Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U vs Intel Core i5-7500T

AMD Ryzen 7 5825U

► remove from comparison AMD R7 5825U

Der AMD Ryzen 7 5825U ist ein Mobilprozessor für kleine und leichte Notebooks basierend auf die Cezanne Serie. Er ist Teil des Barcelo-Refresh Anfang 2022. Der SoC beinhaltet acht Zen 3 Kerne (Octa-Core CPU) welche von 2 bis zu 4,5 GHz getaktet werden (Turbo) und SMT / Hyperthreading (16 Threads) unterstützen. Der Chip wird im modernen 7nm Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt. Im Vergleich zum Ryzen 7 5800U, bietet der 5825U um 100 MHz höhere Taktraten der CPU-Kerne.

Die Leistung sollte nur minimal oberhalb des Ryzen 7 5800U liegen und hinter dem neuen Ryzen 7 6800U mit bis zu 4,7 GHz und deutlich schnellerer iGPU.

Der SoC integriert neben den acht Prozessorkernen noch eine Radeon RX Vega 8 Grafikkarte mit 8 CUs und bis zu 2000 MHz Takt (bzw. 1900 MHz im Geekbench Leak), einen Dual-Channel DDR4 Speicherkontroller (DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-4266) und 16 MB Level 3 Cache. 

Der TDP ist weiterhin von 10 - 25 Watt konfigurierbar (15 Watt Default, in den meisten Notebooks aber 25 Watt). Daher ist der Chip auch für kleine und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

Intel Core i5-7500T

► remove from comparison Intel i5-7500T

Der Intel Core i5-7600K ist ein sparsamer Desktop Quad-Core Prozessor auf Basis der Kaby-Lake-Architektur, der im Anfang 2017 vorgestellt wurde. Die in einem verbesserten 14-Nanometer-Prozess gefertigte CPU taktet mit 2,7 bis 3,3 GHz, bietet jedoch kein Hyper-Threading (daher nur 4 Threads). 

Für Grafikberechnungen zeigt sich die im Prozessor integrierte Intel HD Graphics 630 mit 24 EUs (Execution Units) verantwortlich, die mit 350 - 1100 MHz taktet. 

Der TDP ist sogar geringer als bei den Mobilprozessoren (45 Watt der HQ Serie) auf nur 35 Watt spezifiziert, wodurch die Desktop CPU auch in Laptops zur Anwendung kommt.

show full text
ModelAMD Ryzen 7 5825UIntel Core i5-7500T
CodenameBarcelo-U (Zen 3)Kaby Lake
SeriesAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)Intel Kaby Lake
Serie: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U « 2 - 4.5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U compare2.3 - 4.3 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 5425U compare2.7 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T « 2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2000 - 4500 MHz2700 - 3300 MHz
L1 Cache512 KB256 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1 MB
L3 Cache16 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 164 / 4
TDP15 Watt35 Watt
Technology7 nm14 nm
max. Temp.95 °C
SocketFP6FCLGA1151
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2400 Memory Controller, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 630 (350 - 1100 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
$202 U.S.

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 5825U
34.4 pt (57%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -93%
...
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
33.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
33.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
33.9 -1%
Intel Core i7-11375H
34 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7730U
34.2 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735U
34.2 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
34.3 0%
Intel Core i7-11390H
34.3 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U
34.3 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 5825U
34.4
AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
34.5 0%
AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
34.5 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U
34.5 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
34.5 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 165U
34.6 1%
Intel Core i7-1270P
34.6 1%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
34.6 1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 155U
34.7 1%
Intel Core i5-12450H
34.7 1%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 38%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 75%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 9339     avg: 10198     median: 10273.5 (10%)     max: 10904 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1433     avg: 1447     median: 1447 (61%)     max: 1460 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 547     avg: 557     median: 556 (62%)     max: 567 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3645     avg: 3958     median: 4003.5 (10%)     max: 4180 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1575     avg: 1748     median: 1778 (11%)     max: 1860 Points
512 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 228     avg: 230.8     median: 231.5 (65%)     max: 232 Points
129 Points (36%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
18.6 Points (24%)
5.9 Points (8%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.8 Points (65%)
1.5 Points (35%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
6304 Points (38%)
5002 Points (30%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
32641 Points (24%)
13614 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
60163 Points (38%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
11845 Points (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
340.8 s (4%)
333.2 s (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
9.2 s (2%)
10.5 s (2%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
5835 Points (9%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 42883     avg: 46893     median: 47588.5 (27%)     max: 49511 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5208     avg: 5387     median: 5436.5 (64%)     max: 5468 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100.3 fps (34%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
249.6 fps (58%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.1     avg: 12.5     median: 12.7 (22%)     max: 13.4 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
0.3 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.5 GB/s (26%)
0.4 GB/s (8%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
8.7 GB/s (23%)
2.7 GB/s (7%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 486     avg: 535     median: 542.5 (7%)     max: 567 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 281     avg: 302     median: 302.5 (2%)     max: 322 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.515     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.536 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
11292 Points (24%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.2 s (2%)
12 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
15.7 s (1%)
26.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
366 s (2%)
629 s (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 10473     avg: 12263     median: 12484 (32%)     max: 13611 Points
6740 Points (17%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
33605 Points (27%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
50218 Points (41%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
51843 Points (43%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13778     avg: 15058     median: 15103.5 (38%)     max: 16247 Points
4748 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19642     avg: 21046     median: 20905 (37%)     max: 22730 Points
6773 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5841     avg: 6386     median: 6440 (27%)     max: 6823 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1438     avg: 1467     median: 1468 (57%)     max: 1496 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5827     avg: 6659     median: 6782 (12%)     max: 7367 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1455 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7235 Points (23%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 621     avg: 630     median: 627.5 (1%)     max: 645 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
83.2 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
70779 Points (59%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 207     avg: 218.8     median: 213 (60%)     max: 242 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 239     avg: 261.8     median: 266.5 (49%)     max: 275 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1124     avg: 1269     median: 1311 (50%)     max: 1330 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 34.6     avg: 45     median: 45.6 (8%)     max: 54.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 37.3     avg: 46     median: 46.6 (9%)     max: 54 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 2.81     avg: 3.3     median: 3.2 (2%)     max: 3.77 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 4.11     avg: 5.1     median: 4.8 (5%)     max: 6.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 34.4     avg: 36.5     median: 36.5 (27%)     max: 38.6 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 5825U → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-7500T → 51% n=17

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 27. 06:34:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14092 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9320 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735277697s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14092 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#8 got single benchmarks 14092 +0.008s ... 0.016s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9320 +0s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 9320 +0s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.026s ... 0.043s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.044s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)