NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für große Notebooks / mobile Workstations. Die Max-Q Variante ist eine auf Effizienz optimierte Version der RTX 4000 mit verringerten Taktraten. Aktuell gibt es anscheinend 3 verschiedene Max-Q Varianten mit einem TGP von 90, 85 und 80 Watt.
Variante Shader TGP (W) Base (MHz) Boost (MHz) Quadro RTX 4000 Desktop 2304 160 1005 1545 Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile 2560 110 1350 1770 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 90 960 1485 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 85 900 1440 Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q 2560 80 780 1380 GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile 2304 115? 1215 1440
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Features
Der TU104-Chip wird in 12nm gefertigt und bietet eine Reihe neuer Features, wie DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling) und Real Time Ray Tracing. Dadurch lassen sich vor allem Beleuchtungseffekte sehr viel realistischer darstellen. Weiterhin gibt es Support für DisplayPort 1.4 (ready), HDMI 2.0b, HDR, Simultaneous Multi-Projection (SMP) sowie H.265 Video De- und Encoding (PlayReady 3.0).
Performance
Je nach Variante, kann die Max-Q Version deutlich Performance zur normalen RTX 4000 einbüßen (bis zu 12 % weniger Boost-Takt). Dadurch kann sich die Max-Q Variante schon der Performance der RTX 3000 nähern. Bei Spielen sollte sich die Performance in der Nähe der mobilen RTX 2070 einreihen.
Mit einem TGP von 80-90 Watt eignet sich die Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q trotzdem nur für größere Notebooks.
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia RTX A500 Laptop GPU oder A500 Mobile (für Laptops) ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für mobile Workstations. Sie basiert wie die RTX A1000 auf die Consumer RTX 3050 , jedoch wurde der Speicherbus auf 64-Bit limitiert. Im Vergleich zu einer günstigeren GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU mit Studio Treibern, bietet die RTX A500 zertifizierte Treiber für zahlreiche professionelle Applikationen.
Wie auch die GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile , ist auch die RTX A2000 in verschiedenen TGP-Versionen erhältlich. Diese rangieren bei der A2000 von 20 - 60 Watt. Je nach verbauter Variante unterscheiden sich die Taktraten von Chip und Speicher und damit auch deutlich die Performance.
Es gibt nun keine Max-Q Variante mehr (die 35+ Versionen heissen auch nur "Laptop GPU"), aber jede TGP-Version kann die Max-Q Technologien nutzen (Dynamic Boost, WhisperMode).
Die professionellen Grafikkarten von Nvidia bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind.
Die Leistung ist abhängig von der TGP-Variante und der verwendeten Kühlung. Bei gleichem TGP sollte sie durch den kleineren Speicherbus und geringere Taktraten etwas unterhalb der RTX A1000 liegen.
Der GA107 Chip bietet 2.560 FP32 ALUs wovon die Hälfte auch INT32 Befehle ausführen können (also 1.280 INT32 ALUs). Bei Turing konnten noch alle Shader FP32 oder INT32 ausführen. Die Raytracing und Tensor Kerne auf dem Chip wurden laut Nvidia ebenfalls verbessert. Weiters integriert der Ampere Chip einen Hardware Video-Encoder (NVENC 5. Generation für H.264 und H.265) und Decoder (7. Generation für zahlreiche Formate
Der GA107 Chip wird bei Samsung im 8nm (8N) Verfahren welches mit dem 7nm Verfahren von TSMC nicht ganz mithalten kann (z.B. von AMD genutzt, aber auch für den professionellen GA100 Ampere Chip).
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU ► remove from comparison
Die Nvidia T550 Mobile (oder auch Quadro T550 Mobile) für Laptops ist eine professionelle Grafikkarte für Notebooks und mobile Workstations der Einstiegsklasse. Sie basiert auf den selben TU117 Turing-Chip wie die Consumer GeForce MX550 und bietet ebenso 1024 Shader und einen 64 Bit Speicherbus. Der Boost-Takt ist jedoch anscheinend etwas höher. Die T550 bietet 4 GB GDDR6 und in Verbindung mit dem 64 Bit Speicherbus ergibt dies eine maximale Bandbreite von 112 GB/s.
