AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Intel Core i9-12900HK vs Intel Core i9-12900H
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS ► remove from comparison
Der AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS ist ein Mobilprozessor für große Notebooks (z.B. Gaming-Laptops) basierend auf die Renoir Generation. Der SoC beinhaltet acht Zen 2 Kerne (Octa-Core CPU) welche mit bis zu 4,2 GHz getaktet werden (Turbo) und SMT / Hyperthreading (16 Threads) unterstützen. Der Chip wird im modernen 7nm Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt und soll laut AMD eine 2x verbesserte Performance pro Watt bieten als die Ryzen 3000 APUs (z.B. den Ryzen 7 3750H Vorgänger).
Laut AMD ist der Ryzen 7 4800H (und damit der HS in etwa) um 5% schneller als ein Intel Core i7-9750H im Einzelkernbenchmark des Cinebench R20 und 46% schneller im Multikernbenchmark. Damit würde sich die CPU zwischen dem Intel Core i9-9880H und 9980HK an der Spitze von mobilen Prozessoren einordnen. Damit eignet sie sich auch für anspruchsvolle Anforderungen sehr gut. Laut Asus (die den Chip exklusiv für die ersten Monate einsetzen), ist die Performance vergleichbar mit dem Ryzen 7 4800H.
Der SoC integriert neben den acht Prozessorkernen noch eine Radeon RX Vega 7 Grafikkarte mit 7 CUs und bis zu 1600 MHz Takt, einen Dual-Channel DDR4-3200 / LPDDR4-4266 Speicherkontroller und 8 MB Level 3 Cache. Detaillierte Informationen zu den Renoir APUs finden Sie hier auf unserer Architekturseite .
Im Vergleich zum Ryzen 7 4800H , bietet der 4800HS einen um 10 Watt geringeren TDP (35 versus 45 W) bei sonst gleichen Spezifikationen. Daher ist der Chip für große und schwere Notebooks vorgesehen und benötigt, trotz des effizienten 7nm Herstellungsprozesses, eine gute Kühlung um die Leistung auch dauerhaft zu erbringen.
Intel Core i9-12900HK ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Die K-Variante bezeichnet den freien Multiplikator, wodurch sich die CPU übertakten lässt. Im Unterschied zum 12900H, bietet der 12900HK nur die "Essentials"-Features von vPro.
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900HK in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine durchschnittlich 13% höhere Performance an und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo). In unseren Tests ist die Performance stark abhängig von den TDP Settings und der Kühlung und kann sich im Schnitt etwas vom Ryzen 9 6900HX absetzen (+11% zur Zeit des Schreibens, siehe Vergleich ).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900HK sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 115 Watt). Die meisten Notebooks werden aber einen PL1 von etwa 60 Watt erlauben. Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900HK im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).
Intel Core i9-12900H ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900H ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Im Vergleich zum 12900HK bietet der 12900H keinen freien Multiplikator, aber unterstützt das volle "Enterprise" Feature-Set von vPro (Management Features).
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900H in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine 13% höhere Performance an (1080p high) und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900H sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900H ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (115W PL2). Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900H im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm).
Model AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS Intel Core i9-12900HK Intel Core i9-12900H Series AMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU) Intel Alder Lake-P Intel Alder Lake-P Codename Renoir-HS (Zen 2) Alder Lake-H Alder Lake-H Serie: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H Clock 2900 - 4200 MHz 1800 - 5000 MHz 1800 - 5000 MHz L1 Cache 512 KB 1.2 MB 1.2 MB L2 Cache 4 MB 11.5 MB 11.5 MB L3 Cache 8 MB 24 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 8 / 16 14 / 20 14 / 20 TDP 35 Watt 45 Watt 45 Watt Technology 7 nm 10 nm 10 nm max. Temp. 105 °C 100 °C 100 °C Socket FP6 BGA1744 BGA1744 Features DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-4266 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Dir., DL Boost, GNA, RPE, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA iGPU AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1600 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer www.amd.com ark.intel.com ark.intel.com
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R7 4800HS
31 pt (52%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
39.4 pt (66%)
...
...
max:
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900H
39.2 pt (65%)
...
