Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7900 vs Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7900

Der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 ist ein High-End-Desktop-Prozessor der Raphael Serie mit 12-Kernen und Hyperthreading (SMT), womit dieser in Summe bis zu 24 Threads gleichzeitig verarbeiten kann. Mit der Vorstellung Anfang 2023 ist der Ryzen 9 7900 der schnellste 12-Kern-Prozessor mit 65 Watt TDP. 

Der Ryzen 9 7900 taktet mit 3,7 GHz Basistakt und erreicht im Turbo bis zu 5,4 GHz auf einem Kern. Dies ist auch der Unterschied zum höher getaktetem Ryzen 9 7900X.

Der interne Aufbau des Prozessors hat sich auf den ersten Blick nicht grundlegend verändert. Der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 basiert weiterhin auf dem Chiplet-Design bestehend aus zwei CCD-Clustern, welche jeweils einen CCX mit 8-Kernen beinhalten. Mit 5 nm wurde allerdings der Fertigungsprozess verkleinert, wodurch die höheren Taktraten zu gewährleisten sind. Weiterhin gibt es den IO-Die, der unter anderem den Speichercontroller sowie die iGPU beinhaltet. Dieser wird nunmehr in 6 nm Strukturbreite gefertigt.

In Spielen kann der AMD Ryzen 9 7900 dank der deutlich verbesserten IPC überzeugen. 

Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T

► remove from comparison  Helio P22T MT8768T

Der MediaTek Helio P22T MT8768T ist ein günstiges SoC für Android-Smartphones und -Tablets der Einsteiger-Klasse. Das Prozessor besitzt 8 Prozessorkerne unterteilt in zwei Cluster: 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 2,3 GHz und 4 Cortex-A53-Kerne mit bis zu 1,8 GHz. Im Vergleich zum langsameren MT8768 taktet die CPU Kerne höher.

Als Grafikchip kommt ein IMG PowerVR GE8320 zum Einsatz (650 MHz), der Speichercontroller unterstützt LPDDR4x. Der integrierte Videoencoder unterstützt nur H.264 mit maximal 1080p30, der Decoder auch H.265 ebenfalls mit 1080p30.

Das integrierte LTE-Modem unterstützt 4G (Cat-7 Download, Cat-13 Upload). Bluetooth 5.0 und die WLAN-Standards bis Wi-Fi 5 werden unterstützt.

Das SoC wird wahrscheinlich wie der MT8768 im 12nm-FinFET-Herstellungsverfahren produziert.

ModelAMD Ryzen 9 7900Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T
CodenameRaphael (Zen4)Cortex-A53
SeriesAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Mediatek
Serie: Mediatek Cortex-A53
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 « 3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T « 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750T compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8165 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Clock3700 - 5400 MHz2300 MHz
L1 Cache768 KB
L2 Cache12 MB
L3 Cache64 MB
Cores / Threads12 / 248 / 8
TDP65 Watt
Transistors9.9 Million
Technology5 nm16 nm
Voltage0.650 - 1.475V V
Die Size262 mm2
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketAM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2PowerVR GE8320, Dual-Channel LPDDR4X
iGPUAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) ( - 2200 MHz)PowerVR GE8320 (650 MHz)
Architecturex86ARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900
46.1 pt (77%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Helio P22T MT8768T
0.3 pt (26%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
24776 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
1966 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 R9 7900 +
762 Points (84%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 R9 7900 +
9703 Points (24%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R9 7900 +
4020 Points (25%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R9 7900 +
315 Points (88%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 R9 7900 +
45.3 Points (59%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 R9 7900 +
3.7 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 R9 7900 +
8339 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 R9 7900 +
60934 Points (44%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
46.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 R9 7900 +
10154 Points (16%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 R9 7900 +
112881 MIPS (65%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 R9 7900 +
7936 MIPS (94%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 R9 7900 +
207 fps (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 R9 7900 +
355.5 fps (82%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 R9 7900 +
31.2 fps (55%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 R9 7900 +
2 GB/s (59%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 R9 7900 +
3.1 GB/s (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 R9 7900 +
21.5 GB/s (56%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
199 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
125 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 R9 7900 +
19451 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
329 s (1%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 R9 7900 +
26325 Points (66%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 R9 7900 +
14817 Points (62%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 443     avg: 869     median: 869 (10%)     max: 1295 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
806 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2203 Points (86%)
min: 160     avg: 166     median: 166 (6%)     max: 172 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
17880 Points (32%)
min: 920     avg: 936     median: 936 (2%)     max: 952 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2096 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17581 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8861 Points (88%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
65241 Points (65%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
813 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3775 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
452 ms (1%)
12972 ms (15%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 5004     avg: 5080     median: 5080 (4%)     max: 5156 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
100%
1 R9 7900 +
302 Points (85%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
366 Points (67%)
35 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
105754 Points (10%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
117837 Points (6%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
38139 Points (10%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
5163 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
7724 Points (3%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 5120     avg: 5171     median: 5170.5 (19%)     max: 5221 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
4895 Points (32%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
100%
1 R9 7900 +
2322 Points (89%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
203 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
196.9 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.1 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
100%
1 R9 7900 +
106.9 Watt (71%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
100%
1 R9 7900 +
20.4 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T → 7% n=8

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 25. 05:22:38

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15014 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13527 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732508558s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 25 Nov 2024 05:17:40 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15014 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 15014 +0s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13527 +0.003s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 13527 +0s ... 0.01s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.01s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.023s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.023s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.023s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.023s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.027s

#17 return log +0.001s ... 0.028s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)