Bietet keine eigenen Displayoutputs und muss daher gemeinsam mit einer iGPU betrieben werden und nutzt deren Ausgabe über Optimus.
Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber , welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.
Die kleineren Chips der Turing Serie bietet im Unterschied zu den stärkeren RTX Karten (z.B. Quadro RTX 3000 ) keine Raytracing und Tensor Kerne. Bei der Turing Architektur gab es auch auf der Ebene der CUDA-Kerne deutliche Verbesserungen. Float und INT Operationen können nun gleichzeitig ausgeführt werden, der Cache wurde vereinheitlicht und verbessert und Adaptive Shading eingeführt. Nvidia spricht dadurch von einer bis zu 50% höheren Leistung pro Kern im Vergleich zu Pascal.
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU Quadro Turing Serie Codename N19E-Q3 MAX-Q GA107 TU117 Architektur Turing Ampere Turing Pipelines 2560 - unified 2048 - unified 1024 - unified Kerntakt 780 - 960 - 1380 - 1485 (Boost) MHz 1065 - 1665 (Boost) MHz Speichertakt 14000 MHz 14000 MHz 12000 effective = 1500 MHz Speicherbandbreite 256 Bit 64 Bit 64 Bit Speichertyp GDDR6 GDDR6 GDDR5, GDDR6 Max. Speichergröße 8 GB 4 GB 4 GB Shared Memory nein nein nein API DirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6 DirectX 12_1, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6 Stromverbrauch 80 - 90 Watt 60 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP) 25 Watt (20 - 60 Watt TGP) Transistors 10.8 Billion Herstellungsprozess 12 nm 8 nm 12 nm Features DLSS, Raytraycing, VR Ready, G-SYNC, Vulkan, Multi Monitor Notebookgröße groß (17" z.B.) mittel (15.4" z.B.) Erscheinungsdatum 27.05.2019 30.03.2022 27.05.2022 Raytracing Cores 16 Tensor / AI Cores 64 Theoretical Performance 7.3 TFLOPS FP32 7.2 TFLOPS FP16, 3.7 TFLOPS FP32 Memory Bandwidth 112 GB/s 112 GB/s PCIe 4 Herstellerseite nvdam.widen.net nvdam.widen.net Informationen Optimus only
Benchmarks Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
7.5 pt (23%)
...
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
...
max:
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.4 pt (10%)
...
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
...
max:
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
6724 Points (19%)
min: 3127 avg: 3273 median: 3273 (9%) max: 3419 Points
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 47% 51% 100%
min: 2031 avg: 2187 median: 2066 (6%) max: 2465 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 30% 42% 51% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
6764 Points (18%)
min: 2873 avg: 2995 median: 2994.5 (8%) max: 3116 Points
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 42% 46% 100%
min: 1882 avg: 2021 median: 1928 (5%) max: 2252 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 28% 38% 46% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
23072 Points (3%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
23809 Points (22%)
min: 27001 avg: 28765 median: 28764.5 (27%) max: 30528 Points
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 88% 100% 78%
min: 17399 avg: 17614 median: 17614 (17%) max: 17829 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 58% 88% 100% 78%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
35167 Points (9%)
min: 46927 avg: 48496 median: 48495.5 (12%) max: 50064 Points
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 94% 70%
min: 32743 avg: 33219 median: 33218.5 (8%) max: 33694 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 66% 100% 94% 70%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
15010 Points (25%)
min: 6899 avg: 6955 median: 6954.5 (12%) max: 7010 Points
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 46% 47% 100%
min: 4559 avg: 4786 median: 4581 (8%) max: 5218 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 30% 40% 47% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
17049 Points (19%)
min: 7578 avg: 7598 median: 7597.5 (9%) max: 7617 Points
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 45% 44% 100%
min: 4816 avg: 5100 median: 4890 (6%) max: 5593 Points
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 28% 39% 44% 100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
35402 Points (4%)
88367 Points (10%)
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 40%
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3530 avg: 3590 median: 3589.5 (4%) max: 3649 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 19079 avg: 19888 median: 19888 (26%) max: 20697 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 92%
min: 11213 avg: 11289 median: 11288.5 (15%) max: 11364 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 54% 55% 92%
min: 7405 avg: 8160 median: 8160 (11%) max: 8915 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 36% 49% 55% 92%
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 23464 avg: 23574 median: 23574 (20%) max: 23684 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 99% 100%
min: 10748 avg: 10818 median: 10818 (9%) max: 10888 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 99% 45% 46% 100%
min: 7432 avg: 8067 median: 8066.5 (7%) max: 8701 Points
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 99% 31% 41% 46% 100%
3DMark Vantage + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
40923 Points (12%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
25155 Points (7%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 61% 100%
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU 3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
39319 Points (21%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
24697 Points (13%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 63% 100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
40862 Points (53%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
31003 Points (41%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 76% 100%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CUDA *
min: 142 avg: 146 median: 146 (22%) max: 150 Seconds
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W 100% 102%
min: 278 avg: 282 median: 283 (42%) max: 285 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W 100% 118% 136%
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom OPTIX *
min: 88 avg: 91.5 median: 91.5 (34%) max: 95 Seconds
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W 104% 100%
