Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1000M

Die NVIDIA Quadro M1000M ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 11_0) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GeForce GTX 950M auf den GM107-Chip der Maxwell-Serie und wird in 28nm bei TSMC hergestellt. Sie bietet jedoch nur 512 Shaderkerne und entspricht dadurch nicht genau einer derzeit erhältlichen GeForce GPU. Die Grafikkarte ist für die Skylake-Generation gedacht und Nachfolgerin der Quadro K1100M (Kepler GK107). Es werden bis zu 2 GB GDDR5 als Grafikspeicher eingesetzt, die mit 1.250 MHz (5.000 MHz effektiv) getaktet werden und über einen 128 Bit Speicherbus angebunden sind (80 vs 44,8 GB/s bei der K1100M). 

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Die M1000M platziert sich deutlich vor der Kepler-basierten Quadro K1100M und schlägt sogar die K2100M. Im Vergleich zur Consumer GeForce GTX 950M, ist die Spieleleistung nur marginal niedriger.

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M1000M liegt laut Nvidia um 5 Watt unterhalb der alten Quadro K1100M bei 40 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption). Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 15-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

NVIDIA Quadro M2200

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200

Die NVIDIA Quadro M2200 ist eine DirectX-12 (FL 12_1) und OpenGL-4.5 fähige Mittelklasse-Workstation-Grafikkarte für Notebooks. Sie basiert wie die Consumer GTX 965M (2. Generation) auf den GM206 Chip mit Maxwell Architektur und noch nicht Pascal wie die stärkeren P-Quadros.

Die Quadro-Grafikkarten bieten zertifizierte Treiber, welche auf Stabiltität und Performance bei professionellen Anwendungen (CAD-, DCC-, Medizin-, Prospektions-, Visualisierungsanwendungen) optimiert sind. Dadurch ist die Performance im Vergleich zu den Consumergrafikkarten mit gleichem Chip in diesen Bereichen deutlich besser.

Leistung

Der maximale Kerntakt der Quadro M2200 liegt bei 1.038 MHz. Die Leistung liegt zwischen der alten Quadro M2000M sowie der Quadro M3000M, liegt aber generell näher an der M3000M (in einigen Fällen sogar gleichauf). Wenig überraschend liegt die Leistung beim Spielen etwa auf dem Niveau der GTX 965M (2. Generation) und knapp hinter der aktuellen GeForce GTX 1050 (Pascal).

Die Rechenkerne der Grafikkarte können per CUDA und OpenCL 1.2 auch für generelle Berechnungen herangezogen werden.

Leistungsaufnahme

Die Leistungsaufnahme der Quadro M2200M entspricht laut Nvidia der alten Quadro M2000M und liegt bei 55 Watt TGP (Max Power Consumption) bzw 39,1 Watt TDP. Dadurch ist die Karte am besten für 15-Zoll-Notebooks geeignet.

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro M1000MNVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M Serie
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro M5500 compare 2048 @ 1.14 - 1.14 GHz256 Bit @ 6606 MHz
Quadro M5000M compare 1536 @ 0.96 - 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M4000M compare 1280 @ 0.98 - 1.01 GHz256 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M3000M compare 1024 @ 1.05 GHz256 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2200 1024 @ 0.69 - 1.04 GHz128 Bit @ 5508 MHz
Quadro M1200 compare 640 @ 0.99 - 1.15 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M2000M compare 640 @ 1.04 - 1.2 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M1000M 512 @ 0.99 - 1.07 GHz128 Bit @ 5000 MHz
Quadro M620 compare 512 @ 1.02 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro 5010M compare 384 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 1300 MHz
Quadro 4000M compare 336 @ 0.48 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro M520 compare 384 @ 0.76 - 1.02 GHz64 Bit
Quadro M600M compare 384 @ 0.84 - 0.88 GHz128 Bit @ 5012 MHz
Quadro M500M compare 384 @ 1.03 - 1.12 GHz64 Bit @ 4004 MHz
Quadro 5000M compare 320 @ 0.41 GHz256 Bit @ 1200 MHz
Quadro 3000M compare 240 @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 625 MHz
Quadro 2000M compare 192 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
Quadro 1000M compare 96 @ 0.7 GHz128 Bit @ 900 MHz
ArchitekturMaxwellMaxwell
Pipelines512 - unified1024 - unified
Kerntakt993 - 1072 (Boost) MHz694 - 1038 (Boost) MHz
Speichertakt5000 MHz5508 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR5GDDR5
Max. Speichergröße4 GB4 GB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 12 (FL 11_0), Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5DirectX 12_1, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.5
Stromverbrauch40 Watt55 Watt
Transistors1.9 Billion4.9 Billion
Herstellungsprozess28 nm28 nm
FeaturesOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, OptimusOptimus, PhysX, 3D Vision Pro, nView, Optimus
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum02.10.2015 13.01.2017
Herstellerseitewww.nvidia.comwww.nvidia.de
CodenameN17P-Q3

