Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U vs Intel Celeron N5095A

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U

AMD R7 PRO 7730U

Der AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U ist ein Mobilprozessor für kleine und leichte Notebooks basierend auf die Cezanne Serie. Er ist Teil des zweiten Barcelo-Refresh Anfang 2023. Der SoC beinhaltet acht Zen 3 Kerne (Octa-Core CPU) welche von 2 bis zu 4,5 GHz getaktet werden (Turbo) und SMT / Hyperthreading (16 Threads) unterstützen. Der Chip wird in 7nm bei TSMC gefertigt. Die CPU ist identisch zum älteren Ryzen 7 5825U aus 2022 bzw auch zum Ryzen 7 7730U, jedoch mit Unterstützung der AMD PRO Technologien

Die Leistung ist identisch zum älteren Ryzen 7 5825U und damit hinter dem Ryzen 7 6800U mit bis zu 4,7 GHz und deutlich schnellerer iGPU.

Der SoC integriert neben den acht Prozessorkernen noch eine Radeon RX Vega 8 Grafikkarte mit 8 CUs und bis zu 2000 MHz Takt (bzw. 1900 MHz im Geekbench Leak), einen Dual-Channel DDR4 Speicherkontroller (DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266) und 16 MB Level 3 Cache. 

Der TDP ist mit 15 Watt spezifiziert, wodurch sich die APU auch für leichte Notebooks eignet.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelAMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730UIntel Celeron N5095A
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Jasper Lake
CodenameBarcelo-U RefreshJasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U « 2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U compare2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7530U compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 4500 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache16 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology7 nm10 nm
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketFP6BGA1338
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 PRO 7730U
34.2 pt (57%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
82.8 Points (47%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
357 Points (7%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10095 Points (9%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1441 Points (61%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
562 Points (62%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3967 Points (10%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1756 Points (11%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
229 Points (64%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
17.6 Points (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.7 Points (64%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6108 Points (37%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
33735 Points (24%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
369.1 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
10.4 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5274 Points (8%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 42735     avg: 45924     median: 45924 (26%)     max: 49113 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5218     avg: 5269     median: 5269 (62%)     max: 5320 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
95 fps (32%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
221 fps (51%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.5     avg: 12.1     median: 12.1 (21%)     max: 12.6 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (14%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.7 GB/s (12%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
4.2 GB/s (11%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 523     avg: 528     median: 528 (7%)     max: 533 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 298     avg: 301.5     median: 301.5 (2%)     max: 305 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.543     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (12%)     max: 0.553 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
8758 Points (19%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.5 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
18 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
456.7 s (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7418     avg: 10822     median: 10821.5 (27%)     max: 14225 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 12097     avg: 14052     median: 14052 (36%)     max: 16007 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 20193     avg: 20887     median: 20887 (37%)     max: 21581 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4961     avg: 5989     median: 5988.5 (25%)     max: 7016 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
min: 1889     avg: 1895     median: 1894.5 (48%)     max: 1900 Points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
min: 5685     avg: 6336     median: 6336 (25%)     max: 6987 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1416     avg: 1438     median: 1437.5 (56%)     max: 1459 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5972     avg: 6560     median: 6559.5 (12%)     max: 7147 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
648 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
71022 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
254 Points (47%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1207 Points (46%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
44.2 Watt (8%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
7.1 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
9.1 Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 14. 20:29:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 16350 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731612570s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 16350 +0.004s ... 0.012s

#8 got single benchmarks 16350 +0.005s ... 0.017s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.018s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.038s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.04s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)