AMD Ryzen 5 2400G vs Intel Core i9-12900HK
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G ► remove from comparison
Der AMD Ryzen 5 2400G ist ein Desktop-Prozessor mit integrierter Vega Grafikkarte. Der SoC beinhaltet 4 Zen Kerne (Quad-Core CPU) die von 3,6 - 3,9 GHz getaktet werden und dank SMT/HyperThreading 8 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeiten können. Der TDP ist mit 65 Watt spezifiziert. Der L3-Cache beträgt beim 2400G 4 MB. Weiters ist eine Radeon RX Vega 11 getaufte Grafikkarte mit 11 CUs (alle 704 Shader bei maximal 1250 MHz) integriert. Der integrierte Speichercontroller unterstützt maximal Dual-Channel DDR4-2933.
Detaillierte Informationen über die Raven Ridge APUs finden sie in unserem Launchartikel .
Intel Core i9-12900HK ► remove from comparison
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist eine High-End-CPU auf Basis der neuen Alder-Lake-Architektur, die im Januar 2022 vorgestellt wurde. Die CPU basiert auf den Alder Lake-P Chip (für H und P-Serie) und bietet alle 6 Performance Kerne (P-Kerne, Golden Cove Architektur) und 8 Effizienzkerne (E-Kerne, Gracemont Architektur). Die P-Kerne unterstützten Hyperthreading (daher gemeinsam 20 Threads) und takten von 2,5 bis 5 GHz. Die E-Kerne takten von 1,8 - 3,8 GHz und sollen eine vergleichbare Performance wie alte Skylake Kerne bieten (z.B. i7-6920HQ ). Die K-Variante bezeichnet den freien Multiplikator, wodurch sich die CPU übertakten lässt. Im Unterschied zum 12900H, bietet der 12900HK nur die "Essentials"-Features von vPro.
Performance
Im Vergleich zum Intel Core i9-11980HK (Tiger Lake-H mit 8 Kernen) kann der 12900HK in allen Bereichen punkten. Die neuen Golden Cove Kerne bieten eine leicht höhere Single Thread Performance und dank der gesamt 14 Kerne können Multi-Thread-Anwendungen deutlich beschleunigt werden. Intel gibt z.b. bei Spielen eine durchschnittlich 13% höhere Performance an und bei Blender Rendering 30% weniger Renderzeit (BMW Car Demo). In unseren Tests ist die Performance stark abhängig von den TDP Settings und der Kühlung und kann sich im Schnitt etwas vom Ryzen 9 6900HX absetzen (+11% zur Zeit des Schreibens, siehe Vergleich ).
Grafikeinheit
Wie auch der Vorgänger, integriert Intel in Alder Lake eine Intel Xe basierende Grafikeinheit. Beim 12900HK sind alle 96 EUs aktiviert und takten mit bis zu 1,45 GHz.
Features
Wie auch Tiger Lake, hat auch Alder-Lake-P WiFi 6E und Thunderbolt 4 (4x) teilintegriert. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200 und LPDDR4x-4267. Der integrierte Gaussian and Neural Accelerator (GNA) ist nun in Version 3.0 verbaut. Die Media Engine Quick Sync 8 ist die selbe wie in Rocket Lake und unterstützt MPEG-2, AVC, VC-1 Decode, JPEG, VP8 Decode, VP9, HEVC und AV1 Decode. Der Chip unterstützt nur PCIe 4.0 (x8 for GPU und zwei x4 für SSDs).
Leistungsaufnahme
Der Intel Core i9-12900HK ist mit 45 Watt TDP angegeben (PL2 115 Watt). Die meisten Notebooks werden aber einen PL1 von etwa 60 Watt erlauben. Bei geringer Last, sollte der Stromverbrauch dank der sparsamen Gracemont Kerne sehr gut sein. Gefertigt wird der 12900HK im modernen Intel 7 Prozess (10 nm SuperFin).
Model AMD Ryzen 5 2400G Intel Core i9-12900HK Series AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) Intel Alder Lake-P Codename Zen Alder Lake-H Serie: Alder Lake-P Alder Lake-H Clock 3600 - 3900 MHz 1800 - 5000 MHz L1 Cache 384 KB 1.2 MB L2 Cache 2 MB 11.5 MB L3 Cache 4 MB 24 MB Cores / Threads 4 / 8 14 / 20 TDP 65 Watt 45 Watt Transistors 4500 Million Technology 14 nm 10 nm Socket AM4 BGA1744 Features XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT DDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266/DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-5200 RAM, PCIe 4, Thr. Director, DL Boost, GNA, vPro Ess., MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA iGPU AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 ( - 1250 MHz)Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ( - 1450 MHz)Architecture x86 x86 Announced Manufacturer products.amd.com ark.intel.com max. Temp. 100 °C
Benchmarks Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R5 2400G
26.5 pt (44%)
...
...