min: 256 avg: 263.3 median: 265 (99%) max: 269 Seconds
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W 100% 4850% 8700%
SPECviewperf 12 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
116 fps (29%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
126.4 fps (31%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 92% 100%
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
128 fps (19%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
88.4 fps (13%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 69%
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
96.6 fps (21%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
31.8 fps (7%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 33%
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
77.6 fps (21%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
76.9 fps (21%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 99%
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
131 fps (52%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
88 fps (35%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 67%
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
122 fps (20%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
108.2 fps (18%)
GPU TDP ? TDP 35 W 100% 89%
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
175 fps (31%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
min: 112.1 avg: 121.1 median: 121.1 (32%) max: 130 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 86%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 127.43 avg: 129.5 median: 129.5 (35%) max: 131.64 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 99% 97% 100% 85%
specvp13 sw-04 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 95 avg: 98.8 median: 95.8 (26%) max: 105.68 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 99% 72% 89% 100% 85%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
min: 225.4 avg: 245.2 median: 245.2 (27%) max: 265 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 85%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 145.61 avg: 153.2 median: 153.2 (17%) max: 160.83 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 55% 61% 85%
specvp13 snx-03 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 95.8 avg: 101.7 median: 99.7 (11%) max: 109.67 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 37% 48% 61% 85%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
min: 89.3 avg: 93 median: 93 (20%) max: 96.6 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 92%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 31.69 avg: 34.6 median: 34.6 (8%) max: 37.51 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 39% 33% 92%
specvp13 showcase-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 24.8 avg: 26.1 median: 25.3 (6%) max: 28.06 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 26% 34% 33% 92%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
81.9 fps (17%)
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 73.93 avg: 78.3 median: 78.3 (16%) max: 82.72 fps
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 89% 100% 99%
specvp13 medical-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 34.5 avg: 37.2 median: 36.2 (8%) max: 40.74 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 43% 69% 100% 99%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
min: 162 avg: 185 median: 185 (21%) max: 208 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 78%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 121.4 avg: 123.5 median: 123.5 (14%) max: 125.67 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 58% 60% 78%
specvp13 maya-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 77.5 avg: 82 median: 80.9 (9%) max: 87.57 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 38% 50% 60% 78%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
35.3 fps (11%)
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 20.53 avg: 21.4 median: 21.4 (7%) max: 22.26 fps
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 58% 63% 100%
specvp13 energy-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 11.7 avg: 12.4 median: 12 (4%) max: 13.37 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 34% 48% 63% 100%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
min: 162.1 avg: 186.1 median: 186.1 (27%) max: 210 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 77%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 120.07 avg: 121.6 median: 121.6 (18%) max: 123.09 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 59% 57% 77%
specvp13 creo-02 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 82.4 avg: 86.2 median: 85.5 (13%) max: 90.66 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 40% 51% 57% 77%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
min: 181.6 avg: 204.8 median: 204.8 (23%) max: 228 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 80%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 146.08 avg: 154.4 median: 154.4 (17%) max: 162.65 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 64% 71% 80%
specvp13 catia-05 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 104 avg: 110.4 median: 109 (12%) max: 118.22 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 47% 58% 71% 80%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
min: 129.5 avg: 150.8 median: 150.8 (26%) max: 172 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 75%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 80.81 avg: 84 median: 84 (15%) max: 87.19 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 51% 47% 75%
specvp13 3dsmax-06 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 61.6 avg: 63.7 median: 63 (11%) max: 66.38 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 36% 45% 47% 75%
SPECviewperf 2020 specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p
114.4 fps (22%)
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
79.9 fps (16%)
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 70% 100%
specvp2020 solidworks-05 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 46.3 avg: 54 median: 54.3 (11%) max: 61.38 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 44% 62% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 1080p
181 fps (30%)
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 139.98 avg: 148.5 median: 148.5 (24%) max: 157.04 fps
