Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M520 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

NVIDIA Quadro M520

► remove from comparison

Die NVIDIA Quadro M520 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Einstiegs-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 940MX auf den GM108-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Wie auch einige Varianten der 940MX, bietet die M520 GDDR5 Grafikspeicher und sollte daher etwas schneller sein als die alte Quadro M500M mit DDR3, die sonst jedoch auf den selben Chip basiert.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Derzeit sind noch keine genauen Taktraten bekannt, jedoch sollte sich die Quadro M520 durch GDDR5 Grafikspeicher etwas schneller als die alte Quadro M500M sein.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M520 liegt bei 25 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) und dadurch etwas unterhalb der M500M die mit 30 Watt angegeben wurde. Dadurch ist die Karte auch für dünne und leichte Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Die NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GTX 965M (2. Generation) auf den GM206 Chip mit Maxwell Architektur und noch nicht Pascal wie die stärkeren P-Quadros.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Der maximale Kerntakt der Quadro M2200 liegt bei 1.038 MHz. Die Leistung liegt zwischen der alten Quadro M2000M sowie der Quadro M3000M, liegt aber generell näher an der M3000M (in einigen Fällen sogar gleichauf). Wenig überraschend liegt die Leistung beim Spielen etwa auf dem Niveau der GTX 965M (2. Generation) und knapp hinter der aktuellen GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M2200M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro M2000M und liegt bei 55 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw 39,1 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 15-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Die NVIDIA Quadro M4000M ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige High-End-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 970M auf den GM204-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht und Nachfolgerin der Quadro K4100M (Kepler). Es werden bis zu 4 GB GDDR5 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt die mit 1.250 MHz (5.000 MHz effektiv) getaktet werden und über einen 256 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (160 vs 102,4 GB/s bei der K4100M). 

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Derzeit sind noch keine genauen Taktraten bekannt, jedoch positioniert sich die M4000M als zweit-schnellste mobile Quadro Grafikkarte und sollte somit die Kepler basierte Quadro K4100M deutlich schlagen. Im Vergleich zur GeForce GTX 970M bietet die M4000M jedoch andere Taktraten (höherer Basistakt von 975 versus 924 MHz, jedoch geringerer Boost Takt von 1013 versus 1038 MHz).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M4000M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro K4100M und liegt bei 100 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption). Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für große 17-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M520NVIDIA Quadro M2200NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Quadro M Serie
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitekturMaxwellMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines384 - unified1024 - unified1280 - unified
Kerntakt756 - 1019 (Boost) MHz694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz
Speicherbandbreite64 Bit128 Bit256 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR5GDDR5GDDR5
Max. Speichergröße1024 MB4 GB4 GB
Shared Memoryneinneinnein
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Stromverbrauch25 Watt55 Watt100 Watt
Herstellungsprozess28 nm28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebookgrößemittel (15.4" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum13.01.2017 13.01.2017 02.10.2015
Herstellerseitewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.com
CodenameN17P-Q3
Speichertakt5508 MHz5012 MHz
Transistors4.9 Billion5.2 Billion

