Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Die NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GTX 965M (2. Generation) auf den GM206 Chip mit Maxwell Architektur und noch nicht Pascal wie die stärkeren P-Quadros.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Der maximale Kerntakt der Quadro M2200 liegt bei 1.038 MHz. Die Leistung liegt zwischen der alten Quadro M2000M sowie der Quadro M3000M, liegt aber generell näher an der M3000M (in einigen Fällen sogar gleichauf). Wenig überraschend liegt die Leistung beim Spielen etwa auf dem Niveau der GTX 965M (2. Generation) und knapp hinter der aktuellen GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M2200M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro M2000M und liegt bei 55 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw 39,1 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 15-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q

Die Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q (für Laptops, GN20-E5) bezeichnet eine GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU mit Max-Q Technologien. Früher waren die Max-Q-Varianten die Stromsparversionen, mit der RTX 3000 Serie kann jedoch jede TGP-Variante mit Max-Q Technologien ausgestattet werden.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro M2200NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3000 Serie
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M compare 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti compare 10752 @ 1.56 - 1.86 GHz384 Bit @ 21000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 compare 10496 @ 1.4 - 1.7 GHz384 Bit @ 19500 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti compare 10240 @ 1.37 - 1.67 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB compare 8960/ cores @ 1.26 - 1.71 GHz384 Bit @ 19000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 compare 8704 @ 1.45 - 1.71 GHz320 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti compare 6144 @ 1.58 - 1.77 GHz256 Bit @ 19000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU compare 7424 @ 0.98 - 1.59 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 compare 5888 @ 1.5 - 1.73 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU compare 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti compare 4864 @ 1.41 - 1.67 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU compare 5888 @ 0.92 - 1.48 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU compare 5120 @ 0.78 - 1.29 GHz256 Bit @ 14000 MHz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 compare 3584 @ 1.32 - 1.78 GHz192 Bit @ 15000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q compare 6144 @ 0.78 - 1.25 GHz256 Bit @ 6000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3070 Max-Q 5120 @ 1.29 GHz256 Bit
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU compare 3840 @ 0.82 - 1.7 GHz192 Bit @ 14000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q compare 3840 @ 1.28 GHz192 Bit
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 compare 2560 @ 1.55 - 1.78 GHz128 Bit Bit @ 1750 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 1.22 - 1.49 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU compare 2560 @ 1.24 - 1.49 GHz96 Bit @ 12000 MHz
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU compare 1792 64 Bit
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU compare 2048 @ 1.24 - 1.5 GHz128 Bit @ 12000 MHz
CodenameN17P-Q3GN20-E5 GA104
ArchitekturMaxwellAmpere
Pipelines1024 - unified5120 - unified
Kerntakt694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz1290 (Boost) MHz
Speichertakt5508 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit256 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR5GDDR6
Max. Speichergröße4 GB8 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_2, Shader 6.7, OpenGL 4.6
Stromverbrauch55 Watt80 Watt
Transistors4.9 Billion
Herstellungsprozess28 nm8 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum13.01.2017 04.01.2021
Herstellerseitewww.nvidia.de

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.6 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2.24 -13%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
2.26 -12%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2.27 -12%
AMD Radeon 740M
2.27 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
2.32 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
2.34 -9%
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2.34 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
2.45 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2.5 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
2.58
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
2.62 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
2.68 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
2.69 4%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.71 5%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.8 9%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.8 9%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.89 12%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.91 13%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.98 16%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 691%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 1191%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (5%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (29%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (20%)     max: 22003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (9%)     max: 37841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (9%)     max: 5275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (22%)     max: 263022 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (10%)     max: 7709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (6%)     max: 7425 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24915 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark 06
min: 26834     avg: 28150     median: 28149.5 (37%)     max: 29465 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (8%)     max: 28.1 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 48.26     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (29%)     max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 49.11     avg: 51     median: 51 (29%)     max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 42.66     avg: 49.7     median: 49.7 (38%)     max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 16.23     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (23%)     max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56.6     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (43%)     max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 47.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (57%)     max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 55.7     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (27%)     max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 48.49     avg: 50.6     median: 50.6 (27%)     max: 52.7 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 85.3     avg: 90.3     median: 86.2 (21%)     max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 57.7     avg: 58.3     median: 58.1 (9%)     max: 59 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 31.14     avg: 32.2     median: 32.8 (7%)     max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 20.34     avg: 23.6     median: 24.6 (6%)     max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 46.93     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (13%)     max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 4.28     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (5%)     max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 68.2     avg: 69.3     median: 68.5 (27%)     max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 71.4     avg: 72.2     median: 72 (12%)     max: 73.2 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
88.6 fps (29%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 102.9     avg: 107.4     median: 103.9 (6%)     max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (5%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (4%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
4332 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Ghost Recon Wildlands

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

2016
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
Rainbow Six Siege

Rainbow Six Siege

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
Star Wars Battlefront

Star Wars Battlefront

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
18 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
Battlefield 4

Battlefield 4

2013
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
BioShock Infinite

BioShock Infinite

2013
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider

2013
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

NVIDIA Quadro M2200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ghost Recon Wildlands83.437.133.717.6
For Honor7854513714.6
Battlefield 1139.4105.347.142
Rise of the Tomb Raider12671403413.7
Rainbow Six Siege214.2131.270.452.4
Star Wars Battlefront148.811956.448.2
The Witcher 311166351912.7
Thief108.888.674.839.6
Battlefield 4171.5148.3115.947.8
BioShock Infinite25017615258
Tomb Raider381.4238.8149.370.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4
7
2
5
4
6
3
2		2
8
1



3


Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 10. 05:29:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 10588 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731212980s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:17:12 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.028s ... 0.028s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.013s ... 0.041s

#9 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.007s ... 0.049s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 10588 +0s ... 0.049s

#11 got single benchmarks 10588 +0s ... 0.049s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.068s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.068s

#15 Got 68 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.073s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.073s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.073s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.003s ... 0.077s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.077s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.078s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)