...
max:
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 105 avg: 109.5 median: 109.5 (62%) max: 114 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 92% 100%
min: 96 avg: 104.9 median: 106 (60%) max: 112 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W 90% 96% 99% 100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 746 avg: 811 median: 811 (15%) max: 876 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 100% 85%
min: 371 avg: 636 median: 578 (11%) max: 920 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W 64% 63% 80% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13410 avg: 17662 median: 18373 (17%) max: 19282 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 82% 71% 96% 97% 100% 100%
min: 7359 avg: 15133 median: 15946.5 (15%) max: 19648 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 68% 67% 56% 78% 78% 83% 71% 81% 84% 85% 92% 81% 100% 95% 87% 96% 96% 92% 84%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1586 avg: 1797 median: 1901 (81%) max: 1940 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 97% 82% 100% 98% 86% 98%
min: 1634 avg: 1829 median: 1863.5 (79%) max: 1930 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 84% 92% 94% 96% 99% 99% 91% 98% 99% 89% 100% 96% 88% 98% 99% 86% 98% 96% 97%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
482 Points (53%)
min: 596 avg: 679 median: 685 (76%) max: 739 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 79% 99% 83% 93% 100% 81% 99%
min: 624 avg: 706 median: 714.5 (79%) max: 738 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 85% 93% 95% 98% 100% 96% 91% 99% 100% 92% 93% 97% 98% 100% 100% 81% 99% 99% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3869 Points (9%)
min: 5168 avg: 6742 median: 7040 (17%) max: 7366 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 83% 72% 96% 95% 100% 100%
min: 2681 avg: 5717 median: 6056.5 (15%) max: 7471 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 68% 61% 57% 78% 73% 84% 71% 82% 86% 81% 93% 81% 100% 94% 87% 96% 96% 83% 91%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1634 avg: 1701 median: 1700.5 (11%) max: 1767 Points
min: 1975 avg: 2695 median: 2836 (18%) max: 2944 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 68% 84% 68% 95% 100% 98% 100%
min: 1395 avg: 2454 median: 2576.5 (16%) max: 3077 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 67% 76% 70% 79% 92% 80% 74% 80% 85% 87% 92% 85% 99% 96% 90% 94% 96% 100% 90%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 186 avg: 186.5 median: 186.5 (52%) max: 187 Points
min: 226 avg: 258.1 median: 270 (76%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 96% 81% 100% 99% 86% 97%
min: 235 avg: 262.3 median: 266 (75%) max: 277 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 83% 89% 90% 95% 99% 98% 89% 97% 99% 91% 100% 94% 97% 99% 98% 86% 97% 99% 99%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
19.9 Points (26%)
min: 23.44 avg: 27.9 median: 27.3 (35%) max: 33 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 60% 83% 71% 100%
min: 12.08 avg: 23.6 median: 25.3 (33%) max: 32.77 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 60% 64% 79% 99% 71% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (52%)
min: 2.69 avg: 3.1 median: 3.3 (77%) max: 3.28 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 67% 99% 82% 100%
min: 2.83 avg: 3 median: 3 (71%) max: 3.3 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 82% 91% 94% 100% 82% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
5705 Points (34%)
min: 7710 avg: 8840 median: 9397 (57%) max: 9412 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 61% 100% 82% 100%
min: 7952 avg: 8475 median: 8235 (50%) max: 9498 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 79% 84% 94% 100% 81% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
36313 Points (26%)
min: 48838 avg: 51988 median: 49924 (36%) max: 57202 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 63% 87% 85% 100%
min: 24313 avg: 43425 median: 47767 (35%) max: 60567 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 61% 59% 80% 100% 81% 94%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 75223 avg: 75585 median: 75585 (48%) max: 75947 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 99%
min: 48178 avg: 66910 median: 70976.5 (45%) max: 77409 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 83% 93% 98% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 12378 avg: 13841 median: 13840.5 (17%) max: 15303 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 81%
min: 12846 avg: 13385 median: 13227.5 (16%) max: 14567 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 91% 93% 100% 86%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
91.1 s (1%)
min: 186.394 avg: 193.7 median: 193.7 (2%) max: 201.062 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 101% 100% 100%
min: 187.176 avg: 206.8 median: 197.8 (2%) max: 265.116 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
4.1 s (1%)
min: 3.375 avg: 3.4 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 3.454 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100% 100%