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 77% 87% 100%
specvp2020 snx-04 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 84 avg: 99.4 median: 99.3 (16%) max: 114.82 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 51% 70% 87% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 1080p
38.3 fps (25%)
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 27.58 avg: 28.3 median: 28.3 (19%) max: 28.96 fps
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 72% 76% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 13.5 avg: 15.6 median: 15.4 (10%) max: 17.87 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 38% 59% 76% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 1080p
159.9 fps (18%)
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 143.05 avg: 143.6 median: 143.6 (16%) max: 144.17 fps
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 89% 90% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 86.9 avg: 98.2 median: 98.1 (11%) max: 109.68 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 58% 79% 90% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 1080p
35.7 fps (24%)
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 20.44 avg: 21.4 median: 21.4 (14%) max: 22.29 fps
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 57% 62% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 10.6 avg: 12.1 median: 12 (8%) max: 13.56 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 32% 48% 62% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 1080p
88.3 fps (43%)
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 50.44 avg: 61.4 median: 61.4 (30%) max: 72.31 fps
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 82% 57% 100%
specvp2020 creo-03 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 44.5 avg: 46.2 median: 45.7 (23%) max: 48.5 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 53% 67% 57% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 1080p
60.5 fps (37%)
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 34.65 avg: 36.9 median: 36.9 (22%) max: 39.09 fps
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 57% 65% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 22.4 avg: 25.6 median: 24.9 (15%) max: 29.58 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 39% 53% 65% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p
64.1 fps (20%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 32.99 avg: 35.4 median: 35.4 (11%) max: 37.79 fps
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 59% 51% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 1080p + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 28.3 avg: 30 median: 29.6 (9%) max: 32.03 fps
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 45% 54% 51% 100%
specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-05 4k
63.1 fps (19%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 snx-04 4k
111.4 fps (11%)
specvp2020 snx-04 4k + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
98.2 fps (10%)
GPU TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 88% 100%
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 medical-03 4k
14.6 fps (14%)
specvp2020 medical-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
11.9 fps (11%)
GPU TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 82% 100%
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 maya-06 4k
75.8 fps (12%)
specvp2020 maya-06 4k + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
66.7 fps (11%)
GPU TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 88% 100%
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 energy-03 4k
41.4 fps (6%)
specvp2020 energy-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
143.3 fps (20%)
GPU TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 29%
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 creo-03 4k
58.7 fps (28%)
specvp2020 creo-03 4k + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
37.6 fps (18%)
GPU TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 64% 100%
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 catia-06 4k
36 fps (24%)
specvp2020 catia-06 4k + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
12.9 fps (8%)
GPU TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 36% 100%
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k
45.3 fps (19%)
specvp2020 3dsmax-07 4k + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
17.1 fps (7%)
GPU TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 38% 100%
specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 4k
10.8 fps (3%)
specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU SPECviewperf 2020 - specvp2020 solidworks-07 1080p
88.5 fps (24%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6844 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
212.8 fps (70%)
Cinebench R15 + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 191 avg: 210.5 median: 210.5 (12%) max: 230 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 80 W 100% 83%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min: 232 avg: 247 median: 247 (14%) max: 262 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 88% 100% 89% 73%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 184.9 avg: 193 median: 189.2 (11%) max: 205 fps
GPU TDP ? TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 99% 80% 100% 99% 82%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100%
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
99.6 % (100%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 100% 100% 100% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
28.5 fps (12%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
64.7 fps (12%)
19 fps (3%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 29% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
166.1 fps (12%)
43.5 fps (3%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 26% 100%
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
174.1 fps (20%)
118.3 fps (13%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 68% 100%
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
232.7 fps (5%)
172.6 fps (4%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 74% 100%
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
321.7 fps (19%)