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i9-12900HK
39.4 pt (66%)
...
...
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 105 avg: 109.5 median: 109.5 (62%) max: 114 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 92% 100%
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 746 avg: 811 median: 811 (15%) max: 876 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W 100% 85%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 13410 avg: 17662 median: 18373 (17%) max: 19282 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 77% 82% 71% 96% 97% 100% 100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1586 avg: 1797 median: 1901 (81%) max: 1940 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 76% 97% 82% 100% 98% 86% 98%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 381 avg: 382.5 median: 382.5 (42%) max: 384 Points
min: 596 avg: 679 median: 685 (76%) max: 739 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 73% 99% 83% 93% 100% 81% 99%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 1804 avg: 1850 median: 1849.5 (5%) max: 1895 Points
min: 5168 avg: 6742 median: 7040 (17%) max: 7366 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 63% 83% 72% 96% 95% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 828 avg: 844 median: 846.5 (5%) max: 856 Points
min: 1975 avg: 2695 median: 2836 (18%) max: 2944 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 53% 84% 68% 95% 100% 98% 100%
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 153.2 avg: 155.6 median: 155.7 (44%) max: 158 Points
min: 226 avg: 258.1 median: 270 (76%) max: 279 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 69% 96% 81% 100% 99% 86% 97%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
9.5 Points (12%)
min: 23.44 avg: 27.9 median: 27.3 (35%) max: 33 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 29% 83% 71% 100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.8 Points (42%)
min: 2.69 avg: 3.1 median: 3.3 (77%) max: 3.28 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 54% 99% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
4805 Points (29%)
min: 7710 avg: 8840 median: 9397 (57%) max: 9412 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 51% 100% 82% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
21024 Points (15%)
min: 48838 avg: 51988 median: 49924 (36%) max: 57202 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 37% 87% 85% 100%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
30473 Points (19%)
min: 75223 avg: 75585 median: 75585 (48%) max: 75947 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 40% 100% 99%
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
7495 Points (9%)
min: 12378 avg: 13841 median: 13840.5 (17%) max: 15303 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 49% 100% 81%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
198 s (2%)
min: 186.394 avg: 193.7 median: 193.7 (2%) max: 201.062 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 100% 100%
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
6.9 s (1%)
min: 3.375 avg: 3.4 median: 3.4 (1%) max: 3.454 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 101% 101%
3846 Points (6%)
min: 7387 avg: 8565 median: 8735 (14%) max: 9573 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 40% 91% 77% 100%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 19478 avg: 20059 median: 19885 (11%) max: 20814 MIPS
min: 55620 avg: 68839 median: 72836 (42%) max: 75564 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 61% 85% 77% 93% 99% 100% 94%
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 3855 avg: 3972 median: 3909 (46%) max: 4153 MIPS
min: 5257 avg: 5769 median: 5803 (68%) max: 6186 MIPS
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 75% 98% 86% 100% 99% 85% 94%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
48 fps (16%)
min: 113.7 avg: 132.8 median: 125.1 (42%) max: 159.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 30% 78% 71% 100%
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
171.6 fps (40%)
min: 276 avg: 298 median: 300.4 (69%) max: 317.5 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 54% 100% 87% 95%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 4.86 avg: 12.2 median: 5.1 (9%) max: 26.5 fps
min: 15.7 avg: 19.4 median: 20.5 (36%) max: 21.6 fps
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 69% 81% 73% 85% 93% 96% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.5 GB/s (15%)
min: 1.2 avg: 1.3 median: 1.3 (38%) max: 1.5 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 33% 80% 87% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.8 GB/s (14%)
min: 2.2 avg: 2.4 median: 2.3 (40%) max: 2.6 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 31% 85% 88% 100%
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
5.2 GB/s (14%)
min: 13 avg: 14.5 median: 14.1 (37%) max: 16.3 GB/s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 32% 80% 87% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
413 Seconds (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 550 avg: 551 median: 550.5 (4%) max: 551 Seconds
min: 172.5 avg: 191.9 median: 181 (1%) max: 234 Seconds
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101% 101%
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.648 avg: 0.7 median: 0.7 (15%) max: 0.683 sec
min: 0.4155 avg: 0.5 median: 0.4 (9%) max: 0.4997 sec
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 104% 103% 105% 105% 103% 104%
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
6672 Points (14%)
min: 13096 avg: 15289 median: 15597.5 (33%) max: 16864 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 40% 86% 78% 100% 99%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
11.3 s (2%)
min: 7.281 avg: 7.7 median: 7.3 (2%) max: 8.438 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 101% 101% 101%
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
25.1 s (1%)
min: 16.1 avg: 17.2 median: 16.5 (1%) max: 18.844 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
624 s (3%)
min: 383.9 avg: 405.7 median: 397.4 (2%) max: 435.936 s
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 100% 101% 101% 101%
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 59882 avg: 65775 median: 60056 (46%) max: 77386 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 110 W 78% 77% 100%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 7325 avg: 8058 median: 8241 (21%) max: 8607 Points
