AMD Ryzen 9 7900 vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

► remove from comparison

Der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 ist ein High-End-Desktop-Prozessor der Raphael Serie mit 12-Kernen und Hyperthreading (SMT), womit dieser in Summe bis zu 24 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeiten kann. Mit der Vorstellung Anfang 2023 ist der Ryzen 9 7900 der schnellste 12-Kern-Prozessor mit 65 Watt TDP.

Der Ryzen 9 7900 taktet mit 3,7 GHz Basistakt und erreicht im Turbo bis zu 5,4 GHz auf einem Kern. Dies ist auch der Unterschied zum höher getaktetem Ryzen 9 7900X.

Der interne Aufbau des Prozessors hat sich auf den ersten Blick nicht grundlegend verändert. Der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 basiert weiterhin auf dem Chiplet-Design bestehend aus zwei CCD-Clustern, welche jeweils einen CCX mit 8-Kernen beinhalten. Mit 5 nm wurde allerdings der Fertigungsprozess verkleinert, wodurch die höheren Taktraten zu gewährleisten sind. Weiterhin gibt es den IO-Die, der unter anderem den Speichercontroller sowie die iGPU beinhaltet. Dieser wird nunmehr in 6 nm Strukturbreite gefertigt.

In Spielen kann der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 dank der deutlich verbesserten IPC überzeugen.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten:

Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
Hardware Security Engine

Model

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

Series

AMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)

Codename

Raphael (Zen4)

Cortex-A9

Serie: Cortex-A9

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D	4.2 - 5.7 GHz	16 / 32	128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X	4.7 - 5.6 GHz	12 / 24	64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 «	3.7 - 5.4 GHz	12 / 24	64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X	4.5 - 5.4 GHz	8 / 16	32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700	3.8 - 5.3 GHz	8 / 16	32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D	4.2 - 5 GHz	8 / 16	96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X	4.7 - 5.3 GHz	6 / 12	32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600	3.8 - 5.1 GHz	6 / 12	32 MB L3

HiSilicon Kirin 910T	1.8 GHz	4 / 4	Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK3188	1.8 GHz	4 / 4	Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910	1.6 GHz	4 / 4	Cortex-A9
Renesas MP5232	1.5 GHz	2 / 2	Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T	1.2 GHz	2 / 2	Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986	1.2 GHz	2 / 2	Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL	1 GHz	1 / 1	Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 «	1 GHz	1 / 1	Cortex-A9

Clock

3700 - 5400 MHz

1000 MHz

L1 Cache

768 KB

L2 Cache

12 MB

L3 Cache

64 MB

Cores / Threads

12 / 24

1 / 1

TDP

65 Watt

Transistors

9.9 Million

Technology

5 nm

Voltage

0.650 - 1.475V V

Die Size

262 mm²

max. Temp.

95 °C

Socket

AM5 (LGA 1718)

Features

MMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2

iGPU

AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) ( - 2200 MHz)

ARM Mali-400 MP

Architecture

x86

ARM

Announced

Manufacturer

www.wondermedia.com.tw

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900

46.1 pt (77%)

2.31 -95%

...

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

44.3 -4%

Intel Core i7-14700HX

44.3 -4%

Intel Core i9-13900HX

45 -2%

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

45 -2%

AMD Ryzen 7 7700X

45.1 -2%

Intel Core i9-13950HX

45.2 -2%

Intel Core i9-13980HX

46.1 0%

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

46.1 0%

Intel Core i7-13700K

46.1 0%

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

46.1

Intel Core i9-14900HX

46.8 2%

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

47.1 2%

Intel Core i9-14900

47.2 2%

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

47.3 3%

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

47.4 3%

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

47.5 3%

Intel Core i7-14700K

47.6 3%

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

48.1 4%

Intel Core i9-13900K

49 6%

...

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX

60.1 30%

0%

100%

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core

100%

24776 Points (23%)

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core

100%

1966 Points (84%)

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

100%

762 Points (84%)

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

100%

9703 Points (24%)

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

100%

4020 Points (25%)

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit

100%

315 Points (88%)

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit

100%

45.3 Points (59%)

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit

100%

3.7 Points (87%)

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)

100%

8339 Points (50%)

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)

100%

60934 Points (44%)

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *

100%

46.8 s (1%)

wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *

100%

3 s (1%)

WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0

100%

10154 Points (16%)

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs

100%

112881 MIPS (65%)

7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs

100%

7936 MIPS (94%)

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2

100%

207 fps (69%)

X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1

100%

355.5 fps (82%)

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset

100%

31.2 fps (55%)

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent

100%

2 GB/s (59%)

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish

100%

3.1 GB/s (53%)

TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES

100%

21.5 GB/s (56%)

Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *

100%

199 Seconds (3%)

Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *

100%

125 Seconds (1%)

R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *

100%

0.4 sec (8%)

3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU

100%

19451 Points (41%)

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *

100%

6.7 s (1%)

Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *

100%

13.9 s (1%)

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *

100%

329 s (1%)

3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics

100%

26325 Points (66%)

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU

100%

14817 Points (62%)

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

2203 Points (86%)

Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

17880 Points (32%)

Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

2096 Points (9%)

Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

17581 Points (55%)

Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core

100%

8861 Points (88%)

Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core

100%

65241 Points (65%)

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread

100%

30.8 MFLOPS (1%)

Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread

100%

37.5 MFLOPS (4%)

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *

100%

452 ms (1%)

Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *

100%

2410 ms (23%)

WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score

100%

302 Points (85%)

WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score

100%

366 Points (67%)

Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score

100%

2140 points (5%)

AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU

100%

1282 Points (8%)

CrossMark - CrossMark Overall

100%

2322 Points (89%)

Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *

100%

203 Watt (35%)

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *

100%

196.9 Watt (36%)

Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *

100%

106.9 Watt (71%)

Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor

100%

20.4 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900 → 0% ⁿ⁼⁰

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 0% ⁿ⁼⁰

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte

- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
¹ This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023

v1.28

log 17. 11:33:00

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15014 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731839580s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.03s ... 0.03s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15014 +0.005s ... 0.034s

#8 got single benchmarks 15014 +0.004s ... 0.038s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.039s

#10 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.042s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.061s

#13 return log +0.038s ... 0.099s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!

> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head

Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)