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M520
1 pt (3%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.6 pt (8%)
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M4000M
3.4 pt (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
684 Points (2%)
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
614 Points (2%)
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (5%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
166193 Points (17%)
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (29%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
20741 Points (2%)
176003 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
8544 Points (8%)
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (20%)     max: 22003 Points
min: 13452     avg: 17686     median: 17686 (17%)     max: 21920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
13394 Points (3%)
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (9%)     max: 37841 Points
49204 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
2139 Points (4%)
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (9%)     max: 5275 Points
6937 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
2342 Points (3%)
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5869 Points
7723 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
33703 Points (4%)
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (22%)     max: 263022 Points
218874 Points (24%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
2884 Points (4%)
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (10%)     max: 7709 Points
min: 9042     avg: 9296     median: 9295.5 (12%)     max: 9549 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
2658 Points (2%)
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (6%)     max: 7425 Points
10259 Points (9%)
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M520
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
11278 Points (3%)
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M520
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
10861 Points (6%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
24915 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
3DMark 06
17305 Points (23%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 26834     avg: 28150     median: 28149.5 (37%)     max: 29465 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
11.4 fps (3%)
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (8%)     max: 28.1 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
27.9 fps (9%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
28.8 fps (13%)
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
39.5 fps (7%)
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
31.3 fps (19%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.26     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (29%)     max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
111.4 fps (66%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
35.8 fps (20%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 49.11     avg: 51     median: 51 (29%)     max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
58.1 fps (33%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
43.7 fps (33%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 42.66     avg: 49.7     median: 49.7 (38%)     max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
61.3 fps (47%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
16.8 fps (20%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 16.23     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (23%)     max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
18.8 fps (22%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
50.8 fps (38%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 56.6     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (43%)     max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
109.2 fps (82%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
48.3 fps (52%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 47.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (57%)     max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
76.3 fps (82%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
24.8 fps (12%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 55.7     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (27%)     max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
110.2 fps (53%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
40.5 fps (21%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.49     avg: 50.6     median: 50.6 (27%)     max: 52.7 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
82.3 fps (43%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
45.9 fps (11%)
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 85.3     avg: 90.3     median: 86.2 (21%)     max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 80     avg: 88.6     median: 88.6 (22%)     max: 97.1 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
24.1 fps (4%)
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 57.7     avg: 58.3     median: 58.1 (9%)     max: 59 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 92     avg: 109.9     median: 109.9 (16%)     max: 127.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
11.8 fps (3%)
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 31.14     avg: 32.2     median: 32.8 (7%)     max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 40.33     avg: 44.5     median: 44.5 (10%)     max: 48.6 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
8.3 fps (2%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 20.34     avg: 23.6     median: 24.6 (6%)     max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 26.06     avg: 27.2     median: 27.2 (7%)     max: 28.4 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
19.5 fps (5%)
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 46.93     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (13%)     max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 47.6     avg: 55.8     median: 55.8 (15%)     max: 64 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (0%)
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 4.28     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (5%)     max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 6.04     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (6%)     max: 6.9 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
28 fps (11%)
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 68.2     avg: 69.3     median: 68.5 (27%)     max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 58.3     avg: 68.4     median: 68.4 (27%)     max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
26.2 fps (4%)
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 71.4     avg: 72.2     median: 72 (12%)     max: 73.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
min: 71     avg: 79.6     median: 79.6 (13%)     max: 88.1 fps
specvp12 3dsmax-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
19.7 fps (3%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M520
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6813 Points (5%)
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
70.9 fps (23%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
88.6 fps (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
89.3 fps (29%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
75.5 fps (4%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 102.9     avg: 107.4     median: 103.9 (6%)     max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
93.2 fps (5%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M520
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
53.1 fps (6%)
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
74.3 fps (2%)
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
95.4 fps (6%)
219.1 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M520
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
178.5 fps (1%)
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
405 Samples/s (1%)
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (5%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
708 Samples/s (1%)
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (4%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2045 Points (2%)
4332 Points (5%)
5686 Points (6%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
34.6 Watt (5%)
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
43.4 Watt (6%)
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 243% n=27