min: 17378 avg: 22097 median: 22297.5 (56%) max: 25556 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 60% 85% 70% 98% 94% 84% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
58446 Points (47%)
min: 66129 avg: 78262 median: 71995 (58%) max: 96663 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 60% 100% 68% 74%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
57457 Points (47%)
min: 65657 avg: 78481 median: 72055 (58%) max: 97730 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W 59% 100% 67% 74%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 32977 avg: 55118 median: 65172 (54%) max: 67206 Points
min: 75600 avg: 88980 median: 88770 (74%) max: 102779 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W 54% 100% 74% 92% 81%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 6650 avg: 7355 median: 7465 (19%) max: 7951 Points
min: 16214 avg: 18700 median: 18585 (47%) max: 21231 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 35% 89% 76% 92% 94% 83% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 10705 avg: 10784 median: 10784 (19%) max: 10863 Points
min: 23308 avg: 27794 median: 28300 (50%) max: 31045 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 65% 87% 75% 94% 100% 86% 97%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 3198 avg: 3414 median: 3414 (14%) max: 3630 Points
min: 9449 avg: 12247 median: 12430.5 (52%) max: 14252 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 58% 83% 66% 90% 98% 82% 100%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Single-Core
2611 Points (66%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 Multi-Core
10721 Points (42%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 970 avg: 1081 median: 1001 (39%) max: 1223 Points
min: 1596 avg: 1793 median: 1868 (73%) max: 1918 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 68% 97% 97% 100% 83% 98%
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3462 avg: 4780 median: 3885 (7%) max: 6372 Points
min: 10378 avg: 13176 median: 13682.5 (25%) max: 14294 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 55% 87% 100% 98% 91% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 967 avg: 989 median: 990 (4%) max: 1010 Points
min: 1795 avg: 1834 median: 1848 (8%) max: 1859 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 53% 97% 100% 99%
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 3557 avg: 3736 median: 3825 (12%) max: 3826 Points
min: 10276 avg: 12524 median: 13538 (43%) max: 13757 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 134 W 27% 75% 100% 98%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4181 avg: 4319 median: 4268 (43%) max: 4508 Points
min: 7925 avg: 7957 median: 7932 (79%) max: 8015 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 54% 99% 99% 100%
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 13259 avg: 13858 median: 13653 (14%) max: 14662 Points
min: 39510 avg: 46971 median: 50218 (50%) max: 51184 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 27% 77% 98% 100%
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4226 Points (58%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
13211 Points (32%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 962 avg: 980 median: 978 (1%) max: 1000 ms
min: 490 avg: 520 median: 499 (1%) max: 582 ms
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 102.4 avg: 107.1 median: 107.1 (1%) max: 111.7 ms
CPU TDP 86 W TDP 110 W 100% 100%
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
94352 Points (79%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 249 avg: 259 median: 259 (73%) max: 269 Points
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 100% 93%
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 169 avg: 170.7 median: 170 (31%) max: 173 Points
min: 285 avg: 303.2 median: 300 (55%) max: 331 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 50% 95% 86% 100% 95% 87% 90%
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
43.3 MB/s (32%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
2539 MB/s (74%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
81.5 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
3600 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
20584 Points (85%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1727 avg: 1945 median: 1944.5 (74%) max: 2138 Points
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 74% 94% 85% 100% 82% 90%
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 100.5 avg: 103.5 median: 103.5 (18%) max: 106.5 Watt
min: 82.3 avg: 117 median: 117.5 (20%) max: 174.7 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 118% 122% 122% 112% 115% 113% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 95.3 avg: 99.7 median: 99.7 (18%) max: 104.1 Watt
min: 77.7 avg: 130.6 median: 138.5 (25%) max: 166 Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 117% 117% 123% 106% 108% 100% 100%
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 13.2 avg: 38.1 median: 38.1 (25%) max: 63 Watt
CPU TDP 45 W TDP 65 W 156% 100%
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
9 Points per Watt (7%)
min: 17.2 avg: 20.7 median: 20.6 (15%) max: 25.4 Points per Watt
CPU TDP ? TDP 45 W TDP 65 W TDP 86 W TDP 110 W TDP 120 W TDP 134 W 35% 95% 100% 76% 85% 68% 69%
Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 5 2400G → 100% n=42 Average Benchmarks Intel Core i9-12900HK → 233% n=42
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
v1.28
log 17. 09:48:31
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9894 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 14041 +0s ... 0s
#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731833311s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s
#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9894 +0.004s ... 0.007s
#8 got single benchmarks 9894 +0.006s ... 0.013s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 14041 +0.004s ... 0.018s
#10 got single benchmarks 14041 +0.017s ... 0.035s
#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.035s
#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.061s ... 0.096s
#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.098s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte