Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR GE8300 vs PowerVR GE8320

PowerVR GE8300

► remove from comparison

Die PowerVR GE8300 von Imagination Technologies ist eine Mittelklasse-Grafikkarte für Smartphones und Tablets (ARM basierend, meistens mit Android). Unterstützt OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2 und Android NN HAL API Support

PowerVR GE8320

► remove from comparison

Die PowerVR GE8320 von Imagination Technologies ist eine Mittelklasse-Grafikkarte für Smartphones und Tablets (ARM basierend, meistens mit Android). Unterstützt OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2 und Android NN HAL API Support

PowerVR GE8300PowerVR GE8320
PowerVR Series8XE Serie
PowerVR GE8320 @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 compare @ 0.57 GHz
PowerVR GE8320 @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 compare @ 0.57 GHz
ArchitekturPowerVR Series8XEPowerVR Series8XE
Kerntakt660 MHz400 - 650 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0
Herstellungsprozess20 nm20 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API SupportOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API Support
Erscheinungsdatum09.09.2014 09.09.2014
Herstellerseitewww.imgtec.comwww.imgtec.com
CPU in PowerVR GE8300GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC Tiger T3104 x 1800 MHz? MHz800 MHz
Mediatek Helio A22 MT67614 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT8766B4 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D4 x 1800 MHz? MHz550 MHz
min. - max.? MHz550 - 800 MHz
CPU in PowerVR GE8320GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek Helio G378 x 1800 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek Helio G358 x 2300 MHz? MHz680 MHz
Mediatek Helio G368 x 2200 MHz? MHz680 MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 800 MHz

Benchmarks

min: 6785     avg: 11520     median: 11994 (1%)     max: 13939 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
4908 Points (1%)
min: 6867     avg: 7128     median: 7128 (1%)     max: 7389 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
9534 Points (1%)
min: 494     avg: 806     median: 812 (4%)     max: 1214 Points
min: 445     avg: 750     median: 765 (2%)     max: 881 Points
min: 302     avg: 499.1     median: 493 (2%)     max: 1166 Points
min: 253     avg: 424.8     median: 429 (1%)     max: 516 Points
min: 244     avg: 709     median: 732 (7%)     max: 2061 Points
min: 205     avg: 625     median: 659 (4%)     max: 801 Points
min: 178     avg: 402     median: 421 (2%)     max: 512 Points
min: 145     avg: 343.2     median: 363 (1%)     max: 441 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.38     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.48 fps
min: 0.85     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (0%)     max: 1.6 fps
min: 2.3     avg: 3.9     median: 3.9 (0%)     max: 7.4 fps
min: 1.8     avg: 3     median: 2.9 (0%)     max: 6.1 fps
min: 3.7     avg: 6.7     median: 6.7 (0%)     max: 8.4 fps
min: 6.3     avg: 10.4     median: 11 (1%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8300
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8320
min: 13     avg: 20     median: 20 (0%)     max: 23 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 9927     avg: 11148     median: 11148 (1%)     max: 12369 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
7.5 fps (0%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
0 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2563     avg: 7985     median: 3272 (1%)     max: 27482 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 536     avg: 910     median: 678 (1%)     max: 1991 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.14     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 3.33 Watt

Average Benchmarks PowerVR GE8300 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks PowerVR GE8320 → 173% n=21

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
44  fps
95%
PowerVR GE8320:
42  fps
high
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
ultra
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
39  fps
123%
PowerVR GE8320:
48  fps
high
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
ultra
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
PowerVR GE8320:
15  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
30  fps
97%
PowerVR GE8320:
24 30 33.5 ~ 29 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
21 25 26 ~ 24 fps
104%
PowerVR GE8320:
22 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 25 fps
med.
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
16 25 26 ~ 22 fps
109%
PowerVR GE8320:
22 23 24 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~ 24 fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
0 (!) 24 ~ 12 fps
0%
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!) 0 (!) ~ 0 fps
ultra
PowerVR GE8320:
0 (!)  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
32 53 59 ~ 48 fps
77%
PowerVR GE8320:
30 31 31 56 ~ 37 fps
ultra
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
31 50 52 ~ 44 fps
75%
PowerVR GE8320:
29 30 31 43 ~ 33 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
38  fps
139%
PowerVR GE8320:
47 58 ~ 53 fps
high
PowerVR GE8320:
57  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
30  fps
100%
PowerVR GE8320:
30  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
17 29 ~ 23 fps
122%
PowerVR GE8320:
28  fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
23  fps
113%
PowerVR GE8320:
21 30 ~ 26 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
7 8.5 9 9.5 28 ~ 12 fps
175%
PowerVR GE8320:
10 19 27 28 ~ 21 fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
8 9 14 ~ 10 fps
190%
PowerVR GE8320:
12 22 24 ~ 19 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
PowerVR GE8320:
24 24 26 ~ 25 fps
Temple Run 2

Temple Run 2

2013
high
PowerVR GE8320:
44.5 59 ~ 52 fps

Average Gaming PowerVR GE8300 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming PowerVR GE8320 → 109%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

PowerVR GE8300lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift44
Call of Duty Mobile39
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile242212
Arena of Valor4844
Shadow Fight 338
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne2323
Asphalt 9: Legends1210
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
3
4

1


3
2


1







PowerVR GE8320lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift42
Call of Duty Mobile48
Genshin Impact15
Armajet29
PUBG Mobile25240
Arena of Valor3733
Shadow Fight 35357
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne2826
Asphalt 9: Legends2119
Real Racing 325
Temple Run 252
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
4
4

1


4
3


1







Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 03. 19:30:55

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9838 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9411 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1733250655s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 01 Dec 2024 05:19:16 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.014s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9838 +0.015s ... 0.029s

#9 got single benchmarks 9838 +0.019s ... 0.049s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9411 +0s ... 0.049s

#11 got single benchmarks 9411 +0.055s ... 0.104s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.104s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.013s ... 0.117s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.117s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.008s ... 0.126s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.126s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.129s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.129s

#19 Got 92 rows for game benchmarks. +0.013s ... 0.142s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.142s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.143s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.147s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.147s

#24 return log +0.001s ... 0.148s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)