Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Pentium Silver J5040 vs Intel Celeron N5095A

Intel Pentium Silver J5040

Intel Pentium J5040

Der Intel Pentium Silver J5040 ist ein Ende 2019 vorgestellter Quad-Core-SoC, der hauptsächlich in preiswerten Mini-PCs verbaut wird. Er taktet mit 2 bis 3,2 GHz (Einzelkern Burst) und gehört der Gemini-Lake-Plattform an (2019 Refresh). Die Fertigung erfolgt wie beim Vorgänger Apollo Lake in einem 14-Nanometer-Prozesses mit FinFETs. Neben den vier CPU-Kernen integriert der Chip auch eine DirectX-12-fähige Grafikeinheit sowie einen DDR4/LPDDR4-Speichercontroller (Dual-Channel, 2.400 MHz). Der SoC kann nicht ausgetauscht werden, da er direkt mit dem Mainboard verlötet wird (BGA Package).

Im Vergleich zum Vorgänger wurde der Burst-Takt deutlich erhöht. Weiterhin integriert der Chip teilweise WLAN und kann per Wireless-AC9560 mit Companion Module platzsparend mit WLAN ausgestattet werden.

Durch die höhere Taktrate und den höheren TDP ist der Pentium Silver J5040 etwas schneller als die mobile Variante Pentium Silver N5030. Im Vergleich mit AMD, kann sich der J5040 knapp gegen den Zen basierten Dual Core Athlon Silver 3050e (schneller in Single-Thread, etwas langsamer bei Multi-Thread Tests). Ein Intel Core i3 aus 2019 (wie der i3-1005G1) ist in allen Tests deutlich schneller.

Architektur

Die Prozessor-Architektur der Gemini Lake SoCs wurde im Vergleich zum Vorgänger leicht weiterentwickelt. Intel nennt sie nun Goldmont Plus Kerne und verdoppelt den Level 2 Cache von 2 auf 4 MB. Trotzdem sollte die Pro-MHz-Leistung noch deutlich hinter den aktuellen Kaby-Lake Prozessoren bleiben. Beim Gemini-Lake-Refresh wurde hier nichts geändert.

Grafik

Die integrierte UHD Graphics 605 unterscheidet sich nur durch die verbesserten Displayanschlüsse von der HD Graphics 505.

Weiterhin integriert der Chip eine fortschrittliche Videoeinheit, die auch die hardwarebeschleunigte Wiedergabe von VP9- und H.265-Material (8 Bit Farbtiefe) beherrscht.

Leistungsaufnahme

Der gesamte SoC wird von Intel wie der Vorgänger mit einer TDP von 10 Watt spezifiziert und damit etwas höher also die mobile Variante Pentium N5030.

Intel Celeron N5095A

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron N5095A

The Celeron N5095A is an inexpensive quad-core SoC of the Jasper Lake product family designed for use in affordable SFF desktops and laptops. It features four Tremont CPU cores running at 2 GHz that Boost to up to 2.9 GHz with no thread-doubling Hyper-Threading technology in sight. A pretty basic iGPU is present as well.

The only difference between the N5095A and the N5095 is that the former comes with support for more proprietary Intel technologies such as the Smart Sound DSP, Wake on Voice and HD Audio.

Architecture and Features

Tremont brings many improvements over Goldmont Plus, the architecture that we know from the N5030 and myriads of other N-class CPUs. An up to 30% boost in single-thread performance is to be expected thanks to smarter prefetchers, branch prediction improvements and other refinements, according to Intel. These new chips are physically larger than their immediate predecessors as a result. Either way, this is still a "small" core rather than a "big" one according to ChipsAndCheese.

The Celeron has 1.5 MB of L2 and 4 MB of L3 cache and is compatible with DDR4-2933 and LPDDR4x-2933 memory or slower. Support for Intel CNVi Wi-Fi 6 modules is baked into the chip, as are 8 PCIe 3.0 lanes for NVMe SSD speeds up to 3.9 GB/s. USB 4 or Thunderbolt aren't supported however.

Please also note that the Celeron gets soldered to the motherboard (BGA1338 socket interface) for good and is thus not user-replaceable.

Performance

While we haven't tested a single system featuring the N5095A as of Sep 2024, we have done several reviews of computers/laptops powered by the N5095. CPU performance should be pretty much identical between the two. Therefore, we fully expect the chip to be about as fast as the Core i3-10110U, Core i3-1005G1, Celeron N5105 and also the Ryzen 3 3200U in multi-threaded workloads. Which is just enough for the most basic of tasks in late 2024.

Performance will get a significant hit if the power target is set to 10 W or 6 W instead of the Intel-recommended 15 W value.

Graphics

The DirectX 12.1-capable 16 EU UHD Graphics runs at up to 750 MHz and is in many respects similar to what Ice Lake CPUs come equipped with. This graphics adapter is capable of driving up to 3 SUHD displays simultaneously; HEVC, AVC, VP9, MPEG-2 and other popular video codecs can all be hardware-decoded. AV1 and VVC can't.

As far as gaming is concerned, it is reasonable to expect playable framerates in really old games (like Dota 2 Reborn) provided one sticks to lower resolutions such as HD 720p.

Power consumption

While most N-class chips have a 6 W long-term power target, the Celeron N5095A has a 15 W TDP to mimic much faster U-class Core processors. This isn't a great CPU for passively cooled designs.

The N5095A is built with the same 10 nm Intel process as Ice Lake-U processors for pretty unimpressive power efficiency, as of late 2024.

ModelIntel Pentium Silver J5040Intel Celeron N5095A
CodenameGemini Lake RefreshJasper Lake
SeriesIntel Gemini LakeIntel Jasper Lake
Serie: Jasper Lake Jasper Lake
Intel Pentium Silver J5040 « 2 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 compare1.1 - 3.1 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4125 compare2 - 2.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N4120 compare1.1 - 2.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron J4025 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N4020 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 compare2 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Silver N6000 compare1.1 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095A « 2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5095 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5105 compare2 - 2.9 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N5100 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4505 compare2 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron N4500 compare1.1 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Clock2000 - 3200 MHz2000 - 2900 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB1.5 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
4 x 2.9 GHz Intel Tremont
TDP10 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm10 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFCBGA1090BGA1338
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 605 (18 EUs, 200 - 750 MHz), Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR4/LPDDR4-2400DDR4-2933/LPDDR4x-2933 RAM, PCIe 3, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 605 (250 - 800 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU) (450 - 750 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
1634 Points (2%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
519 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
202 Points (22%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
630 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
279 Points (2%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
91 Points (26%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3.5 Points (5%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1.1 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2688 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
8279 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
13248 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
4422 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
516 s (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
15.3 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1391 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
8946 MIPS (5%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
2833 MIPS (33%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
19.2 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
89.1 fps (21%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
1.7 fps (3%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.3 GB/s (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2 GB/s (5%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
2060 Seconds (15%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.3 sec (29%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
4296 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
21.3 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
47.8 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1083 s (5%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
538 Points (21%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
1672 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
535 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1664 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2333 Points (23%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6359 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
1957 ms (2%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
80.2 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
108.2 Points (20%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
426 Points (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Pentium Silver J5040 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 09. 17:49:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14651 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 17993 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1736441346s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Jan 2025 05:19:20 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.008s ... 0.008s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14651 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#8 got single benchmarks 14651 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 17993 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 17993 +0s ... 0.014s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.014s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.019s ... 0.032s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.035s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)