Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Intel Core i5-1155G7

Intel Core 2 Duo P8800

► remove from comparison Intel P8800

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8800 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.66 GHz, ist die Performance jedoch für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert von einem schnelleren Prozessor).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Intel Core i5-1155G7

► remove from comparison Intel i5-1155G7

Der Intel Core i5-1155G7 ist ein sparsamer Quad-Core-SoC für Notebooks und Ultrabooks, der auf der Tiger-Lake-Architektur basiert und Mitte 2021 vorgestellt wurde (als Teil des Refresh). Tiger Lake wird im verbesserten 10nm+-Verfahren bei Intel gefertigt und nutzt die neuen Willow Cove CPU-Kerne mit einer neuen Architektur. Die Basis-Taktraten sind je nach TDP Einstellung unterschiedlich. Bei 12 Watt 1 GHz und bei maximalen 28 Watt taktet er mit garantierten 2,5 GHz. Der Boost Takt ist bei allen mit maximal 4,5 GHz spezifiziert.

Eine weitere Neuerung ist die integrierte Intel Xe G7 Grafikkarte (Gen 12) mit 80 EUs und bis zu 1,35 GHz welche eine deutlich höhere Leistung wie die alte Iris Plus G7 in Ice Lake bietet.

Wie bisher wird auch weiterhin WLAN (Wifi 6) und Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 im Chip teilintegriert für schnellere, günstige und platzsparende Implementierungen in Notebooks. 

Alle Artikel über Tiger Lake, finden Sie auf unserer Tiger-Lake-Übersichtsseite.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P8800Intel Core i5-1155G7
CodenamePenrynTiger Lake-UP3
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Tiger Lake
Serie: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 « 2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 « 2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 compare2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock2660 MHz2500 - 4500 MHz
FSB1066
L1 Cache128 KB320 KB
L2 Cache3 MB5 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 8
TDP25 Watt28 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm10 nm
Voltage1.00V-1.25V V
Die Size107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGA479, PGA478BGA1449
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-4266 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, HT, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA
Architecturex86x86
$241 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
L3 Cache8 MB
iGPUIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs (400 - 1350 MHz)

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-1155G7
31.7 pt (53%)
AMD E1-2100
2.31 -93%
...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
30.9 -3%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
31 -2%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100
31.2 -2%
Intel Core i7-10750H
31.2 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U
31.2 -2%
Intel Xeon E-2276M
31.3 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
31.4 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
31.6 0%
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
31.6 0%
Intel Core i5-1155G7
31.7
Intel Core i7-10850H
31.7 0%
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
31.8 0%
Intel Core i7-10875H
32.1 1%
Intel Core i5-11320H
32.1 1%
Intel Core i7-10870H
32.1 1%
Intel Core i3-1215U
32.2 2%
Intel Core i9-9980HK
32.2 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
32.2 2%
Intel Core i7-1185G7
32.3 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 50%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 90%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 5471     avg: 5625     median: 5612 (5%)     max: 5791 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1362     avg: 1409     median: 1419 (60%)     max: 1446 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 521     avg: 541     median: 550 (61%)     max: 551 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 2123     avg: 2190     median: 2173 (5%)     max: 2273 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 858     avg: 892     median: 890 (6%)     max: 928 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 210     avg: 210.7     median: 211 (59%)     max: 211 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 P8800 +
1.5 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 2798     avg: 2890     median: 2932 (18%)     max: 2940 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 5240     avg: 5357     median: 5370 (4%)     max: 5460 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 982     avg: 994     median: 993.5 (12%)     max: 1005 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 30.8     avg: 31.4     median: 31.4 (6%)     max: 31.9 s
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 24862     avg: 25019     median: 24992 (14%)     max: 25203 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 4603     avg: 4831     median: 4941 (58%)     max: 4949 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 7.13     avg: 7.4     median: 7.5 (13%)     max: 7.55 fps
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 979     avg: 1011     median: 1011 (13%)     max: 1043 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 536     avg: 547     median: 540 (4%)     max: 566 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.605     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (13%)     max: 0.616 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 2309     avg: 2355     median: 2355 (5%)     max: 2401 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 19     avg: 19.5     median: 19.5 (4%)     max: 19.9 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 44     avg: 45.6     median: 45.6 (2%)     max: 47.2 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 961     avg: 1049     median: 1048.5 (5%)     max: 1136 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P8800 +
min: 24450     avg: 26155     median: 26155 (12%)     max: 27860 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P8800 +
18000 MFLOPS (14%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P8800 +
6.3 Points (81%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 P8800 +
4658 Points (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 11355     avg: 11710     median: 11849 (30%)     max: 11925 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 9401     avg: 9981     median: 10243 (26%)     max: 10298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14439     avg: 14655     median: 14727 (26%)     max: 14798 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 5082     avg: 5291     median: 5223 (22%)     max: 5569 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1461     avg: 1471     median: 1473 (58%)     max: 1480 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 5654     avg: 5747     median: 5761 (10%)     max: 5825 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 6195     avg: 6306     median: 6305.5 (63%)     max: 6416 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 21969     avg: 22182     median: 22182 (22%)     max: 22395 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 669     avg: 690     median: 689 (1%)     max: 712 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 189.5     avg: 190.1     median: 190.1 (53%)     max: 190.6 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 242     avg: 243.7     median: 244 (45%)     max: 245 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1381     avg: 1388     median: 1388 (53%)     max: 1395 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 42.2     avg: 45.5     median: 44.9 (8%)     max: 49.5 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 50.7     avg: 55.7     median: 58.2 (11%)     max: 58.3 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 3.17     avg: 3.3     median: 3.3 (2%)     max: 3.48 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 5.5     avg: 5.8     median: 5.8 (6%)     max: 6.07 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 14.7     avg: 16.1     median: 15.3 (11%)     max: 18.3 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-1155G7 → 0% n=0

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
red legend - Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.28
log 19. 15:05:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 477 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13226 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1734617107s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 19 Dec 2024 05:18:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 477 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 477 +0.005s ... 0.009s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 13226 +0.004s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 13226 +0.009s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.04s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.042s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
Mail Logo
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)