min: 3.421 avg: 4.1 median: 4 (1%) max: 5.062 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
4642 Points (7%)
min: 7387 avg: 8565 median: 8735 (14%) max: 9573 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 48% 91% 77% 100%
min: 7620 avg: 8202 median: 7937 (13%) max: 9328 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 73% 83% 89% 97% 77% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
48392 MIPS (28%)
min: 55620 avg: 68839 median: 72836 (42%) max: 75564 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 79% 85% 77% 93% 99% 100% 94%
min: 34684 avg: 60849 median: 64908.5 (37%) max: 76677 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 74% 70% 64% 80% 87% 89% 78% 88% 91% 94% 93% 89% 89% 100% 89% 99% 93% 95% 95%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
4655 MIPS (55%)
min: 5257 avg: 5769 median: 5803 (68%) max: 6186 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 81% 98% 86% 100% 99% 85% 94%
min: 5302 avg: 5843 median: 5881 (69%) max: 6289 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 87% 89% 95% 96% 99% 93% 91% 90% 95% 94% 100% 100% 97% 100% 98% 85% 94% 96% 94%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
99 fps (33%)
min: 113.7 avg: 132.8 median: 125.1 (42%) max: 159.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 62% 78% 71% 100%
min: 67.5 avg: 105.8 median: 111.4 (37%) max: 126.7 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 61% 58% 79% 71% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
216.5 fps (50%)
min: 276 avg: 298 median: 300.4 (69%) max: 317.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 68% 100% 87% 95%
min: 225 avg: 266.6 median: 263.3 (61%) max: 317 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 77% 85% 100% 90% 98%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
12 fps (21%)
min: 15.7 avg: 19.4 median: 20.5 (36%) max: 21.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 81% 73% 85% 93% 96% 100%
min: 8.05 avg: 17.1 median: 17.8 (31%) max: 22.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 68% 61% 56% 77% 79% 82% 73% 86% 89% 88% 83% 87% 97% 93% 88% 94% 98% 100% 94%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.1 GB/s (32%)
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (38%) max: 1.5 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 73% 80% 87% 100%
min: 0.864 avg: 1.1 median: 1 (29%) max: 1.4 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 66% 73% 76% 93% 87% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
1.8 GB/s (31%)
min: 2.2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.3 (40%) max: 2.6 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 69% 85% 88% 100%
min: 1.5 avg: 1.8 median: 1.9 (33%) max: 2.1 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 67% 73% 81% 65% 88% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
10.3 GB/s (27%)
min: 13 avg: 14.5 median: 14.1 (37%) max: 16.3 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 63% 80% 87% 100%
min: 8.6 avg: 10.5 median: 10.3 (27%) max: 12.8 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 58% 69% 78% 60% 87% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
413 Seconds (5%)
min: 273 avg: 420.7 median: 376 (5%) max: 850 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 140 W 100% 102% 100% 102% 103% 103% 103% 103% 103% 104% 104% 103%
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
284 Seconds (2%)
min: 172.5 avg: 191.9 median: 181 (1%) max: 234 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101%
min: 160 avg: 231.3 median: 205.5 (1%) max: 451 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 100% 100% 100% 101% 101% 101% 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.6 sec (13%)
min: 0.4155 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4997 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 103% 102% 104% 104% 102% 104%
min: 0.4218 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (10%) max: 0.506 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 100% 101% 101% 102% 102% 102% 101% 102% 102% 102% 103% 102% 101% 102% 102% 101% 102% 102% 102%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
12785 Points (27%)
min: 13096 avg: 15289 median: 15597.5 (33%) max: 16864 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 76% 86% 78% 100% 99%
min: 10122 avg: 13153 median: 13453 (29%) max: 14655 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 71% 81% 84% 81% 100% 99%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
9.7 s (2%)
min: 7.281 avg: 7.7 median: 7.3 (2%) max: 8.438 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 101% 100% 101%
min: 7.3 avg: 7.7 median: 7.5 (2%) max: 8.329 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
22.3 s (1%)
min: 16.1 avg: 17.2 median: 16.5 (1%) max: 18.844 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 16.373 avg: 17.3 median: 17.2 (1%) max: 18.439 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
561 s (2%)
min: 383.9 avg: 405.7 median: 397.4 (2%) max: 435.936 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 101% 101% 101%
