Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M

Die NVIDIA Quadro M4000M ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige High-End-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 970M auf den GM204-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht und Nachfolgerin der Quadro K4100M (Kepler). Es werden bis zu 4 GB GDDR5 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt die mit 1.250 MHz (5.000 MHz effektiv) getaktet werden und über einen 256 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (160 vs 102,4 GB/s bei der K4100M). 

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Derzeit sind noch keine genauen Taktraten bekannt, jedoch positioniert sich die M4000M als zweit-schnellste mobile Quadro Grafikkarte und sollte somit die Kepler basierte Quadro K4100M deutlich schlagen. Im Vergleich zur GeForce GTX 970M bietet die M4000M jedoch andere Taktraten (höherer Basistakt von 975 versus 924 MHz, jedoch geringerer Boost Takt von 1013 versus 1038 MHz).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M4000M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro K4100M und liegt bei 100 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption). Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für große 17-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Die NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GTX 965M (2. Generation) auf den GM206 Chip mit Maxwell Architektur und noch nicht Pascal wie die stärkeren P-Quadros.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Der maximale Kerntakt der Quadro M2200 liegt bei 1.038 MHz. Die Leistung liegt zwischen der alten Quadro M2000M sowie der Quadro M3000M, liegt aber generell näher an der M3000M (in einigen Fällen sogar gleichauf). Wenig überraschend liegt die Leistung beim Spielen etwa auf dem Niveau der GTX 965M (2. Generation) und knapp hinter der aktuellen GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M2200M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro M2000M und liegt bei 55 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw 39,1 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 15-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro M4000MNVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M Serie
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitekturMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines1280 - unified1024 - unified
Kerntakt975 - 1013 (Boost) MHz694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz
Speichertakt5012 MHz5508 MHz
Speicherbandbreite256 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Speichergröße4 GB4 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Stromverbrauch100 Watt55 Watt
Transistors5.2 Billion4.9 Billion
Herstellungsprozess28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum02.10.2015 13.01.2017
Herstellerseitewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.de
CodenameN17P-Q3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M4000M
3.4 pt (10%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
AMD Radeon R9 M395
3.01 -12%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000
3.02 -11%
AMD Radeon 680M
3.03 -11%
AMD FirePro W7170M
3.06 -10%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
3.23 -5%
AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
3.24 -5%
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
3.24 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M
3.3 -3%
NVIDIA RTX A500 Laptop GPU
3.36 -1%
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3.41
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
3.42 0%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
3.44 1%
NVIDIA T600 Laptop GPU
3.5 3%
AMD Radeon 780M
3.53 4%
Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU
3.59 5%
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
3.65 7%
Intel Arc A310
3.74 10%
Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
3.78 11%
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 (Laptop)
3.85 13%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 498%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 877%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.6 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2.24 -13%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
2.26 -12%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2.27 -12%
AMD Radeon 740M
2.27 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
2.32 -10%
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2.33 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
2.34 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
2.45 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2.5 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
2.58
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
2.62 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
2.68 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
2.69 4%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.71 5%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.8 9%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.8 9%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.89 12%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.91 13%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.98 16%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 691%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 1191%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (5%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (29%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
176003 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 13452     avg: 17686     median: 17686 (17%)     max: 21920 Points
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (20%)     max: 22003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
49204 Points (12%)
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (9%)     max: 37841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
6937 Points (12%)
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (9%)     max: 5275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
7723 Points (9%)
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
218874 Points (24%)
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (22%)     max: 263022 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 9042     avg: 9296     median: 9295.5 (12%)     max: 9549 Points
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (10%)     max: 7709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
10259 Points (9%)
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (6%)     max: 7425 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24915 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark 06
min: 26834     avg: 28150     median: 28149.5 (37%)     max: 29465 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (8%)     max: 28.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
111.4 fps (66%)
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.26     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (29%)     max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
58.1 fps (33%)
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 49.11     avg: 51     median: 51 (29%)     max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
61.3 fps (47%)
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 42.66     avg: 49.7     median: 49.7 (38%)     max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
18.8 fps (22%)
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 16.23     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (23%)     max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
109.2 fps (82%)
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 56.6     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (43%)     max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
76.3 fps (82%)
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 47.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (57%)     max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
110.2 fps (53%)
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 55.7     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (27%)     max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
82.3 fps (43%)
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.49     avg: 50.6     median: 50.6 (27%)     max: 52.7 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 80     avg: 88.6     median: 88.6 (22%)     max: 97.1 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 85.3     avg: 90.3     median: 86.2 (21%)     max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 92     avg: 109.9     median: 109.9 (16%)     max: 127.8 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 57.7     avg: 58.3     median: 58.1 (9%)     max: 59 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 40.33     avg: 44.5     median: 44.5 (10%)     max: 48.6 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 31.14     avg: 32.2     median: 32.8 (7%)     max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 26.06     avg: 27.2     median: 27.2 (7%)     max: 28.4 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 20.34     avg: 23.6     median: 24.6 (6%)     max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 47.6     avg: 55.8     median: 55.8 (15%)     max: 64 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 46.93     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (13%)     max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 6.04     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (6%)     max: 6.9 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 4.28     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (5%)     max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 58.3     avg: 68.4     median: 68.4 (27%)     max: 78.4 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 68.2     avg: 69.3     median: 68.5 (27%)     max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71     avg: 79.6     median: 79.6 (13%)     max: 88.1 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 71.4     avg: 72.2     median: 72 (12%)     max: 73.2 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
89.3 fps (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
88.6 fps (29%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
93.2 fps (5%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 102.9     avg: 107.4     median: 103.9 (6%)     max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (9%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (5%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (4%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
5686 Points (6%)
4332 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 100% n=27

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 81% n=27

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Ghost Recon Wildlands

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M4000M:
90  fps
79%
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M4000M:
55  fps
73%
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M4000M:
48  fps
71%
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M4000M:
20  fps
69%
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
Rainbow Six Siege

Rainbow Six Siege

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
Star Wars Battlefront

Star Wars Battlefront

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
18 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
Battlefield 4

Battlefield 4

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
BioShock Infinite

BioShock Infinite

2013
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M4000M:
196  fps
90%
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M4000M:
181  fps
84%
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M4000M:
85  fps
68%
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M4000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 76%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 71%

NVIDIA Quadro M2200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ghost Recon Wildlands83.437.133.717.6
For Honor7854513714.6
Battlefield 1139.4105.347.142
Rise of the Tomb Raider12671403413.7
Rainbow Six Siege214.2131.270.452.4
Star Wars Battlefront148.811956.448.2
The Witcher 311166351912.7
Thief108.888.674.839.6
Battlefield 4171.5148.3115.947.8
BioShock Infinite25017615258
Tomb Raider381.4238.8149.370.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4
7
2
5
4
6
3
2		2
8
1



3


NVIDIA Quadro M4000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Rise of the Tomb Raider90554820
BioShock Infinite19618185
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps




1
1
1

1
1
1



1


Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 25. 21:22:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6506 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735158171s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 Dec 2024 05:19:07 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.02s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.02s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6506 +0.016s ... 0.036s

#9 got single benchmarks 6506 +0.004s ... 0.04s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.004s ... 0.044s

#11 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.006s ... 0.05s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.05s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.032s ... 0.083s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.083s

#15 Got 75 rows for game benchmarks. +0.004s ... 0.087s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.087s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.087s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.091s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.091s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.093s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)