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M1000M
1.5 pt (5%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -96%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
1.413 -9%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
1.421 -8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
1.478 -4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
1.479 -4%
AMD Radeon R9 M385X
1.504 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
1.541 0%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
1.543 0%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
1.545 0%
AMD Radeon RX 640
1.545 0%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
1.545
AMD Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
1.61 4%
NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
1.614 4%
NVIDIA GeForce MX250
1.617 5%
AMD Radeon RX 540
1.628 5%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
1.629 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
1.636 6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
1.653 7%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
1.662 8%
AMD FirePro M6100
1.695 10%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 1220%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 2055%
0%
100%
Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy - Quadro M2200
2.6 pt (8%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06404 -98%
...
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
2.24 -13%
AMD Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
2.26 -12%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2.27 -12%
AMD Radeon 740M
2.27 -12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
2.32 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M290X
2.34 -9%
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2.34 -9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
2.45 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
2.5 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro M2200
2.58
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M SLI
2.62 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
2.68 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
2.69 4%
AMD Radeon 760M
2.71 5%
AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
2.8 9%
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
2.8 9%
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
2.89 12%
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.91 13%
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
2.98 16%
...
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
20.4 691%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
33.3 1191%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1845     avg: 1889     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 1920 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1699     avg: 1724     median: 1724 (5%)     max: 1750 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 280203     avg: 289176     median: 289176 (29%)     max: 298148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 15717     avg: 15949     median: 15948.5 (15%)     max: 16180 Points
min: 20388     avg: 21012     median: 20644 (20%)     max: 22003 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 23067     avg: 23422     median: 23422 (6%)     max: 23777 Points
min: 36877     avg: 37505     median: 37796 (9%)     max: 37841 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3302     avg: 3323     median: 3323 (6%)     max: 3344 Points
min: 5232     avg: 5253     median: 5252 (9%)     max: 5275 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3478     avg: 3498     median: 3497.5 (4%)     max: 3517 Points
min: 5786     avg: 5835     median: 5850 (7%)     max: 5869 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 41161     avg: 41908     median: 41907.5 (5%)     max: 42654 Points
min: 127867     avg: 195445     median: 195444 (22%)     max: 263022 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4648     avg: 4661     median: 4660.5 (6%)     max: 4673 Points
min: 7453     avg: 7581     median: 7581 (10%)     max: 7709 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4225     avg: 4230     median: 4229.5 (4%)     max: 4234 Points
min: 7319     avg: 7372     median: 7372 (6%)     max: 7425 Points
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
24622 Points (7%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
24915 Points (14%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
3DMark 06
min: 24393     avg: 24483     median: 24483 (32%)     max: 24573 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 26834     avg: 28150     median: 28149.5 (37%)     max: 29465 Points
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
min: 18.7     avg: 18.8     median: 18.8 (6%)     max: 18.9 fps
min: 23.2     avg: 26.4     median: 27.9 (8%)     max: 28.1 fps
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 DX 11
44.9 fps (15%)
Unigine Heaven 3.0 - Unigine Heaven 3.0 OpenGL
min: 43.4     avg: 43.6     median: 43.6 (19%)     max: 43.8 fps
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
min: 61.3     avg: 62.3     median: 62.3 (12%)     max: 63.2 fps
SPECviewperf 11
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 snx-01
min: 40.87     avg: 40.9     median: 40.9 (24%)     max: 41 fps
specvp11 snx-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.26     avg: 48.9     median: 48.9 (29%)     max: 49.48 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 tcvis-02
