Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

Intel Core 2 Duo P8600

► remove from comparison Intel P8600

Der Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 Dual-Core Prozessor bietet zwei Prozessorkerne mit einem gemeinsamen Level 2 Cache von 3 MB. Im Vergleich zu den stärkeren Modellen bietet, der P8600 zwar nur die Hälfte an Level 2 Cache, jedoch bleibt dadurch der Stromverbrauch mit maximal 25 Watt auch geringer. Die Architektur des Prozessors basiert auf den Penryn Kern und wird in 45nm gefertigt.

Dank der relativ hohen Taktung von 2.4 GHz, ist die Performance jedoch für die meisten Spiele in 2009 ausreichend (nur GTA 4 profitiert deutlich von einem schnelleren Prozessor). Im Vergleich zu AMD Prozessoren, schlägt der P8600 den derzeit schnellsten Turion II Ultra M640 deutlich (dieser ist auf dem Niveau des 2.26 GHz schnellen Core 2 Duo P8400).

Der Penryn (Montevina Update) Kern bietet 2 Integer Units, 1 Floating Point Unit, 1 Load Unit und 1 Store Unit in einer 14-stufigen Pipeline. Mit der Wide Dynamic Execution Technologie kann der Kern bis zu vier volle Instruktionen gleichzeitig ausführen.

Dank Dynamic Acceleration (später Turbo Modus genannt), kann sich ein Kern um eine Stufe übertakten, wenn der zweite im Idle Modus (Leerlauf) ist.

Das integrierte Enhanced Speedstep kann die Taktfrequenz des Prozessors dynamisch an die Leistungsanforderungen anpassen. Dadurch läuft die CPU ohne Last nur mit 1200 MHz.

Der Core 2 Duo P8600 passt in den Socket P (mit 479 Pins):

Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300

► remove from comparison

Der Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 ist ein CULV Notebookprozessor für kleine und flache Notebooks. Durch die geringe Taktrate von nur 1.3 GHz ist die CPU auf lediglich 10 Watt TDP spezifiziert. Die Performance ist dadurch realtiv gering, für anspruchslose Aufgaben ausreichend und nicht so einschränkend, wie bei Atom basierenden Netbooks.

In vielen Notebooks (z.B. Asus UL Serie) kann die CPU werksmäßig deutlich übertaktet werden (auf z.B. 1.7 GHz) wodurch auch die Leistung deutlich steigt.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P8600Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Serie: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 « 2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 « 1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2400 MHz1300 MHz
FSB1066800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt10 Watt
Transistors274 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm45 nm
Voltage1-1.25 V V
Die Size81 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketSocket P (BGA479, PGA478)BGA956
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyEnhanced Speedstep, VT-x, TXT
Architecturex86x86
$209 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
392 Points (0%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
208 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
84 Points (9%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 149     avg: 154.5     median: 154.5 (0%)     max: 160 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
118 Points (1%)
min: 72     avg: 72.2     median: 72.2 (0%)     max: 72.4 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
65 Points (18%)
min: 38.39     avg: 38.7     median: 38.7 (11%)     max: 39 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.34     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.4 Points
min: 0.77     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.4 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2545     avg: 2644     median: 2618 (16%)     max: 2995 Points
min: 869     avg: 1462     median: 1496 (9%)     max: 1645 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4619     avg: 4965     median: 4910 (4%)     max: 5714 Points
min: 1642     avg: 2777     median: 2813 (2%)     max: 3181 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 3020     avg: 3045     median: 3045.5 (2%)     max: 3067 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1501     avg: 1576     median: 1586 (2%)     max: 1629 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1100 s (13%)
min: 2029     avg: 3417     median: 3615 (43%)     max: 4608 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 32.5     avg: 34.2     median: 34.6 (7%)     max: 35.4 s
min: 37.2     avg: 67.6     median: 61.3 (12%)     max: 118.5 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
885 Points (1%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2492     avg: 2515     median: 2514.5 (1%)     max: 2537 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 1445     avg: 1450     median: 1450 (17%)     max: 1455 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
4.8 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
26.5 fps (6%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.5 fps (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 SU7300 +
0 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 SU7300 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
100%
1 SU7300 +
8394 Seconds (59%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
100%
1 SU7300 +
min: 2.84     avg: 2.9     median: 2.9 (62%)     max: 2.86 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1972     avg: 2135     median: 2155 (5%)     max: 2212 Points
min: 1078     avg: 1167     median: 1178 (3%)     max: 1229 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 20.55     avg: 21     median: 20.8 (5%)     max: 21.48 s
min: 22     avg: 34.2     median: 37.2 (8%)     max: 38 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 48.8     avg: 50.3     median: 50 (2%)     max: 52.8 s
min: 54     avg: 78     median: 85 (4%)     max: 88 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1160 s (5%)
min: 1341     avg: 1830     median: 2059 (9%)     max: 2091 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
22444 MIPS (11%)
min: 10480     avg: 11679     median: 11968.5 (6%)     max: 12300 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
16370 MFLOPS (13%)
min: 8790     avg: 9118     median: 8911 (7%)     max: 9860 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3731     avg: 5437     median: 5443 (11%)     max: 6939 Points
min: 2440     avg: 2819     median: 2819 (6%)     max: 3198 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.3 Points (76%)
4.2 Points (60%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
6 Points (77%)
4.1 Points (53%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 4306     avg: 4556     median: 4594 (4%)     max: 4735 Points
min: 2303     avg: 2494     median: 2579 (2%)     max: 2600 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
11926 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 SU7300 +
983 Points (2%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
207 Points (8%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SU7300 +
392 Points (1%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1024 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1707 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 P8600 +
2302 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 P8600 +
1248 Points (24%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
2624 Points (4%)
1536 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1454 Points (22%)
855 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 P8600 +
2209 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 P8600 +
2676 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 P8600 +
4933 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 P8600 +
2810 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 P8600 +
3466 Points (9%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 P8600 +
min: 2098     avg: 3453     median: 3453 (4%)     max: 4808 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 P8600 +
min: 305.8     avg: 308.5     median: 308.5 (3%)     max: 311.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 P8600 +
275.5 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 P8600 +
13028 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 → 57% n=19

- Bereich der Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
- Durchschnittliche Benchmarkergebnisse für diese Grafikkarte
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 16. 12:57:17

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 399 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 503 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1731758236s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Nov 2024 05:16:39 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 399 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 399 +0.029s ... 0.032s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 503 +0.001s ... 0.033s

#10 got single benchmarks 503 +0.022s ... 0.055s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.062s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.007s ... 0.069s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.071s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.071s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.018s ... 0.09s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.09s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.092s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.093s

#20 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.099s

#21 return log +0.003s ... 0.102s

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel, um uns zu unterstützen. Jeder Link hilft!
> Notebook Test, Laptop Test und News > Benchmarks / Technik > Benchmarks / Technik > Prozessor Vergleich - Head 2 Head
Autor: Klaus Hinum,  8.09.2017 (Update:  1.07.2023)