229.9 fps (13%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 71% 100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
554 fps (4%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
449.9 fps (4%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 81% 100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
104.6 fps (1%)
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W 100% 100%
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official High Offscreen 2160
3.6 fps (1%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 40215 avg: 41313 median: 41313 (12%) max: 42411 Points
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W 100% 95%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 20666 avg: 30177 median: 30176.5 (8%) max: 39687 Points
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W 52% 100%
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
1023 Samples/s (4%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
2268 Samples/s (4%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
8197 Points (9%)
5190 Points (6%)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W 63% 100%
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
149.2 Watt (21%)
min: 49.1 avg: 51.7 median: 51.7 (7%) max: 54.3 Watt
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 118% 117% 100%
min: 34.2 avg: 34.7 median: 34.7 (5%) max: 35.1 Watt
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 35 W TDP 80 W 121% 118% 117% 100%
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
152.8 Watt (21%)
54.5 Watt (8%)
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 117% 100%
min: 41.2 avg: 41.3 median: 41.3 (6%) max: 41.4 Watt
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 120% 117% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
168.4 Watt (37%)
56.5 Watt (12%)
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 139% 100%
min: 42.9 avg: 44.1 median: 44.1 (10%) max: 45.3 Watt
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 143% 139% 100%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.4 fps per Watt (34%)
0.6 fps per Watt (50%)
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 68%
min: 0.4393 avg: 0.4 median: 0.4 (40%) max: 0.4569 fps per Watt
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 81% 100% 68%
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.4 fps per Watt (34%)
0.6 fps per Watt (47%)
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 100% 72%
min: 0.4734 avg: 0.5 median: 0.5 (40%) max: 0.483 fps per Watt
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 84% 100% 72%
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
63.4 Watt (20%)
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
58.1 Watt (7%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
48 dB(A) (77%)
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
46 dB(A) (74%)
GPU TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 96% 100%
Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU
min: 38.2 avg: 40.4 median: 40.5 (65%) max: 42.5 dB(A)
GPU TDP 20 W TDP 30 W TDP 80 W 82% 92% 100%
Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 100% n=27 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU → 72% n=27 Average Benchmarks NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 50% n=27
- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Spiele-Benchmarks Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
82.4 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
71.9 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
32.9 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
11.7 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
34.6 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
27.5 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
19.1 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
14.1 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
23.6 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
14.5 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
80.1 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
68.6 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
58.6 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
43.8 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
76.7 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
58.2 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
49.3 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
33.3 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
19.5 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
12.8 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
12 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
10.9 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
24.4 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
18.7 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
14.3 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
8.3 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
10.4 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
4.3 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
17.8 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
57 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
56.3 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
43.1 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
10.9 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
6.6 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
23 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
19.6 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
10.6 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
5.4 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
92.5 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
85.2 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
57.8 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
16.9 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
66.2 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
53.5 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
36.2 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
27.6 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
74.9 [X] HP ZBook Firefly 14 G11 1.47.22.14 D3D12
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H 3.8GHz
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min:
39.5 fps, P1:
61.2 fps, max:
103.9 fps
76.5 ~ 76 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
