     avg: 4477     median: 4894 (4%)     max: 5167 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 RK3066 +
4890 Points (4%)
min: 5354     avg: 5357     median: 5357 (4%)     max: 5360 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1094 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
327 Points (6%)
min: 439     avg: 489.9     median: 500 (4%)     max: 547 Points
min: 940     avg: 1187     median: 1218 (11%)     max: 1290 Points
min: 1793     avg: 2360     median: 2351 (5%)     max: 2731 Points
min: 1000     avg: 1317     median: 1275 (3%)     max: 1591 Points
min: 1209     avg: 1573     median: 1557 (4%)     max: 1819 Points
min: 92.3     avg: 133.3     median: 138.1 (5%)     max: 151.8 MFLOPS
min: 37.8     avg: 44.2     median: 46.6 (5%)     max: 48.71 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 18706.2     avg: 19377     median: 19376.6 (23%)     max: 20047 ms
26477 ms (31%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
1959 ms (21%)
min: 2730     avg: 2861     median: 2804 (31%)     max: 3048.2 ms
min: 856     avg: 2197     median: 1610 (18%)     max: 4026 ms
min: 1522     avg: 1643     median: 1540 (15%)     max: 2080 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1990     avg: 2060     median: 2023 (2%)     max: 2166 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 RK3066 +
min: 3105     avg: 3862     median: 3974 (9%)     max: 4257 points
min: 4404     avg: 4736     median: 4736 (11%)     max: 5068 points
min: 4820     avg: 5667     median: 5662 (37%)     max: 6713 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
14434 Points (34%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 92     avg: 191     median: 191 (6%)     max: 290 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 8740     avg: 8897     median: 8897 (29%)     max: 9054 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 RK3066 +
5852 Points (1%)
min: 8223     avg: 8737     median: 8678 (1%)     max: 9118 Points

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos W920 → 70% n=1

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 → 122% n=1

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 06. 00:27:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3576 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13823 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3613 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728167273s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2024 05:16:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3576 +0s ... 0.003s

#9 got single benchmarks 3576 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13823 +0s ... 0.004s

#11 got single benchmarks 13823 +0s ... 0.005s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3613 +0s ... 0.005s

#13 got single benchmarks 3613 +0.002s ... 0.007s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.007s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.017s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.017s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)