min: 40     avg: 41.7     median: 41.7 (24%)     max: 43.34 fps
specvp11 tcvis-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 49.11     avg: 51     median: 51 (29%)     max: 52.9 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 sw-02
min: 46.32     avg: 48.7     median: 48.7 (37%)     max: 51 fps
specvp11 sw-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 42.66     avg: 49.7     median: 49.7 (38%)     max: 56.8 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 proe-05
min: 20.22     avg: 20.6     median: 20.6 (24%)     max: 21 fps
specvp11 proe-05 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 16.23     avg: 19.2     median: 19.2 (23%)     max: 22.18 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 maya-03
min: 56     avg: 56.1     median: 56.1 (42%)     max: 56.2 fps
specvp11 maya-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 56.6     avg: 57.2     median: 57.2 (43%)     max: 57.7 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 lightwave-01
min: 50.9     avg: 52.5     median: 52.5 (56%)     max: 54 fps
specvp11 lightwave-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 47.95     avg: 52.7     median: 52.7 (57%)     max: 57.5 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 ensight-04
min: 39     avg: 39.6     median: 39.6 (19%)     max: 40.12 fps
specvp11 ensight-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 55.7     avg: 57.1     median: 57.1 (27%)     max: 58.5 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 11 - specvp11 catia-03
min: 53.1     avg: 53.6     median: 53.6 (28%)     max: 54 fps
specvp11 catia-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 48.49     avg: 50.6     median: 50.6 (27%)     max: 52.7 fps
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
min: 56.7     avg: 59.4     median: 59.4 (15%)     max: 62 fps
specvp12 sw-03 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 85.3     avg: 90.3     median: 86.2 (21%)     max: 99.5 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
min: 31     avg: 31.1     median: 31.1 (5%)     max: 31.13 fps
specvp12 snx-02 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 57.7     avg: 58.3     median: 58.1 (9%)     max: 59 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
min: 20     avg: 20.4     median: 20.4 (4%)     max: 20.72 fps
specvp12 showcase-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 31.14     avg: 32.2     median: 32.8 (7%)     max: 32.8 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
min: 12     avg: 12     median: 12 (3%)     max: 12.06 fps
specvp12 mediacal-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 20.34     avg: 23.6     median: 24.6 (6%)     max: 25.66 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
min: 30     avg: 30.6     median: 30.6 (8%)     max: 31.27 fps
specvp12 maya-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 46.93     avg: 47.4     median: 46.9 (13%)     max: 48.34 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
min: 0.69     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (2%)     max: 2.72 fps
specvp12 energy-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 4.28     avg: 4.9     median: 5.2 (5%)     max: 5.26 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
min: 33.8     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (14%)     max: 34 fps
specvp12 creo-01 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 68.2     avg: 69.3     median: 68.5 (27%)     max: 71.2 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
min: 37     avg: 37.5     median: 37.4 (6%)     max: 37.89 fps
specvp12 catia-04 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 71.4     avg: 72.2     median: 72 (12%)     max: 73.2 fps
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 6833     avg: 6839     median: 6839 (5%)     max: 6845 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
6833 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 81.5     avg: 83.7     median: 83.7 (28%)     max: 85.9 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
88.6 fps (29%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 93.7     avg: 95.9     median: 95.9 (6%)     max: 98.1 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
min: 102.9     avg: 107.4     median: 103.9 (6%)     max: 115.5 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
99.6 % (100%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
110.7 fps (12%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
163.7 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
219.1 fps (13%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
432 fps (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 534     avg: 682     median: 682 (2%)     max: 830 Samples/s
min: 1204     avg: 1276     median: 1306 (5%)     max: 1318 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 889     avg: 1180     median: 1179.5 (2%)     max: 1470 Samples/s
min: 2086     avg: 2097     median: 2099 (4%)     max: 2107 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2676 Points (3%)
4332 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
68.5 Watt (10%)
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
89.2 Watt (12%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
87.7 Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise + NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
39.5 dB(A) (63%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M1000M → 100% n=32

