Notebookcheck Logo

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz vs MediaTek MTK 8113T

Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz

► remove from comparison

MediaTek MTK 8113T

Der MediaTek MTK 8113T ist ein einfaches SoC für E-Ink-Tablets und E-Reader. Er arbeitet sehr stromsparend, unterstützt aber weder Mobilfunk noch Kamerafunktionen.

Das SoC besitzt zwei ARM-Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2 GHz Takt. Als Arbeitsspeicher wird LPDDR4 unterstützt. WiFi 5 und Bluetooth 5.0 sind ebenfalls an Bord.

Der Chip wird im 12-nm-Verfahren gefertigt.

show full text
ModelRockchip RK2918 1.2 GHzMediaTek MTK 8113T
Series Mediatek
Serie: Cortex-A53
Google Tensor G4 compare1.95 GHz8 / 8 cores
HiSilicon Kirin 9000W compare1.53 - 2.49 GHz12 / 12 cores
Samsung Exynos W1000 compare1.5 GHz5 / 5 cores
UNISOC Tiger T310 compare1.8 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3288 compare1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores
Apple S5 compare2 / 2 cores
HiSilicon k3v2 Hi3620 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Rockchip RK3066 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Amlogic AML8726-MX compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK3168 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
ARM Cortex A8 1.2 GHz compare1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Telechips TCC8803 1GHz compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores
Loongson 2F 900MHz compare0.9 GHz1 / 1 cores
CSR8670 compare0.08 GHz2 cores
ARM Cortex-M4 compare cores
HiSilicon Hi6262 compare cores
DK3.5+ST compare2 cores
unknown compare cores
JLQ JR510 compare1.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 935 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 659 compare2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 658 compare2.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 655 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 650 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 930 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 620 compare1.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA1908 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113T « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113L compare1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A53
Clock1200 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads1 / 12 / 2
2 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Technology55 nm12 nm
FeaturesVivante GC800, DDR1-3 memory controller, hardware video en- and decoder
iGPUVivante GC800
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-A53

Benchmarks

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
14.3 MFLOPS (1%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 16154.2     avg: 16194     median: 16193.8 (19%)     max: 16233.3 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1633     avg: 1694     median: 1694 (1%)     max: 1755 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
1249 points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Rockchip RK2918 1.2 GHz → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MTK 8113T → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 15. 03:23:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3317 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18028 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731637385s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.027s ... 0.027s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.027s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 3317 +0.001s ... 0.028s

#8 got single benchmarks 3317 +0.003s ... 0.031s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18028 +0.001s ... 0.031s

#10 got single benchmarks 18028 +0.001s ... 0.032s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.034s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.036s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)