Notebookcheck Logo

PowerVR GE8300 vs PowerVR GE8100

PowerVR GE8300

► remove from comparison

Die PowerVR GE8300 von Imagination Technologies ist eine Mittelklasse-Grafikkarte für Smartphones und Tablets (ARM basierend, meistens mit Android). Unterstützt OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2 und Android NN HAL API Support

PowerVR GE8100

► remove from comparison

Die PowerVR GE8100 von Imagination Technologies ist eine Einstiegsgrafikkarte für Smartphones und Tablets (ARM basierend, meistens mit Android). Sie ist die langsamste Variante der Series8XE Serie (GE8xx0) mit einer Peak Fillrate von nur einem Pixel/Takt.

Unterstützt OpenGL ES 3.2 und Vulkan 1.0.

show full text
PowerVR GE8300PowerVR GE8100
PowerVR Series8XE Serie
PowerVR GE8320 compare @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 @ 0.57 GHz
PowerVR GE8320 compare @ 0.4 - 0.65 GHz
PowerVR GE8300 @ 0.66 GHz
PowerVR GE8100 @ 0.57 GHz
ArchitekturPowerVR Series8XEPowerVR Series8XE
Kerntakt660 MHz570 MHz
Shared Memoryneinnein
APIDirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 10, OpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0
Herstellungsprozess20 nm20 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan 1.1, OpenCL 1.2, Android NN HAL API SupportOpenGL 3.x, 4.x, OpenGL ES 3.0
Erscheinungsdatum09.09.2014 09.09.2014
Herstellerseitewww.imgtec.comwww.imgtec.com
CPU in PowerVR GE8300GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
UNISOC Tiger T3104 x 1800 MHz? MHz800 MHz
Mediatek Helio A22 MT67614 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek MT8766B4 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Mediatek Helio A20 MT6761D4 x 1800 MHz? MHz550 MHz
min. - max.? MHz550 - 800 MHz
CPU in PowerVR GE8100GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Mediatek MT67394 x 1500 MHz? MHz570 MHz
Mediatek MT6739WW4 x 1500 MHz? MHz570 MHz
min. - max.? MHz550 - 800 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 6349     avg: 7555     median: 7567 (1%)     max: 8643 Points
min: 2878     avg: 3409     median: 3583.5 (0%)     max: 4346 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
4908 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 442     avg: 525     median: 509 (2%)     max: 763 Points
min: 159     avg: 193     median: 196 (1%)     max: 225 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 390     avg: 469.6     median: 458 (1%)     max: 712 Points
min: 131     avg: 161.8     median: 165 (0%)     max: 189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 238     avg: 306.5     median: 299 (1%)     max: 509 Points
min: 93     avg: 120.5     median: 122 (1%)     max: 225 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 197     avg: 258.1     median: 253 (1%)     max: 443 Points
min: 75     avg: 98.3     median: 99 (0%)     max: 189 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0)
min: 411     avg: 472.7     median: 463 (4%)     max: 712 Points
min: 120     avg: 157.7     median: 154 (1%)     max: 211 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Graphics
min: 357     avg: 417.5     median: 414 (2%)     max: 618 Points
min: 102     avg: 131.8     median: 127 (1%)     max: 185 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
min: 239     avg: 273.2     median: 266 (1%)     max: 406 Points
min: 80     avg: 105.2     median: 104.5 (1%)     max: 221 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
min: 197     avg: 243.9     median: 222.5 (1%)     max: 508 Points
min: 65     avg: 85.5     median: 84.5 (0%)     max: 185 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.38     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.48 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 0.7     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 1.4 fps
min: 0.21     avg: 0.3     median: 0.4 (0%)     max: 0.4 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 1.9     avg: 2.6     median: 2.3 (0%)     max: 4.2 fps
min: 0.6     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 0.95 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 1.8     avg: 2.1     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2.9 fps
min: 0.6     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (0%)     max: 0.91 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 2.5     avg: 4.4     median: 4.3 (0%)     max: 6.2 fps
min: 1.3     avg: 1.5     median: 1.6 (0%)     max: 1.7 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 5.9     avg: 6.9     median: 6.6 (0%)     max: 9.2 fps
min: 2.2     avg: 2.6     median: 2.7 (0%)     max: 2.8 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8300
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 13     avg: 14.6     median: 14 (0%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + PowerVR GE8100
min: 4.9     avg: 5.7     median: 6 (0%)     max: 6.1 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 9927     avg: 11148     median: 11148 (1%)     max: 12369 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
7.5 fps (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2563     avg: 7985     median: 3272 (1%)     max: 27482 Points
1768 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 536     avg: 910     median: 678 (1%)     max: 1991 Points
217 Points (0%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 3.14     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (1%)     max: 3.33 Watt

Average Benchmarks PowerVR GE8300 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks PowerVR GE8100 → 40% n=17

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Spiele-Benchmarks

Die folgenden Benchmarks basieren auf unseren Spieletests mit Testnotebooks. Die Performance dieser Grafikkarte bei den gelisteten Spielen ist abhängig von der verwendeten CPU, Speicherausstattung, Treiber und auch Betriebssystem. Dadurch müssen die untenstehenden Werte nicht repräsentativ sein. Detaillierte Informationen über das verwendete System sehen Sie nach einem Klick auf den fps-Wert.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
44  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
39  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
30  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
21 25 26 ~ 24 fps
med.
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
16 25 26 ~ 22 fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
0 (!) 24 ~ 12 fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
32 53 59 ~ 48 fps
ultra
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
31 50 52 ~ 44 fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
38  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
30  fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
17 29 ~ 23 fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
23  fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
7 8.5 9 9.5 28 ~ 12 fps
high
100%
PowerVR GE8300:
8 9 14 ~ 10 fps

Average Gaming PowerVR GE8300 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

PowerVR GE8300lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift44
Call of Duty Mobile39
Armajet30
PUBG Mobile242212
Arena of Valor4844
Shadow Fight 338
Dead Trigger 230
Asphalt 8: Airborne2323
Asphalt 9: Legends1210
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		3
4

1


3
2


1







Eine Liste mit weiteren Spielen und allen Grafikkarten finden Sie auf unserer Seite: Welches Spiel ist mit welcher Grafikkarte spielbar?

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 25. 03:13:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9838 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 8788 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1735092800s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 22 Dec 2024 05:19:32 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.014s ... 0.015s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.015s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9838 +0.014s ... 0.028s

#9 got single benchmarks 9838 +0.019s ... 0.048s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8788 +0s ... 0.048s

#11 got single benchmarks 8788 +0.016s ... 0.064s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.064s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.08s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.08s

#15 Got 30 rows for game benchmarks. +0.005s ... 0.085s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.085s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.086s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.09s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.09s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.09s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Grafikkarten Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)