61.9 62.5 [X] HP ZBook Firefly 14 G11 1.47.22.14 D3D12
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H 3.8GHz
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min:
34.6 fps, P1:
49.8 fps, max:
89.4 fps
~ 62 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
53.6 54.5 [X] HP ZBook Firefly 14 G11 1.47.22.14 D3D12
Intel Core Ultra 7 165H 3.8GHz
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
min:
29 fps, P1:
43.2 fps, max:
79.3 fps
~ 54 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
39.2 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
81 83 ~ 82 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
51 57 ~ 54 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
46 50 ~ 48 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
44 44 ~ 44 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
93.3 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
78.8 fps
119%
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
89.2 98 ~ 94 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
66.2 fps
118%
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
73.9 81.6 ~ 78 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
45.3 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
118 fps
72%
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
78.6 90.4 ~ 85 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
86.5 fps
52%
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
44.2 45.8 ~ 45 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
68.3 fps
47%
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
31.4 32.9 ~ 32 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
46.3 fps
50%
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
23.3 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
29.7 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
131 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
116 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
107 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
101 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
65 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
221 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
178 fps
42%
T550 Laptop GPU:
73 75 78 ~ 75 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
115 fps
48%
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
53.4 56.8 ~ 55 fps
36%
T550 Laptop GPU:
39 40 43 ~ 41 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
62.6 fps
46%
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
26.3 31.1 ~ 29 fps
100%
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q:
36 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
173.3 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
161.7 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
89.7 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
42.9 fps
RTX A500 Laptop GPU:
29.8 fps
Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU → 82% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 49%
Average Gaming NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU → 63% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 58%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 24 82.4 71.9 32.9 11.7 Ghost of Tsushima 34.6 27.5 19.1 14.1 Dragon's Dogma 2 23.6 14.5 Alone in the Dark 80.1 68.6 58.6 43.8 Last Epoch 76.7 58.2 49.3 33.3 Helldivers 2 19.5 12.8 12 10.9 Enshrouded 24.4 18.7 14.3 8.28 Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty 42 32 24 20 10.4 4.29 Baldur's Gate 3 40 33 29 28 17.8 F1 23 57 56.3 43.1 10.9 6.63 Hogwarts Legacy 23 19.6 10.6 5.43 F1 22 92.5 85.2 57.8 16.9 Tiny Tina's Wonderlands 66.2 53.5 36.2 27.6 Strange Brigade 176 76 62 54 39.2 Far Cry 5 82 54 48 44 X-Plane 11.11 116 94 78 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 85 45 32 23.3 Dota 2 Reborn 159 131 104 98 The Witcher 3 155 93 55 29 GTA V 173.3 161.7 89.7 42.9 29.8 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 4 4 8 4 4 7 6 2 7 9 4 11 5 1 5 1 1
NVIDIA T550 Laptop GPU low med. high ultra QHD 4K F1 22 69 62 43 31 F1 2021 153 74 59 37 Strange Brigade 131 52 42 36 Far Cry 5 75 41 38 35 X-Plane 11.11 70 63 57 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 62 31 22 Dota 2 Reborn 117 105 95 88 The Witcher 3 128 75 41 21 GTA V 116 114 62 29 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 6 3 3 6 1 6 2 2 4 1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q low med. high ultra QHD 4K X-Plane 11.11 93.3 78.8 66.2 45.3 Final Fantasy XV Benchmark 118 86.5 68.3 46.3 29.7 Dota 2 Reborn 131 116 107 101 65 The Witcher 3 221 178 115 62.6 36 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 2 2 3 1 4 2 1 1 2 1
v1.28
log 15. 17:01:56
#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 9882 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 11322 +0s ... 0s
#3 checking url part for id 11429 +0s ... 0s
#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731686516s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s
#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:13:12 +0100 +0s ... 0s
#6 composed specs +0.055s ... 0.056s
#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s
#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.056s
#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 9882 +0.032s ... 0.088s
#10 got single benchmarks 9882 +0.004s ... 0.092s
#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11322 +0.004s ... 0.096s
#12 got single benchmarks 11322 +0.008s ... 0.104s
#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 11429 +0s ... 0.104s
#14 got single benchmarks 11429 +0.007s ... 0.111s
#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.111s
#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.088s ... 0.199s
#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.199s
#18 Got 226 rows for game benchmarks. +0.015s ... 0.215s
#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.215s
#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.216s
#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.223s
#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.223s
#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.224s
Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Autor: Klaus Hinum, 8.09.2017 (Update: 1.07.2023)
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
Magyar
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