min: 385.4 avg: 410.8 median: 398.6 (2%) max: 474.148 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 59882 avg: 65775 median: 60056 (46%) max: 77386 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 78% 77% 100%
min: 33640 avg: 52620 median: 53621 (41%) max: 62706 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 60% 69% 78% 77% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
14924 Points (38%)
min: 17378 avg: 22097 median: 22297.5 (56%) max: 25556 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 71% 85% 70% 98% 94% 84% 100%
min: 10552 avg: 21276 median: 22264 (56%) max: 26126 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 74% 90% 69% 81% 100% 91% 79% 100% 94% 91% 96% 93% 88% 90% 82% 82% 98% 96% 96%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 66129 avg: 78262 median: 71995 (58%) max: 96663 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 100% 68% 74%
min: 70655 avg: 87893 median: 91477 (74%) max: 103016 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 80% 77% 92% 64% 70% 95% 100% 89%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 65657 avg: 78481 median: 72055 (58%) max: 97730 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 100% 67% 74%
min: 71651 avg: 89380 median: 91745 (74%) max: 103757 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 77% 84% 92% 63% 69% 93% 100% 88%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 75600 avg: 88980 median: 88770 (74%) max: 102779 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 100% 74% 92% 81%
min: 81857 avg: 89973 median: 89999 (75%) max: 100472 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 135 W 83% 89% 97% 81% 94% 91% 83% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
16062 Points (41%)
min: 16214 avg: 18700 median: 18585 (47%) max: 21231 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 89% 76% 92% 94% 83% 100%
min: 9262 avg: 17875 median: 18691.5 (47%) max: 22123 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 73% 76% 73% 87% 85% 81% 92% 97% 90% 92% 93% 99% 98% 81% 83% 100% 96% 90%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
21217 Points (38%)
min: 23308 avg: 27794 median: 28300 (50%) max: 31045 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 87% 75% 94% 100% 86% 97%
min: 9703 avg: 25492 median: 26678.5 (48%) max: 31176 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 74% 88% 71% 86% 95% 83% 80% 100% 92% 86% 93% 31% 98% 97% 85% 85% 97% 89% 92%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 8264 avg: 8441 median: 8440.5 (36%) max: 8617 Points
min: 9449 avg: 12247 median: 12430.5 (52%) max: 14252 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 67% 83% 66% 90% 98% 82% 100%
min: 5062 avg: 11544 median: 12039 (51%) max: 14424 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 67% 86% 67% 81% 100% 87% 73% 92% 94% 87% 89% 91% 88% 97% 83% 81% 99% 87% 92%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2611 Points (66%)
min: 1893 avg: 2375 median: 2464 (63%) max: 2652 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W 81% 94% 94% 100%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
10721 Points (42%)
min: 9258 avg: 10604 median: 10233 (40%) max: 12649 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W 76% 80% 90% 100%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1188 avg: 1191 median: 1190.5 (47%) max: 1193 Points
min: 1596 avg: 1793 median: 1868 (73%) max: 1918 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 75% 97% 97% 100% 83% 98%
min: 1631 avg: 1800 median: 1820 (71%) max: 1897 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 84% 95% 94% 96% 100% 100% 93% 98% 96% 96% 99% 97% 91% 100% 98% 84% 99% 97% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7540 avg: 7611 median: 7611 (14%) max: 7682 Points
min: 10378 avg: 13176 median: 13682.5 (25%) max: 14294 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 70% 87% 100% 98% 91% 99%
min: 8519 avg: 11913 median: 12237 (22%) max: 14376 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 72% 87% 70% 83% 98% 87% 84% 92% 90% 96% 98% 91% 81% 100% 87% 89% 97% 98% 98%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1196 Points (5%)
min: 1795 avg: 1834 median: 1848 (8%) max: 1859 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 64% 97% 100% 99%
min: 1553 avg: 1695 median: 1710 (7%) max: 1838 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 69 W TDP 86 W TDP 98 W TDP 134 W 83% 94% 92% 92% 96% 100% 90% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
7878 Points (25%)
min: 10276 avg: 12524 median: 13538 (43%) max: 13757 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 57% 75% 100% 98%
min: 8374 avg: 10525 median: 9892 (31%) max: 12717 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 69 W TDP 86 W TDP 98 W TDP 134 W 65% 89% 72% 79% 92% 100% 82% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5114 avg: 5134 median: 5134 (51%) max: 5154 Points
min: 7925 avg: 7957 median: 7932 (79%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 64% 99% 99% 100%
