Notebookcheck Logo

Marvell PXA986 vs MediaTek MT8161 vs WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

Marvell PXA986

► remove from comparison Marvell Technology Group PXA986

Der Marvell PXA986 ist ein ARM basierter Dual-Core SoC für Smartphones und Tablets. Er bietet zwei Cortex-A9 Kerne mit meist 1.2 GHz Takt, eine Vivante GC1000 Grafikkarte, einen Video-Prozessor für 720p30 Wiedergabe von H.263, H.264 BP und MPEG4- SP und ein WCDMA+HSDPA Modem.

MediaTek MT8161

► remove from comparison

Der MediaTek MT8161 ist ein ARM basierender SoC für (Android) Tablets. Er bietet vier ARM Cortex-A53 Prozessorkerne mit bis zu 1.3 GHz, eine ARM Mali-T720 Grafikkarte und einen LPDDR3 Speicherkontroller (z.B. mit 1 GB im Lenovo Tab 2 A8-50). An drahtlosen Schnittstellen bietet der SoC Bluetooth 4.0 und Dual Band 802.11 b/g/n WLAN.

Die vier 64 Bit Cortex-A53 Kerne positionieren den SoC im Einstiegs-Mittelklasse Bereich in 2015.

WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950

► remove from comparison WM8950

Der VIA WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 ist ein günstiger Einsteiger-SoC für Tablets und Smartphones. Er ist hauptsächlich für Android 4.x und Windows CE gedacht und bietet folgende Komponenten: 

  • Einzelkern Cortex-A9 Prozessor mit 1GHz Taktrate
  • ARM Mali 400(MP2?) Grafikkarte
  • Multi-Standard 1080p Video Decoding, H.264 Video Encoding
  • DDR3/LPDDR2 Speicherkontroller
  • Hardware Security Engine

show full text
ModelMarvell PXA986MediaTek MT8161WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950
SeriesMarvell Technology Group Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A9Cortex-A53Cortex-A9
Serie: Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA986 « 1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM89501 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
JLQ JR5101.5 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9352.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6592.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6582.35 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6552.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6502 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 9302 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 6201.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/A 1.5 GHz1.5 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8163 V/B 1.3 GHz1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MT8161 « 1.3 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Marvell Armada PXA19081.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113T2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A53
MediaTek MTK 8113L1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A53
HiSilicon Kirin 910T1.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Rockchip RK31881.8 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
HiSilicon Kirin 9101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A9
Renesas MP52321.5 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Broadcom BCM21664T1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
Marvell PXA9861.2 GHz2 / 2 cores Cortex-A9
NXP i.MX 6SLL1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 « 1 GHz1 / 1 cores Cortex-A9
Clock1200 MHz1300 MHz1000 MHz
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 41 / 1
Technology45 nm28 nm
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.marvell.comwww.wondermedia.com.tw
FeaturesLP-DDR3 memory controller, 1080p video encode, 1080p video decode, embedded GPS / GLONASS / BeiDou module, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio support, ARM Jazelle, ARM TrustZone
iGPUARM Mali-T720 MP2ARM Mali-400 MP

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 2623     avg: 2874     median: 2740 (2%)     max: 3258 Points
317%
1 MT8161 +
8693 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 2709     avg: 2985     median: 2985 (2%)     max: 3261 Points
281%
1 MT8161 +
8398 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 PXA986 +
3675 Points (3%)
261%
1 MT8161 +
9598 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 631     avg: 647     median: 646.5 (1%)     max: 662 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 376     avg: 379.5     median: 379.5 (7%)     max: 383 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8161 +
1838 Points (3%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8161 +
616 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 437     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (4%)     max: 442 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1337     avg: 1448     median: 1448 (13%)     max: 1559 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1275     avg: 1284     median: 1284 (3%)     max: 1293 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 709     avg: 720     median: 720 (1%)     max: 731 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1005     avg: 1035     median: 1034.5 (3%)     max: 1064 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 73.7     avg: 74.3     median: 74 (3%)     max: 75.3 MFLOPS
42%
1 WM8950 +
30.8 MFLOPS (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 39.83     avg: 41.6     median: 41.4 (4%)     max: 43.69 MFLOPS
91%
1 WM8950 +
37.5 MFLOPS (4%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 23941     avg: 25315     median: 25315 (30%)     max: 26689 ms
103%
1 MT8161 +
24610 ms (29%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 1428     avg: 1608     median: 1624 (18%)     max: 1771 ms
95%
1 MT8161 +
1713 ms (19%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1453     avg: 1531     median: 1530.5 (15%)     max: 1608 ms
1654 ms (16%)
2410 ms (23%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 PXA986 +
1448 Points (1%)
173%
1 MT8161 +
2510 Points (2%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 MT8161 +
911 Points (24%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 MT8161 +
1398 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 MT8161 +
1866 Points (25%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 3257     avg: 3515     median: 3514.5 (8%)     max: 3772 points
7512 points (17%)
2140 points (5%)
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 PXA986 +
2945 Points (19%)
44%
1 WM8950 +
1282 Points (8%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 11051     avg: 11392     median: 11392 (26%)     max: 11733 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
26820 Points (27%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 137     avg: 160     median: 159 (5%)     max: 184 Iter./s
483%
1 MT8161 +
768 Iter./s (24%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 4077     avg: 4208     median: 4266 (14%)     max: 4281 Iter./s
181%
1 MT8161 +
7742 Iter./s (25%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
100%
1 PXA986 +
min: 3273     avg: 3820     median: 3976 (1%)     max: 4210 Points
1101%
1 MT8161 +
43768 Points (6%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT8161 +
3396 Points (17%)

Average Benchmarks Marvell PXA986 → 100% n=2

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT8161 → 153% n=2

Average Benchmarks WonderMedia PRIZM WM8950 → 62% n=2

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.28
log 14. 18:45:52

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 4461 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6882 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 3778 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731606352s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Nov 2024 05:16:19 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.056s ... 0.056s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.056s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 4461 +0.001s ... 0.057s

#9 got single benchmarks 4461 +0.005s ... 0.062s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6882 +0.001s ... 0.063s

#11 got single benchmarks 6882 +0.005s ... 0.067s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 3778 +0.001s ... 0.068s

#13 got single benchmarks 3778 +0.003s ... 0.071s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.071s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.02s ... 0.091s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.091s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)