Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 5 7520C vs Intel Celeron N5095A

AMD Ryzen 5 7520C

AMD R5 7520C

Der AMD Ryzen 5 7520C ist ein Mobilprozessor für günstige Notebooks basierend auf die Mendocino Serie. Er integriert vier ältere Zen 2 Kerne (wie bei der Ryzen 4000 Mobile Serie) mit 2,8 - 4,3 GHz und 4 MB L3 Cache. Dank SMT/Hyperthreading können 8 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeitet werden. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt Dual-Channel LPDDR5-5500 MHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte nutzt die aktuelle RDNA 2 Architektur, jedoch nur mit 2 CUs (128 Shader) und taktet im 7520C mit bis zu 1,9 GHz.

Identisch zum Ryzen 5 7520U und gedacht für dein Einsatz in Chromebooks.

Der Chip wird im relativ aktuellen 6nm FinFET Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelAMD Ryzen 5 7520CIntel Celeron N5095A
CodenameMendocino (Zen 2)Jasper Lake
SeriesAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)Intel Jasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C « 2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320C compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U compare2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220C compare2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U compare2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120C compare2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2800 - 4300 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 8
4 x 4.3 GHz AMD Zen 2
4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.com
SocketBGA1338

Benchmarks

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 24. 00:54:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15040 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734998057s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:09 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15040 +0s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 15040 +0s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0s ... 0.007s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.007s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.007s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.007s

#13 return log +0.005s ... 0.012s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)