Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C vs Intel Celeron N5095A vs AMD Athlon Gold 7220C

AMD Ryzen 3 7320C

► remove from comparison AMD R3 7320C

Der AMD Ryzen 3 7320C ist ein Mobilprozessor für günstige Notebooks basierend auf die Mendocino Serie. Er integriert vier ältere Zen 2 Kerne (wie bei der Ryzen 4000 Mobile Serie) mit 2,4 - 4,1 GHz und 4 MB L3 Cache. Dank SMT/Hyperthreading können 8 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeitet werden. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt Dual-Channel LPDDR5-5500 MHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte nutzt die aktuelle RDNA 2 Architektur, jedoch nur mit 2 CUs (128 Shader) und taktet im 7320C mit bis zu 1,9 GHz.

Der Ryzen 3 7320C ist identisch zum Ryzen 5 7320U und für Chromebooks gedacht.

Im Vergleich zur schnelleren Ryzen 5 7520C, sind nur die CPU-Kerne um 200 MHz (Boost) bzw. 400 MHz (Basis) geringer getaktet.

Der Chip wird im relativ aktuellen 6nm FinFET Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt. Durch den relativ geringen TDP von 15W eignet sich der 7320C auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

AMD Athlon Gold 7220C

► remove from comparison AMD Athlon 7220C

Der AMD Athlon Gold 7220C ist ein Mobilprozessor für günstige Chromebooks basierend auf die Mendocino Serie. Er integriert zwei ältere Zen 2 Kerne (wie bei der Ryzen 4000 Mobile Serie) mit 2,4 - 3,7 GHz und 4 MB L3 Cache. Dank SMT/Hyperthreading können 4 Threads gleichzeitig bearbeitet werden. Der integrierte Speicherkontroller unterstützt Dual-Channel LPDDR5-5500 MHz. Die integrierte Grafikkarte nutzt die aktuelle RDNA 2 Architektur, jedoch nur mit 2 CUs (128 Shader) und taktet im 7220C mit bis zu 1,9 GHz.

Technisch ist der 7220C identisch zum Athlon Gold 7220U für (Windows) Notebooks.

Im Vergleich zur schnelleren Ryzen 5 7520U, sind nur zwei CPU-Kerne mit niedrigerer Taktung verbaut.

Der Chip wird im relativ aktuellen 6nm FinFET Prozess bei TSMC gefertigt.

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 7320CIntel Celeron N5095AAMD Athlon Gold 7220C
SeriesAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)Intel Jasper LakeAMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
CodenameMendocino (Zen 2)Jasper LakeMendocino (Zen 2)
Serie: Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) Mendocino (Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320C « 2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220C2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120C2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60052 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N60001.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N50952 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51052 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N51001.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45052 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N45001.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7520C2.8 - 4.3 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 7320C2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220U2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Gold 7220C « 2.4 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
AMD Athlon Silver 7120C2.4 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2400 - 4100 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz2400 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache4 MB4 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 8
4 x 4.1 GHz AMD Zen 2
4 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
2 / 4
2 x 3.7 GHz AMD Zen 2
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Technology6 nm10 nm6 nm
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHAXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
iGPUAMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.amd.comark.intel.comwww.amd.com
SocketBGA1338

Benchmarks

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 12. 06:45:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15042 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 15046 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731390353s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:16:49 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 15042 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#9 got single benchmarks 15042 +0.003s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#11 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.014s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 15046 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#13 got single benchmarks 15046 +0s ... 0.014s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.014s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.014s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)