min: 7191 avg: 7533 median: 7650 (76%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 82% 96% 95% 99% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 28937 avg: 29224 median: 29223.5 (29%) max: 29510 Points
min: 39510 avg: 46971 median: 50218 (50%) max: 51184 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 57% 77% 98% 100%
min: 30682 avg: 36787 median: 36900 (37%) max: 41134 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 63% 72% 78% 98% 100%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
786 ms (1%)
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 499 (1%) max: 582 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 508 (1%) max: 608 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 102.4 avg: 107.1 median: 107.1 (1%) max: 111.7 ms
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94352 Points (79%)
min: 84027 avg: 87439 median: 86645 (72%) max: 92438 Points
CPU TDP 55 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W 92% 89% 100% 98% 91%
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 249 avg: 259 median: 259 (73%) max: 269 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 93%
min: 239 avg: 262 median: 264 (74%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 140 W 89% 96% 95% 94% 97% 89% 100% 95% 98% 92% 98%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
214 Points (39%)
min: 285 avg: 303.2 median: 300 (55%) max: 331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 54% 95% 86% 100% 95% 87% 90%
min: 263 avg: 297.3 median: 296 (54%) max: 332 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 78% 92% 88% 91% 93% 89% 88% 100% 89% 92% 100% 88% 86% 95% 84% 86% 90% 91% 89%
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (74%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (85%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1727 avg: 1945 median: 1944.5 (74%) max: 2138 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 74% 94% 85% 100% 82% 90%
min: 1515 avg: 1846 median: 1872 (72%) max: 2108 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 77% 85% 88% 88% 100% 91% 87% 93% 85% 100% 89% 80% 90% 82% 90% 96% 93%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
64.2 Watt (11%)
min: 82.3 avg: 117 median: 117.5 (20%) max: 174.7 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 127% 122% 122% 112% 115% 113% 100%
min: 52 avg: 109.2 median: 101.2 (17%) max: 180 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 123% 130% 129% 118% 120% 108% 124% 117% 108% 112% 112% 112% 103% 111% 119% 113% 100% 110% 106%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
65.1 Watt (12%)
min: 77.7 avg: 130.6 median: 138.5 (25%) max: 166 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 126% 117% 123% 106% 108% 100% 100%
min: 74.6 avg: 126.3 median: 124 (23%) max: 222 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 80 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 137% 137% 142% 132% 137% 129% 142% 127% 128% 127% 124% 130% 100% 122% 132% 117% 117% 120% 120%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.2 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (25%) max: 63 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 156% 100%
min: 4.05 avg: 29.1 median: 27 (18%) max: 96.8 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W TDP 110 W TDP 140 W 100% 134% 121% 111% 112% 142% 135% 120% 107% 119%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 7.99 avg: 18.1 median: 14.8 (16%) max: 34.3 Watt
CPU TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 80 W TDP 90 W 100% 125% 119% 104%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
25.1 Points per Watt (19%)
min: 17.2 avg: 20.7 median: 20.6 (15%) max: 25.4 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 99% 95% 100% 76% 85% 68% 69%
min: 13.6 avg: 19.9 median: 19.1 (14%) max: 27.5 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 35 W TDP 45 W TDP 55 W TDP 60 W TDP 65 W TDP 69 W TDP 75 W TDP 86 W TDP 90 W TDP 98 W TDP 110 W TDP 115 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W TDP 135 W TDP 140 W 70% 85% 91% 77% 100% 69% 89% 66% 73% 72% 77% 50% 72% 86% 64% 65% 79% 64%
Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS → 100% n=37 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 144% n=37 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900H → 131% n=37
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 13. 08:09:24
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 11689 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 14043 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731481764s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11689 +0.004s ... 0.012s
#9 got single benchmarks 11689 +0.007s ... 0.019s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.004s ... 0.023s
#11 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.016s ... 0.039s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 14043 +0.004s ... 0.043s
#13 got single benchmarks 14043 +0.043s ... 0.086s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.086s
#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.109s ... 0.196s
#16 return log +0s ... 0.196s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte