Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

► remove from comparison

Highend Workstation Grafikchip mit DirectX 10 Unterstützung wahrscheinlich auf 8700M GT basierend.

Gedacht für Digital Content Creators, Ingenieure, Geowissenschaftler und andere professionelle 3D Anwendungen.

Zertifizierte Treiber garantieren die fehlerfreie und schnellere (im Vergleich zu 8700M) Darstellung von professionellen Programmen (CAD, CCD, Visualisierungssoftware).

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

► remove from comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

Professionelle Grafikkarte mit zertifizierten Treiber besonders für OpenGL geeignet. Technisch ähnlich wie die Quadro FX 1600M (8700M) basiert die FX 1700M auf den 96x0M Kern (G96), jedoch mit höheren Taktraten. Im Vergleich zur 1600M wird bereits Powermizer 8.0 unterstützt.

Gedacht für Digital Content Creators, Ingenieure, Geowissenschaftler und andere professionelle 3D Anwendungen.

Zertifizierte Treiber garantieren die fehlerfreie und schnellere (im Vergleich zu 8700M) Darstellung von professionellen Programmen (CAD, CCD, Visualisierungssoftware).

show full text
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600MNVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
Quadro FX Serie
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
Quadro FX 3800M compare 128 @ 0.68 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3700M compare 128 @ 0.55 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 2800M compare 96 @ 0.6 GHz256 Bit @ 1000 MHz
Quadro FX 3600M compare 96 @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1800M compare 72 @ 0.56 GHz128 Bit @ 1100 MHz
Quadro FX 2700M compare 48 @ 0.53 GHz256 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 880M compare 48 @ 0.55 GHz128 Bit @ 790 MHz
Quadro FX 3500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.58 GHz256 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 2500M compare 24/8 cores @ 0.5 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 1700M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1600M 32 @ 0.63 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 1500M compare 20/7 cores @ 0.38 GHz256 Bit @ 500 MHz
Quadro FX 770M compare 32 @ 0.5 GHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 570M compare 32 @ 0.48 GHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 380M compare 16 @ 0.63 GHz64 Bit @ 800 MHz
Quadro FX 370M compare 8 @ 0.58 GHz64 Bit @ 700 MHz
Quadro FX 360M compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 600 MHz
Quadro FX 350M compare 4/3 cores @ 0.45 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
CodenameNB8P-GLMNB9P-GLM
ArchitekturG8xG9x
Pipelines32 - unified32 - unified
Kerntakt625 MHz625 MHz
Shadertakt1250 MHz1250 MHz
Speichertakt800 MHz800 MHz
Speicherbandbreite128 Bit128 Bit
SpeichertypGDDR3GDDR3
Max. Speichergröße512 MB256 MB
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10, Shader 4.0
Stromverbrauch50 Watt50 Watt
Transistors289 Million289 Million
Herstellungsprozess80 nm65 nm
FeaturesOpenGL 2.1, PureVideo HD, Powermizer 7.0, mögliche Schnittstellen: LVDS, DVI, VGA, HDTV, HDCP, HDMIOpenGL 2.1, PureVideo HD, Powermizer 8.0, mögliche Schnittstellen: LVDS, DVI, VGA, HDTV, HDCP, HDMI
Notebookgrößegroß (17" z.B.)groß (17" z.B.)
Erscheinungsdatum01.06.2007 01.10.2008
InformationenCG Shading Hochsprache, 32 Bit Gleitkommapräzision, 12 Bit Subpixel Präzision, 128 Bit Genauigkeit der Grafikpipeline, Vertex und Pixelshader Programmierbarkeit, PCI-E Interface, FSAA mit gedrehtem Raster, nView Multidisplay Support, High-Precision Dynamic-Range (HPDR) Technologie, Hardware 3D Clipping nach Fensterkennung, Vollbild AntialiasingCG Shading Hochsprache, 32 Bit Gleitkommapräzision, 12 Bit Subpixel Präzision, 128 Bit Genauigkeit der Grafikpipeline, Vertex und Pixelshader Programmierbarkeit, PCI-E Interface, FSAA mit gedrehtem Raster, nView Multidisplay Support, High-Precision Dynamic-Range (HPDR) Technologie, Hardware 3D Clipping nach Fensterkennung, Vollbild Antialiasing
Herstellerseitewww.nvidia.dewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
min: 27822     avg: 32843     median: 35198 (37%)     max: 35509 Points
35734 Points (37%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 15060     avg: 16009     median: 15915 (8%)     max: 17144 Points
18212 Points (10%)
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
min: 9344     avg: 9963     median: 9873 (11%)     max: 10375 Points
11550 Points (13%)
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
3DMark 06
min: 4535     avg: 4623     median: 4622.5 (6%)     max: 4710 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
3DMark 06
min: 4798     avg: 4916     median: 4915.5 (6%)     max: 5033 Points
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
3DMark 06
5608 Points (7%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
6302 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 3899     avg: 4670     median: 4885 (3%)     max: 5226 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M
6159 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 114% n=5

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
83.2 84.2 ~ 84 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
31.5 33.3 ~ 32 fps
104%
Quadro FX 1700M:
33.3  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.6 14.4 15.9 ~ 15 fps
127%
Quadro FX 1700M:
19.1  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
12.7 72.2 73.1 ~ 53 fps
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
23.5 29.6 ~ 27 fps
109%
Quadro FX 1700M:
29.3  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
13.2 15.6 ~ 14 fps
122%
Quadro FX 1700M:
17.1  fps
World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
36 37 ~ 37 fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
21 23 ~ 22 fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
444 476 493 ~ 471 fps
80%
Quadro FX 1700M:
378  fps
med. 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
153 162 167 ~ 161 fps
94%
Quadro FX 1700M:
152  fps
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
56 56 59 ~ 57 fps
104%
Quadro FX 1700M:
59  fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.8 173.6 ~ 167 fps
med. 640x480
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
164.3 174 ~ 169 fps
high 800x600
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
160.6 165 ~ 163 fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
129.1 129.2 ~ 129 fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
Quadro FX 1600M:
549  fps
111%
Quadro FX 1700M:
610  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M → 106%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 104%

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark843215
Crysis - CPU Benchmark532714
World in Conflict - Benchmark3722
F.E.A.R.47116157
Doom 3167169163129
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo549
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1
2		1
2

2		3
1

2


1





NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700Mlowmed.highultraQHD4K
Crysis - GPU Benchmark33.3119.06
Crysis - CPU Benchmark29.317.07
F.E.A.R.37815259
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo610
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


1		1
1

1		2
1

1








Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 13. 01:28:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 183 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1087 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731457698s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 10 Nov 2024 05:17:12 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.002s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.003s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 183 +0.021s ... 0.023s

#9 got single benchmarks 183 +0.005s ... 0.028s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 1087 +0s ... 0.029s

#11 got single benchmarks 1087 +0.003s ... 0.032s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.032s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.036s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.036s

#15 Got 44 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.039s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.039s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.04s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.044s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.044s

#20 return log +0.002s ... 0.046s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)