Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz vs Rockchip RK3566 vs DK3.5+ST

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

Rockchip RK3566

► remove from comparison  RK3566

Der Rockchip RK3566 ist ein 2020 vorgestelltes ARM-SoC (System-on-a-Chip) der Einsteigerklasse, welches vorrangig in AIot-Geräten und E-Ink-Tablets eingesetzt wird, beispielsweise im Lenovo Paper Smart. Der Chip wird im 22-nm-Verfahren gefertigt und verfügt über vier Cortex-A55-Kerne. Die Grafikeinheit ist eine ARM Mali-G52 MP2. Weiterhin integriert ist unter anderem ein Videodecoder mit H.264 und H.265-Unterstützung.

Neben CPU und Grafikchip integriert der Chip auch einen LPDDR3/LPDDR4x-Speichercontroller, aber kein Mobilfunkmodem. Das SoC beinhaltet ein Modem für Wi-Fi 5 (a/b/g/n/ac). Weiters ist eine AI-Unit mit 1 TOPS verbaut.

ModelRockchip RK2918 1.2 GHzRockchip RK3566DK3.5+ST
Series Huawei
Serie:
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+STcores
unknown cores
Rockchip RK3566 « - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores ARM Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos W9301.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Samsung Exynos W9201.18 GHz2 / 2 cores ARM Cortex-A55
AMD Ryzen 7 8700G cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W10001.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T3101.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK32881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S52 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi36201.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK31681.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR86700.08 GHzcores
ARM Cortex-M4 cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 cores
DK3.5+ST « cores
unknown cores
Clock1200 MHz <=2000 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 14 / 42
Technology55 nm22 nm
FeaturesVivante GC800, DDR1-3 memory controller, hardware video en- and decoder
iGPUVivante GC800ARM Mali-G52 MP2
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameARM Cortex-A55
Manufacturerwww.96rocks.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
100%
1 RK3566 +
1061 Points (13%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
100%
1 RK3566 +
203 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3566 +
493 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3566 +
143 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3566 +
312 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 RK3566 +
745 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 RK3566 +
1418 Points (2%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
14.3 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 RK3566 +
34733 ms (41%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 RK3566 +
5022 Points (4%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 RK3566 +
21 Points (6%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
100%
1 RK3566 +
36 Points (8%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1249 points (3%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
100%
1 RK3566 +
105826 Points (6%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
100%
1 RK3566 +
29585 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 RK3566 +
4045 Points (19%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 RK3566 +
172 Points (7%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 RK3566 +
5.8 Watt (3%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 RK3566 +
1.8 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK3566 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 06. 00:31:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3317 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15076 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 12765 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1728167490s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 04 Oct 2024 05:16:25 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.028s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 3317 +0.001s ... 0.028s

#9 got single benchmarks 3317 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15076 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#11 got single benchmarks 15076 +0.003s ... 0.036s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0s ... 0.036s

#13 got single benchmarks 12765 +0s ... 0.036s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.044s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.044s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)