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 312% n=27

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Prey

Prey

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
85.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
32.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
26.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
38.1  fps
219%
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
259%
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
12  fps
281%
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
3.6  fps
489%
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
64.6  fps
121%
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
23  fps
235%
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
21.9  fps
233%
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
15.9  fps
233%
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
84  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
40  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
6.6  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
72.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
52.5  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
21.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
17.3  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
183.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
120.6  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
49.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
32.1  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M520:
13.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
56.4  fps
247%
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
43.9  fps
240%
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
33  fps
143%
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
28.2  fps
149%
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
50.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
15.2  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
27.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
21  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
11.6  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
5.3  fps
low 1280x768
100%
Quadro M520:
23.6  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
14.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
52.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
14.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
11.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
46  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
20  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
18  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
12  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
30  fps
420%
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
21.5  fps
330%
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
419%
Quadro M4000M:
90  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
13.3  fps
301%
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
414%
Quadro M4000M:
55  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
11.7  fps
291%
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
410%
Quadro M4000M:
48  fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
Quadro M4000M:
20  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
94.5  fps
227%
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
218%
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
31.8  fps
221%
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
230%
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M520:
8.1  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
78.2  fps
190%
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
48.9  fps
243%
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22.3  fps
253%
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
19.1  fps
252%
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
60.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
36.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
17.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
7.4  fps
low 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
135.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
108.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
54  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
36.7  fps
4K 3840 x 2160
100%
Quadro M520:
11  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
18 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
145.6  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
75.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
40.5  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
18.7  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M520:
14.7  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
81.1  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
74.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
30.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
19.6  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
68.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
51.7  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
18.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
12.2  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
54.6  fps
med. 1344x756
100%
Quadro M520:
32.9  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
22.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
16.2  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M520:
138.2  fps
181%
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
76.9  fps
229%
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
255%
Quadro M4000M:
196  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
64.1  fps
237%
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
282%
Quadro M4000M:
181  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
24.2  fps
240%
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
351%
Quadro M4000M:
85  fps
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M520:
188.1  fps
203%
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
97.9  fps
244%
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M520:
59.5  fps
251%
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M520:
28.8  fps
244%
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M520 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 245%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 238%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 355%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 412%

NVIDIA Quadro M520lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Prey85.432.826.722
Ghost Recon Wildlands38.114.3123.6
For Honor64.62321.915.9
Resident Evil 7844022.16.6
Titanfall 272.252.521.317.3
Farming Simulator 17183.1120.649.832.113.7
Battlefield 156.443.93328.2
Civilization VI50.830.415.211.7
Deus Ex Mankind Divided27.22111.65.3
Ashes of the Singularity23.614.312
The Division52.231.814.811.2
Far Cry Primal46201812
Rise of the Tomb Raider3021.513.311.7
Rainbow Six Siege94.560.131.822.88.1
Star Wars Battlefront78.248.922.319.1
Anno 220560.136.217.77.4
World of Warships135.6108.15436.711
Dirt Rally145.675.140.518.714.7
Battlefield Hardline81.174.230.419.6
Dragon Age: Inquisition68.251.718.312.2
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor54.632.922.816.2
BioShock Infinite138.276.964.124.2
Tomb Raider188.197.959.528.8
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
7
9
5
6
10
6
1
15
7
1
20
2




4


NVIDIA Quadro M2200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ghost Recon Wildlands83.437.133.717.6
For Honor7854513714.6
Battlefield 1139.4105.347.142
Rise of the Tomb Raider12671403413.7
Rainbow Six Siege214.2131.270.452.4
Star Wars Battlefront148.811956.448.2
The Witcher 311166351912.7
Thief108.888.674.839.6
Battlefield 4171.5148.3115.947.8
BioShock Infinite25017615258
Tomb Raider381.4238.8149.370.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


4
7

2
5
4

6
3
2
2
8
1



3


NVIDIA Quadro M4000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Rise of the Tomb Raider90554820
BioShock Infinite19618185
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps





1
1

1

1

1
1



1


Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

v1.28
log 24. 17:38:48

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7710 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 6506 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1732466328s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:17:45 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.022s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.022s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7710 +0.021s ... 0.043s

#10 got single benchmarks 7710 +0.004s ... 0.047s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.004s ... 0.051s

#12 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.008s ... 0.059s

#13 getting avg benchmarks for device 6506 +0.004s ... 0.063s

#14 got single benchmarks 6506 +0.004s ... 0.067s

#15 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#16 min, max, avg, median took s +0.056s ... 0.123s

#17 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.123s

#18 Got 170 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.135s

#19 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.135s

#20 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.136s

#21 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.145s

#22 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.145s

#23 return log +0.001s ... 0.146s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)