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 158% n=32

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Ghost Recon Wildlands

Ghost Recon Wildlands

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
83.4  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.1  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33.7  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
17.6  fps
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
78  fps
med. 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
52.3 54.8 ~ 54 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
50.5 51.9 ~ 51 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
36.2 37.5 ~ 37 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
14.6  fps
Battlefield 1

Battlefield 1

2016
low 1280x720
Quadro M2200:
139.4  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
105.3  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.1  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
42  fps
Rise of the Tomb Raider

Rise of the Tomb Raider

2016
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
123 128.7 ~ 126 fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
68.5 71.6 72.8 ~ 71 fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
37.4 40.7 41.6 ~ 40 fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
33 34.4 35.2 ~ 34 fps
4K 3840x2160
Quadro M2200:
13.7  fps
Rainbow Six Siege

Rainbow Six Siege

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
137.8  fps
155%
Quadro M2200:
214.2  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
79.9  fps
164%
Quadro M2200:
131.2  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
43.5  fps
162%
Quadro M2200:
70.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
32  fps
164%
Quadro M2200:
52.4  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1000M:
13.2  fps
Star Wars Battlefront

Star Wars Battlefront

2015
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
148.8  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
119  fps
high 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
56.4  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
48.2  fps
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
121  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
65  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
30  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
14  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1000M:
12  fps
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
54 59.4 ~ 57 fps
195%
Quadro M2200:
104.6 116.6 ~ 111 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
36.5 38 ~ 37 fps
178%
Quadro M2200:
63.4 66.6 68.4 ~ 66 fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
17 20.8 ~ 19 fps
184%
Quadro M2200:
30.3 37.2 37.8 ~ 35 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
10.8 11 ~ 11 fps
173%
Quadro M2200:
18 20 20.3 ~ 19 fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1000M:
7 7.7 ~ 7 fps
181%
Quadro M2200:
12.7  fps
Dirt Rally

Dirt Rally

2015
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
261  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
115  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
62  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
29  fps
4K 3840x2160
100%
Quadro M1000M:
20  fps
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
133  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
128  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
123  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
84  fps
Ryse: Son of Rome

Ryse: Son of Rome

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
76  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
52  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
23  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
21  fps
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor

Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor

2014
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1000M:
169  fps
med. 1344x756
100%
Quadro M1000M:
131  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
34  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
26  fps
GRID: Autosport

GRID: Autosport

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
248  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
143  fps
high 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
82  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
43  fps
Thief

Thief

2014
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
78  fps
139%
Quadro M2200:
108.8  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
53  fps
167%
Quadro M2200:
88.6  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
45  fps
166%
Quadro M2200:
74.8  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
23  fps
172%
Quadro M2200:
39.6  fps
Battlefield 4

Battlefield 4

2013
low 1024x768
Quadro M2200:
171.5  fps
med. 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
148.3  fps
high 1366x768
Quadro M2200:
115.9  fps
ultra 1920x1080
Quadro M2200:
47.8  fps
Total War: Rome II

Total War: Rome II

2013
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
166  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
126  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
107  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
20  fps
Company of Heroes 2

Company of Heroes 2

2013
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
54  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
48  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
34  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
12  fps
GRID 2

GRID 2

2013
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
195  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
153  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
136  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
43  fps
Metro: Last Light

Metro: Last Light

2013
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
83  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
49  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
25  fps
BioShock Infinite

BioShock Infinite

2013
low 1280x720
100%
Quadro M1000M:
176.7 195 ~ 186 fps
134%
Quadro M2200:
229.4 270.9 ~ 250 fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
111 115 ~ 113 fps
156%
Quadro M2200:
174.1 177.2 ~ 176 fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
100 100.1 ~ 100 fps
152%
Quadro M2200:
149.1 155.5 ~ 152 fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
37 38 ~ 38 fps
153%
Quadro M2200:
56.8 58.6 ~ 58 fps
Tomb Raider

Tomb Raider

2013
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
279  fps
137%
Quadro M2200:
381.4  fps
med. 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
144  fps
166%
Quadro M2200:
238.8  fps
high 1366x768
100%
Quadro M1000M:
98  fps
152%
Quadro M2200:
149.3  fps
ultra 1920x1080
100%
Quadro M1000M:
43  fps
163%
Quadro M2200:
70.2  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M1000M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro M2200 → 163%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 170%

NVIDIA Quadro M2200lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Ghost Recon Wildlands83.437.133.717.6
For Honor7854513714.6
Battlefield 1139.4105.347.142
Rise of the Tomb Raider12671403413.7
Rainbow Six Siege214.2131.270.452.4
Star Wars Battlefront148.811956.448.2
The Witcher 311166351912.7
Thief108.888.674.839.6
Battlefield 4171.5148.3115.947.8
BioShock Infinite25017615258
Tomb Raider381.4238.8149.370.2
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

4
7
2
5
4
6
3
2		2
8
1



3


NVIDIA Quadro M1000Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Rainbow Six Siege137.879.943.53213.2
Anno 220512165301412
The Witcher 3573719117
Dirt Rally261115622920
F1 201413312812384
Ryse: Son of Rome76522321
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor1691313426
GRID: Autosport2481438243
Thief78534523
Total War: Rome II16612610720
Company of Heroes 254483412
GRID 219515313643
Metro: Last Light834925
BioShock Infinite18611310038
Tomb Raider2791449843
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
2
10
4
5
6		2
6
5
2		9
5
1



4


Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 03:20:16

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6509 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7706 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731464416s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:17:12 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.029s ... 0.029s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.03s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.03s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6509 +0.023s ... 0.052s

#9 got single benchmarks 6509 +0.006s ... 0.059s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 7706 +0.004s ... 0.062s

#11 got single benchmarks 7706 +0.007s ... 0.069s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.069s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.035s ... 0.103s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.103s

#15 Got 140 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.113s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.113s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.114s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.007s ... 0.121s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.121s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.123s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)